Re: Clojars deployment failing

Whelp -- Just another data point -- I got two releases through just now successfully. So this is intermittent or something was fixed. On Wednesday, February 19, 2020 at 10:24:47 PM UTC-6, Aaron D. wrote: > > Hey Toby > > > What do you mean by "I disabled :checksum checking for clojars"? > > I

Re: Clojars deployment failing

Hey Toby > What do you mean by "I disabled :checksum checking for clojars"? I added `:checksum :ignore` to :repositories in profile.clj -- per lein example here > $ lein version

Re: Clojars deployment failing

Also, what version of lein are you using? What is the output of `lein version`? On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 8:14 PM Toby Crawley wrote: > > Howdy Aaron: > > We've had a report from another user on Slack of this same issue, but > I haven't been able to recreate it. > > What do you mean by "I disabled

Re: Clojars deployment failing

Howdy Aaron: We've had a report from another user on Slack of this same issue, but I haven't been able to recreate it. What do you mean by "I disabled :checksum checking for clojars"? What version of java are you using? What is the output of java -version? Thanks! - Toby -- "Arrogance is

[ANN] superlifter - DataLoader for Clojure

Hi everyone, I am pleased to announce the first release of superlifter . Superlifter is an implementation of DataLoader for Clojure. To quote from the DataLoader readme: DataLoader allows you to decouple unrelated

ANN: jedi-time 0.2.1

Hi folks, Third time is a charm they say ... :) After spending a bit more time with REBL and my specs, I realised that navigation with the former can be made more intuitive, and the latter should be simpler. Therefore, I (slightly) changed the data-model again, and I think have finally found

DKIM signing

Hi, Does anyone know of a email DKIM signing implementation in Clojure? Best wishes, Brjánn Ljótsson Karolinska Institutet Sweden -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note

Re: Clojure 1.10 "Illegal Reflective Access Operation"

I believe this has already been discussed in this same thread, but to rehash. More info on what this warning means: https://clojure.org/guides/faq#illegal_access To diagnose the cause, you can use --illegal-access=debug to get better info about the cause. Here I assume it's in xml/parse, but

Re: A controversial call to bump libraries from 0.x to 1.0

I think you are misinterpreting what people believe the 0.x to 1.x means. In the wide world of semver, 0.x indicates "unstable" and 1.x indicates "first stable"- you're conflating that special case with a general n.x to n+1.x which is interpreted as "breaking change". (See https://semver.org/

Re: Clojure 1.10 "Illegal Reflective Access Operation"

Todays warning: (defn fix-fields "Only Fields branch" [] (:content (-> (clojure.zip/xml-zip (xml/parse "specs/RHUB_v2.8_QuickFIX.xml")) zip/down zip/right zip/right zip/right zip/right