Hi all, I'm super tired, so apologies if this has already been covered, but
I think portability is the main issue. Java is very portable, whereas the
CLR is focused on a single platform.
Also, most of the innovations in the Clojure space have been built on top
of the JVM. Until Clojure reaches cri
Hi Saul,
thanks for writing this. Embarrassingly I wasn't even aware of the
UnboundID LDAP SDK, so it's great to find two useful things I can use
right away!
I would like to implement a LDAP authentication in Clojure, based
around clj-ldap. Do you think it is necessary for the bind-request
functi
he other hand, your method
requires less trips, but I'm not sure how much impact it would have if
it were independent of web traffic and over a fast local connection.
Paul
On Mar 15, 9:46 pm, Saul Hazledine wrote:
> On Mar 15, 1:30 am, Paul Dorman wrote:
>
> > Hi Saul,
>
of time in the REPL trying to get this right. 1:50 on Monday
morning now though, so I think I'll have to reluctantly step away from
the computer.
Regards,
Paul
On Mar 20, 11:34 pm, Saul Hazledine wrote:
> On Mar 16, 9:30 am, Ray Miller wrote:
>
> > On 15 March 2011 08:46, Sau
Hi Shree,
while I wouldn't dare give you technical advice, I may have something
to offer as a fellow Clojure noob. I did try Sandbar for my project,
but found, as I delved deeper into the universe of Clojure web
development, that I was altogether over-complicating everything. This,
and the fact th
Thanks from me as well. This very question was my very next challenge.
I would like to reuse Clojure functions from ClojureScript to achieve
consistent back- and front-end password quality validation.
One potential wrinkle may be the issue of the size of the bloom filter I'm
using for the diction
The following will work for GMail users. I expect that many mail clients
have similar functionality.
In Mail Settings > Labels create a new Label for ClojureScript. I nested it
below Clojure in my settings.
In Mail Settings > Filters create a new filter for ClojureScript. Set the
criteria to To: c
While I hope this thread dies a quick death, I'd like to offer the words
'properly' and 'well' as sometimes effective substitutes for
'idiomatically'. I am always interested in understanding how programming
challenges can be addressed idiomatically, properly, and well, though I'm
unlikely to have a
