this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Clojure group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
-Mohit Thatte
--
You received
/optout.
--
-Mohit Thatte
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from
an
email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
-Mohit Thatte
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts
I see what you mean, this is nice [?]
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:25 PM, Herwig Hochleitner hhochleit...@gmail.com
wrote:
2015-05-28 19:42 GMT+02:00 Mohit Thatte mohit.tha...@gmail.com:
The interesting question here is what constitutes useful information!
(let [pred #(exists? .foo
because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Clojure group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
-Mohit Thatte
--
You received
as the error message and that could be achieved
without breaking the API.
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Herwig Hochleitner hhochleit...@gmail.com
wrote:
2015-05-28 19:22 GMT+02:00 Mohit Thatte mohit.tha...@gmail.com:
Changing wait-until to a macro seems like the simplest way to tackle
because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Clojure group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
-Mohit Thatte
--
You received this message
