Re: Dauphin: mona lisa genetic algorithm in clojure

2009-01-27 Thread Christian Vest Hansen
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 8:43 AM, bOR_ wrote: > > According to one of the posts beneath the log, the issue has been > fixed in the latests svns. I have no clue what the technical problem > was in clojure's source. To my understanding, the technical problem was that Clojure used the same ClassLoad

Re: Dauphin: mona lisa genetic algorithm in clojure

2009-01-26 Thread bOR_
According to one of the posts beneath the log, the issue has been fixed in the latests svns. I have no clue what the technical problem was in clojure's source. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure

Re: Dauphin: mona lisa genetic algorithm in clojure

2009-01-26 Thread Christopher
This is a great post. However, the author brings up an issue with the way that lambdas are handled by the JVM. According to the article, lambdas are not garbage collected and can therefore overrun the PermGen, a special place in the heap for storing anonymous classes, and as a result, the user mus

Dauphin: mona lisa genetic algorithm in clojure

2009-01-26 Thread bOR_
Hope this isn't a double-post, but here is a nice example of a rewrite of some reddit post on a genetic algorithm for generating the mona lisa in clojure by Yann N. Dauphin http://npcontemplation.blogspot.com/2009/01/clojure-genetic-mona-lisa-problem-in.html --~--~-~--~~~-