I love clojure but I think it's unnecessary it doesn't ship with a simple
clj and a clj.bat script out of the box, yeah it's easy to run it with jvm,
but who want to type
java -server -Djava.ext.dirs=./lib:/opt/bin/lib -cp
~/.emacs.d/lisp-packages/swank-clojure jline.ConsoleRunner
You can work with java objects. But clojure itself is not object oriented,
because it's functional, and object orientation requires state manipulation.
Other lisps support object orientation, common-lisp for example.
cheers,
/J
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 1:46 PM, HB hubaghd...@gmail.com wrote:
Not every web application has to scale. I think that continuation based
stuff rocks for adminstration interfaces.
The main benefit with continuation based stuff, is that it's possible to
build something that is more application like, so that one can avoid
building wizards, and having to split up
I have written a production web app with compojure. It was a very nice
experience. First project I have pulled of totally TDD and the
functional aspect of clojure really makes tests so much easier and
more truthful, although there sometimes seems to sneak in some
exceptions I didn't expect from
