I barely have time to do anything in Clojure these days, but the work
you've done, the talks you've given, and so on are worth the price of
admission. I really do hope enough chip in so you can focus on your
work with the language until such time as you can make it profitable
in other ways, if
If you look at the data_structures page on clojure.org you'll see
there are sorted maps available to allow guarantees of being sorted by
Key.
~Patrick
On Aug 27, 1:40 pm, Jeremy Gailor jer...@infinitecube.com wrote:
Traditionally, there is no guarantee for the sorting order of keys in a map.
it seemed to stop taking new
keys.
Am I doing something silly here or is this a bug?
~Patrick Sullivan
On Aug 6, 5:53 am, Rich Hickey richhic...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 5, 10:10 pm, Luc Prefontaine lprefonta...@softaddicts.ca
wrote:
I like this very much... that's the kind of clever
Err assoc! obviously ;-)
(Sorry for the double post, didn't want to confuse Cristophe).
On Aug 7, 8:15 am, Patrick Sullivan wizardofwestma...@gmail.com
wrote:
I don't have the EXACT code handy to c/p (at work now) but I did
something like the following.
(apologies for doing
Newman john...@gmail.com wrote:
(def transhashmap (transient {})
(assoc transhashmap a 1)
(assoc transhashmap b 2)
etc
Isn't that what Rich was talking about, about not bashing in place?
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Patrick Sullivan
wizardofwestma...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't
