At a sort of leisurely pace, but yes, we are. We have quite a few members
of this list on our dev team these days :)
Please reply off list.
--Alex
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Lucas Daniel
wrote:
> Hey Alex are you still looking for devs?
> Cheers!
>
> --
> You received this message because
Hey Alex are you still looking for devs?
Cheers!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
T
A couple of updates on things that were discussed earlier.
1. Thanks to this thread we are now talking to quite a few awesome people
from North America. So, not everyone able and willing to write Clojure on
the day job has this wish fulfilled, after all :)
2. We are not doing H1Bs/relocations
Again, does it offers H1B's?
I've got a good github(mostly ruby), but like you said... I'm from south
america. I don't mind to freelance for a while with you guys until next
H1B's quota, or to pay it with my work.
I think the thread kinda has lost it's purpose as people started arguing
about Ruby
On Tuesday, November 19, 2013 7:44:33 PM UTC-5, Alexey Verkhovsky wrote:
>
> Back to the original subject of the thread, it looks like either there is
> more Clojure work than people with platform expertise, or Clojure is a
> mostly South American phenomenon. One way or the other, South America
On Wednesday, 20 November 2013 01:16:35 UTC-7, Alex Baranosky wrote:
>
> Why all that pesky Ruby? =D
>
1. Because it was a new/shiny object 8 years ago
2. It actually worked better than Bash, Tcl, Perl, Java or even Python for
me in a testing team toolsmith role in mid 2000s
3. In 2006-7 ThoughtW
Why all that pesky Ruby? =D
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Alexey Verkhovsky <
alexey.verkhov...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Monday, 18 November 2013 16:45:40 UTC-7, Tony Tam wrote:
>>
>> If I sent you a like to a github profile that looked like yours (
>> https://github.com/alexeyv?tab=repositorie
On Monday, 18 November 2013 16:45:40 UTC-7, Tony Tam wrote:
>
> If I sent you a like to a github profile that looked like yours (
> https://github.com/alexeyv?tab=repositories), would I ever get an answer?
> I mean, it's very probable that all your activity is going into private
> repos.
>
I'd p
H1B sponsor?
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 1:47 AM, gaz jones wrote:
> *your :)
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 9:46 PM, gaz jones wrote:
>
>> If you're account had a picture like his, YES.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Tony Tam wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm always curious about remarks li
*your :)
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 9:46 PM, gaz jones wrote:
> If you're account had a picture like his, YES.
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Tony Tam wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm always curious about remarks like this:
>>
>>
>> A link to your Github profile counts for much more than a stell
If you're account had a picture like his, YES.
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Tony Tam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm always curious about remarks like this:
>
>
> A link to your Github profile counts for much more than a stellar resume.
>> Doesn't have to be in Clojure.
>>
>
> If I sent you a like to
Hi,
I'm always curious about remarks like this:
A link to your Github profile counts for much more than a stellar resume.
> Doesn't have to be in Clojure.
>
If I sent you a like to a github profile that looked like yours (
https://github.com/alexeyv?tab=repositories), would I ever get an answer
Hello, all,
I'm a Clojure noob (half way through Stu Halloway's book), who's just
joined this group today. Sorry about my first post being a recruitment
spam. Seeing that there aren't that many yet, I hope nobody minds. For the
right kind of people (talented, pragmatic and not averse to full-
13 matches
Mail list logo
