Phil Hagelberg writes:
> I've rolled this back briefly due to a bug surrounding deploying
> SNAPSHOT versions over scp.
The bug is fixed, and the fix is deployed.
-Phil
pgpRuN5qASLVY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Zack Maril writes:
> Is the policy for SNAPSHOT artifacts still that you can overwrite as much
> and as often as you want?
Technically no, but effectively yes. Any version ending in "-SNAPSHOT"
is automatically translated into a timestamped version upon deploy or
resolution. So "0.5.0-SNAPSHOT"
Is the policy for SNAPSHOT artifacts still that you can overwrite as much
and as often as you want?
-Zack
On Tuesday, May 14, 2013 3:30:19 AM UTC+4, Phil Hagelberg wrote:
>
>
> Phil Hagelberg writes:
>
> > In the aftermath of the recent Linode intrusion[1][2], we determined
> > that Clojars' po
Phil Hagelberg writes:
> In the aftermath of the recent Linode intrusion[1][2], we determined
> that Clojars' policy of allowing artifacts to be overwritten[3] makes it
> much more difficult to detect an attack than it would be if artifacts
> were immutable like they are in most other repositorie
Hello everyone.
In the aftermath of the recent Linode intrusion[1][2], we determined
that Clojars' policy of allowing artifacts to be overwritten[3] makes it
much more difficult to detect an attack than it would be if artifacts
were immutable like they are in most other repositories.
While overw
