On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 13:14 +0100, Konrad Hinsen wrote:
On 4 Dec 2009, at 23:23, Cliff Wells wrote:
What isn't clear to me is exactly what a piece of paper provides
that an
electronic form doesn't (aside from inconvenience). I don't see any
A clear legal status all over the world
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 11:49 -0800, Richard Newman wrote:
The problem is that it is an unreasonably high barrier to entry.
There MUST be an electronic-only way (and it must not require a cell
phone, CC#, c.) if the full potential of this community is to be
unleashed upon
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 22:54 -0700, Meikel Brandmeyer wrote:
Hi,
On Sep 30, 12:19 am, Cliff Wells cliff.we...@gmail.com wrote:
In short, you've taken something that was originally CPU-bound and made it
I/O-bound.
I don't think so. The measured times do not include the println
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 09:08 -0700, Matt wrote:
So, using mytime2 with the myavgtime macro gives average execution
times for the expression (+ 1 2 3) of 2 to 3 times longer than when
using mytime1. Why is this? Does the JIT optimize differently with all
those println's when using mytime2?
Hi,
I'm new to Clojure (and Lisp-type languages in general) and I've never
used Java... in short, I have a steep learning curve littered with rocks
and nails. I also don't know whether it's a good thing that I have
long experience with Python and C :-P
In any case, as a first project, I'm
