The CL article is really interesting, thanks. What do you think of the idea
of using Slingshot's try+ within Dire?
On Saturday, December 29, 2012 3:55:13 PM UTC-5, Ben wrote:
>
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Michael Drogalis
> >
> wrote:
> > I've never seen that before, Ben. Can you link
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Michael Drogalis wrote:
> I've never seen that before, Ben. Can you link me?
Overview of CL conditions/restarts here:
http://www.gigamonkeys.com/book/beyond-exception-handling-conditions-and-restarts.html
The Clojure lib was clojure.contrib.error-kit
(http://ric
I've never seen that before, Ben. Can you link me?
Just pushed version 0.1.1 with these suggestions:
- Tasks are now simple functions, not macros
- Using metadata to keep track of handlers rather than an atom.
- Fixed namespace collision issue
- Pass original arguments of task function to error h
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Michael Drogalis wrote:
> On Saturday, December 29, 2012 9:57:56 AM UTC-5, Adam Clements wrote:
>> One thing that worries me though. While this is fine for examples where
>> you simply log the exception and move on, what if you need to do something
>> more complic
Thanks for the awesome feedback.
On Saturday, December 29, 2012 9:57:56 AM UTC-5, Adam Clements wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> I really like the idea of pulling out exception handling from the function
> bodies. The try catch form has always bugged me a little bit.
>
> One thing that worries me though. Whil
Hey,
I really like the idea of pulling out exception handling from the function
bodies. The try catch form has always bugged me a little bit.
One thing that worries me though. While this is fine for examples where you
simply log the exception and move on, what if you need to do something more
Indeed, that is the paper - Joe Armstrong's 2003 dissertation "Making
Reliable Distributed Systems in the Presence of Software Errors".
The video for Rich's The Language of the System:
http://skillsmatter.com/podcast/scala/the-language-of-the-system
On Friday, December 28, 2012 8:40:28 PM UTC-5,
I see joe's thesis is linked on your github page. is this thesis the paper
you are referring to?
Do you have a link to the video you refer to?
thanks
Dave
On Saturday, 29 December 2012 06:14:34 UTC+11, Michael Drogalis wrote:
>
> Hey folks,
>
> After watching The Language of the System and bei
I kind of forgot about user defined exceptions containing useful things.
Good point. Deployed this adjustment to dire-0.1.0 with commit
https://github.com/MichaelDrogalis/dire/commit/4a493e85ca88dd59806651264103de53a2879b66
On Friday, December 28, 2012 3:32:41 PM UTC-5, Craig Brozefsky wrote:
>
Michael Drogalis writes:
>Perhaps. Is there anything in the exception object that is useful? I
>passed on it because the implementer of a handler already knows what
>exception occurred. I'm happy to pass it as an argument if we have good
>reasons for it.
If my handler is going to
Perhaps. Is there anything in the exception object that is useful? I passed
on it because the implementer of a handler already knows what
exception occurred. I'm happy to pass it as an argument if we have good
reasons for it.
On Friday, December 28, 2012 2:54:45 PM UTC-5, marc wrote:
>
> Would
Would it make sense for the handler to have access to the exception 'e' ?
On 29/12/2012, at 6:14 AM, Michael Drogalis wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> After watching The Language of the System and being directed to Joe
> Armstrong's paper on error handling, I concurred that his approach is
> fantastic
Hey folks,
After watching The Language of the System and being directed to Joe
Armstrong's paper on error handling, I concurred that his approach is
fantastic. I really wanted the same thing for more rudimentary operations,
like file handling. So I wrote Dire https://github.com/MichaelDrogalis/
13 matches
Mail list logo
