Re: Rationale for `keys` not supporting vectors?

I asked a question about this on Stack Overflow; you may be interested in the discussion there: http://stackoverflow.com/q/35341969/5044950 On Saturday, July 9, 2016 at 12:50:22 AM UTC-4, Michael Gardner wrote: > > I've looked around, but couldn't find any discussion on the topic. Is it >

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.9.0-alpha9

Awesome, thank you Alex! By the way, are there any plans to add more elegant support for "hybrid maps" (as discussed here and here ) in the future? On Tuesday, July 5, 2016 at 3:50:47 PM

Re: clojure.spec and generic map with couple of special keys

I ran into this same issue while trying to spec Clojure's destructuring language. I asked a question about this on Stack Overflow: http://stackoverflow.com/q/38151446/5044950 On Tuesday, July 5, 2016 at 9:16:40 AM UTC-4, Nikita Prokopov wrote: > > Imagine I have a generic keyword => string map

Re: [ANN] clojure-future-spec, a backport of clojure.spec for 1.8

mespace dependencies. > > > > Sean Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN > An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org > > > > *From: *Sam Estep > *Sent: *Thursday, June 30, 2016 9:36 PM > *To: *Clojure > *Subject: *Re: [ANN] clojure-future-spec, a backport of clojure.

Re: [ANN] clojure-future-spec, a backport of clojure.spec for 1.8

I spent quite a while trying to figure out how I can use some features of spec, like destructuring, to work properly when my specs are in a separate namespace. I asked a question about this on Stack Overflow; do you have any advice on how to solve