Re: blip clojure videos from roku

2012-04-07 Thread Terrance Davis
at 7:16 PM, Terrance Davis terrance.da...@gmail.com wrote: I love the videos up at blip.tv/clojure. Is there anyway to watch these episodes from my roku? I already explored every option I could think of, unsuccessfully. I'm hoping someone on the list already figured this one out

blip clojure videos from roku

2012-04-05 Thread Terrance Davis
I love the videos up at blip.tv/clojure. Is there anyway to watch these episodes from my roku? I already explored every option I could think of, unsuccessfully. I'm hoping someone on the list already figured this one out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: Clojure 1.3 Alpha 4

2010-12-16 Thread Terrance Davis
*begin rant* I have yet to see anyone who posts the classic rtfm (even politely) response search previous posts and realize that rtfm responses have already been sent and refrain from sending the same explanation of how to use a mailing list over and over and over. Simple customer service

Re: [OT] Photos from Clojure Conj 2010

2010-10-29 Thread Terrance Davis
Nice pics. I am incredibly jealous of everyone that had the chance to attend. -Terrance Baishampayan Ghose wrote: Hello, I had the pleasure of attending the first Clojure Conj and I have uploaded some photographs that I took there -

parrot vm

2010-10-28 Thread Terrance Davis
Is anyone working on clojure for the parrot vm? -Terrance -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first

Re: precise numbers

2010-10-13 Thread Terrance Davis
The quick and dirty proof (not formal proof) for 1 = .... 1/3 = .33... 2/3 = .66... 3/3 = .99... Think of 3/3 as 1/3 (that is .3...) times 3. -Terrance Davis www.terrancedavis.com Felix H. Dahlke wrote: On 13/10/10 22:28, David Sletten wrote: On Oct 12, 2010, at 5

Re: Is knowing Java a prerequisite for using Clojure?

2009-09-17 Thread Terrance Davis
I'll add my two cents. You sound like you already program, so basic Java knowledge is useful with Clojure, but not necessary. You can pick up what you need to know as you learn Clojure. You will find hooks into Java are a lot more pleasant than interfacing with C and C++. I'm saying that one

temp variables best practice

2009-09-12 Thread Terrance Davis
Commonly, I break down complex lines of code into several easy to follow simple lines of code. This results in many temp variables that are not intended to be used anywhere else in the code. Sometimes I see a method reusing common primitives and objects (like ints and Strings), so to prevent

Re: temp variables best practice

2009-09-12 Thread Terrance Davis
the Clojure version in a Clojure-esque manner? On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Sean Devlin francoisdev...@gmail.com wrote: Could you post an example?  It'd be easier to comment on it. On Sep 12, 6:32 pm, Terrance Davis terrance.da...@gmail.com wrote: Commonly, I break down complex lines

clojure classpaths

2009-09-01 Thread Terrance Davis
Clojure is great. I have begun integrating Clojure v1.0 into my current project. I seem to be missing something real easy, ... It seems like every path I set from java -cp is ignored from inside of REPL, main or calling AOT classes. In fact, when I start Clojure from a directory, I  have to

Re: clojure classpaths

2009-09-01 Thread Terrance Davis
be missing something real simple. I just can't figure out what it is. Thanks again! On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 6:46 AM, Meikel Brandmeyerm...@kotka.de wrote: Hi, On Sep 1, 6:58 am, Terrance Davis terrance.da...@gmail.com wrote: It seems like every path I set from java -cp is ignored from inside

Re: clojure classpaths

2009-09-01 Thread Terrance Davis
download. I am starting to wonder if I need to build from source to get this classpath problem to go away. On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Krukowkarl.kru...@gmail.com wrote: On Sep 1, 5:03 pm, Terrance Davis terrance.da...@gmail.com wrote: Okay. Here's some additional information. I have