I was looking at
http://saucelabs.com/blog/index.php/2009/12/running-your-selenium-tests-in-parallel-clojure/
and in the comments, :Scott suggested that a macro could reduce some
of the boilerplate that you see here:
(def test-google
{
:name "google"
:test (fn [client]
(doto cl
Hi
Here's another macro-noob question. (Thanks for the help on the
previous question and please do let me know if stackoverflow is a more
appropriate place to ask noob questions.)
I'm trying to write a macro (or a function) that defines/declares
specifically named functions. In (let [eff "gee"] (
> The problem here is that macros run at compile time, but let bindings
> exist at run time.
>
> If you need the name to be determined at run time you will need to use eval.
Where do I use eval? I tried looking at the argument to see if it was
called with a string literal vs a symbol, but can't ev
Mark, it turns out that everything I need is known and static at hack-
time. (Sorry for making it sound otherwise) I know all the names,
values, *and* behaviors that I want to use when I'm writing the code
for my tests. I just want my clojurebox symbol completion to work
after having written a bunc
I'm on a Windows machine. Does the output below indicate that I need
something like cygwin? Thanks in advance!
[default] VM booted and ready for use!
[default] Mounting shared folders...
[default] -- v-root: /vagrant
[default] Running provisioner: Vagrant::Provisioners::Shell...
[default] stdin: i
gt;
> As a starting point. Vagrant related channels should be able to help
> you further (but please communicate your solution back to the group!).
>
> Thanks,
> -justin
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 2:20 PM, nil wrote:
> > I'm o
I was using the latest VirtualBox (4.0.10) and it was complaining
about a version mismatch between Guest Additions Version: 4.0.6 and
VirtualBox Version: 4.0.10. So I switched to VirtualBox Version 4.0.6
instead and the output is below. It no longer complains about the
mismatch. I'm continuing to
The two functions below should return true if the first argument is
divisible by any of the prime numbers (ascending) in the second
argument, and false otherwise. But the second function is much slower.
I haven't been able to figure out why. Can you?
Also, if there is a more idiomatic way, please
Oh right. What you said is what I meant. I renamed the functions
improperly and then fooled myself. But I still can't figure out why
the second one is much slower.
On Jul 21, 4:09 pm, Tassilo Horn wrote:
> nil writes:
>
> Hi!
>
> > The two functions below should r
id, a properly written loop will always be faster that an
> idiomatic version using first-order functions.
>
> On Jul 22, 12:17 am, nil wrote:
>
>
>
> > Oh right. What you said is what I meant. I renamed the functions
> > improperly and then fooled myself. But I still c
-f
package-updates
And the result is there's no match for M-x slime-connect
On Jul 8, 11:47 am, nil wrote:
> I was using the latest VirtualBox (4.0.10) and it was complaining
> about a version mismatch between Guest Additions Version: 4.0.6 and
> VirtualBox Version: 4.0.10. So
Until you find someone, one site you can look at is the clojure euler
site. It has some math examples written by folks who know clojure to
varying degrees. You can see different ways of tackling a given
problem.
On Jul 28, 1:26 pm, Jay Vyas wrote:
> Hi guys (and hello to my beloved london-clojuri
Yes
On Jul 29, 3:24 pm, Jeremy Heiler wrote:
>
> Is this the site you are talking about?
>
> http://clojure-euler.wikispaces.com/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that
13 matches
Mail list logo
