On Dec 11, 2010, at 12:16 AM, ka wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> Can you explain this in more detail :
>
>>> I didn't have the laziness problem. I don't know if that was by accident or
>>> because Midje applies an #'eagerly function before checking.
>
> Because it seems that if code has a laziness prob
You're right Ken. I had written a macro to wrap the clojure.test stuff, and
wasn't able to put both the actual and expected inside the stubbing. If I
had just been using Amit Rathore's stuff with standard clojure.test then I'd
have had no problem!
--
You received this message because you are su
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 1:16 AM, ka wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> Can you explain this in more detail :
>
>>> I didn't have the laziness problem. I don't know if that was by accident or
>>> because Midje applies an #'eagerly function before checking.
>
> Because it seems that if code has a laziness prob
Hi Brian,
Can you explain this in more detail :
>> I didn't have the laziness problem. I don't know if that was by accident or
>> because Midje applies an #'eagerly function before checking.
Because it seems that if code has a laziness problem, Midje will
actually hide it in tests?
Thanks.
--
Hey Brian,
I just got your latest version of Midje via lein, and I'm able to use it. I
had been getting a stack trace previously. Midje is nice, because I can do
more specialized stubbing with it than with the code I got from Amit
Rathore's blog/book.
Also, this is the fmap I wrote (with the li
Shameless Self-promotion Dept: Here's how I'd write your three tests in Midje.
https://github.com/marick/Midje
(fact "chains of locations are handled"
(distances "Boston,MA" "Albany,NY" "LosAngeles,CA") => [2.0, 2.0]
(provided (dist-in-miles anything anything) => 2.0))
(fact "can convert dist
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Alex Baranosky
wrote:
> Thanks Ken.
You're welcome.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - pleas
Thanks Ken.
(doall) to the rescue! It worked!
Makes perfect sense. It explains why sometimes it would seem to work if I
put the result of the mapping into a let binding... it was calculating the
value.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" gro
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 10:50 PM, Alex Baranosky
wrote:
> (map (fn [dest] (dist-in-miles origin dest)) locations))
> It seems the stubbing is not happening when (distances "Boston,MA"
> "Albany,NY" "LosAngeles,CA") is being evaluated. But if I put print
> statements in the function to see the
I've been playing with Amit Rathore's simple mocking functions:
http://s-expressions.com/2010/01/24/conjure-simple-mocking-and-stubbing-for-clojure-unit-tests/
I'm seeing the weirdest effect, and after banging my head on it for a couple
hours I figure it's time to ask about it. Any ideas would be
10 matches
Mail list logo
