e data visualization and literate programming with Hanami:
>
> https://twitter.com/scicloj/status/1164887113680281600
>
> On Sat, 10 Aug 2019 at 21:39, Daniel Slutsky
> wrote:
>
>> Here is the video of yesterday's meeting, with Christopher Small's talk
>> about Oz:
>>
Preparing to the meeting next week, with Jon Anthony 's talk about
interactive data visualization and literate programming with Hanami:
https://twitter.com/scicloj/status/1164887113680281600
On Sat, 10 Aug 2019 at 21:39, Daniel Slutsky
wrote:
> Here is the video of yesterday's meet
status/1157646172770721798
>
> On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 at 23:28, Daniel Slutsky
> wrote:
>
>> Hi.
>>
>> In August, the Scicloj <https://twitter.com/scicloj> community will
>> begin a series of web meetings about data visualization and literate
>> program
eetings about data visualization and literate programming
> in Clojure.
>
>
> On the first meeting, Friday, Aug 9th, 5pm-7pm UTC, @Christopher_Smallwill
> talk
> about Oz <https://github.com/metasoarous/oz>.
>
>
> If you are interested in this series, it
Hi.
In August, the Scicloj <https://twitter.com/scicloj> community will begin a
series of web meetings about data visualization and literate programming in
Clojure.
On the first meeting, Friday, Aug 9th, 5pm-7pm UTC, @Christopher_Smallwill talk
about Oz <https://github.com/metas
After @bbatsov's explaination. I think he is right. I'm considering to
improve my solution. Might will be available soon.
[stardiviner] GPG key ID: 47C32433
IRC(freeenode): stardiviner Twitter: @numbchild
Key fingerprint = 9BAA 92BC CDDD B9EF 3B36 CB99 B8C4
If you got any problem after use and test, GitHub issues and PR welcome.
Thanks.
[stardiviner] GPG key ID: 47C32433
IRC(freeenode): stardiviner Twitter: @numbchild
Key fingerprint = 9BAA 92BC CDDD B9EF 3B36 CB99 B8C4 B8E5 47C3 2433
Blog:
No, I asked Clojure ML, and posted an issue on clojure-mode GitHub issues.
I need to find a workaround on myself.
You can check out the discussion here
https://github.com/clojure-emacs/clojure-mode/pull/465.
[stardiviner] GPG key ID: 47C32433
IRC(freeenode): stardiviner
I created a package ob-clojure-literate for Clojure Literate Programming in
Org-mode. Welcome to use it and add PR.
https://github.com/stardiviner/ob-clojure-literate
I still have two features not implemented. Hope someone will PR. Thanks
very much.
[stardiviner] GPG key ID
Gregg and Gary,
I understand where you are coming from. Indeed, Maturana [0] is on your
side of the debate. Since even the philosophers can't agree, I doubt we
will find a common ground.
Unfortunately, I've decided to take on the task of documenting the
Clojure internals because, yaknow, *I*
Howdy Tim,
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 1:16 AM, u1204 d...@axiom-developer.org wrote:
Gregg and Gary,
I understand where you are coming from. Indeed, Maturana [0] is on your
side of the debate. Since even the philosophers can't agree, I doubt we
will find a common ground.
Ah, but
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 11:16 PM, u1204 d...@axiom-developer.org wrote:
Heck, it is only 4 lines of C++. Why bother? *I* can read C++. I can
even reverse engineer it (probably by inventing the diagram in Figure
2.7 on a napkin). Maybe it lives in the src/SamRecon/StratSam, which is
all the
Forward from Ralf Hemmecke:
On 05/22/2014 11:21 AM, Gregg Reynolds wrote:
I can tell you I would rather maintain the four lines of C++ without
the largely useless commentary.
That's a simple AXIOM program, but I'm sure one can easily translate it
into any programming language.
foo(a:
Tim, as someone already mentioned, the multi-page Java code you posted from
the Clojure core is actually one file from the Java ASM library, copied
into the Clojure Github repository from one version of that library
available from here:
Hmmm, I didn't see that in the documentation :-)
Thanks for
PS I have many chunks of code that I wrote 20-30 years ago and I have no
idea why and what the code was written for even after reading each
line of the code
This is what got me interested in literate programming.
Axiom was written at IBM as research code, mostly by people trying to
get
Tim,
Your project of LP'ing the Clojure internals is not at all inconsistent
with my view. That is code that would benefit from being widely
understood, even by people who won't maintain it. I learned a lot from
reading the Lions book on an early version of Unix, even though I
probably
) are churning out some
pretty neat looking tools to make LP easier to do in the Clojure world. I
for one would love to see more lively discussion around that and not feel
like we're just bear-baiting whenever we mention the forbidden paradigm of
Literate Programming.
My 2c,
~ (the actual
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Tim Daly d...@axiom-developer.org wrote:
Tim, as someone already mentioned, the multi-page Java code you posted
from
the Clojure core is actually one file from the Java ASM library, copied
into the Clojure Github repository from one version of that library
I know Clojure doesn't have all the documentation many would like, but Tim,
this bit of info is in readme.txt, and the first 3 lines of every source
file from the library :-)
Touche! +2 points to you!
I love it when my oh-so-noisy self gets skewered by facts! :-)
Tim Daly
--
You received this
On Thursday, May 22, 2014 4:05:58 PM UTC-5, Gary Johnson wrote:
Hi folks,
I suspect I'm the Gary that Tim thought he was referring to since I've
posted on several of his other LP-related threads (though not this one
until now).
I cede the name Gary to Gary.
But really, at the
On Thursday, May 22, 2014 6:20:39 PM UTC-4, Mars0i wrote:
On Thursday, May 22, 2014 4:05:58 PM UTC-5, Gary Johnson wrote:
Hi folks,
I suspect I'm the Gary that Tim thought he was referring to since I've
posted on several of his other LP-related threads (though not this one
until now).
the author to the audience is the underlying
theme of literate programming. Knuth's point is about communication,
not about the machinery of communication. The question is, to what
audience, not how.
Discussions seem to get lost in a debate about the machinery rather
than the goal. We focus our
is the underlying
theme of literate programming. Knuth's point is about communication,
not about the machinery of communication. The question is, to what
audience, not how.
I'm not sure what machinery of communication means. It's not something I
ever think about when I'm programming; in fact I never
with the machine. Scratch any programmer, interview at
any company, listen to any talk, and you find machinery.
But communication from the author to the audience is the underlying
theme of literate programming. Knuth's point is about communication,
not about the machinery of communication. The question
the former but can help the latter. The same thing
goes for literate programming, but--it depends on your goals and your human
audience.
4. Two examples to convey the context-dependence of appropriate
configuration schemes:
A. One time I wrote a small but slightly complex bit of code (in Perl
the code is
doing. Comments hurt the former but can help the latter. The same thing
goes for literate programming, but--it depends on your goals and your human
audience.
4. Two examples to convey the context-dependence of appropriate
configuration schemes:
A. One time I wrote a small
Emacs org-mode provides a markdown-like language, which can be organized
into a foldable outline (e.g., chapters, sections, subsections,
subsubsections). Syntax is provided for headers, ordered/unordered lists,
tables, inline images/figures, hyperlinks, footnotes, and (most importantly
for LP)
anywhere.
(b) Literate programming.
Of course long chunks of text are needed to explain algorithms, motivation,
paths not taken, etc. Literate programming requires that those chunks be
inserted into the source file, and that you have to run the source file
through a filter to get rid of them
text anywhere.
(b) Literate programming.
Actually, lisp has a long tradition of semicolon-style comments where
Chapter
;;; Section
;; Subsection
;Paragraph or inline
With some Emacs hacking it would be possible to fold/unfold these
comments. I worked on a Transputer editor that had
Guys, you really are into the Literate part, those emails are huge! let me
catch up and then I'll reply...
Interesting discussion!
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Mark Engelberg mark.engelb...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Mark Engelberg
mark.engelb...@gmail.comwrote:
In the past I've used a java tool to write acceptance tests. Concordion [
http://concordion.org/]. The idea is simple yet effective. You write your
documentation in HTML, and later you can run your code that will interact
with that documentation and generate a new documentation, marking the
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Erlis Vidal er...@erlisvidal.com wrote:
In the past I've used a java tool to write acceptance tests. Concordion [
http://concordion.org/]. The idea is simple yet effective. You write your
documentation in HTML, and later you can run your code that will interact
I've always seen this to document what the system does, as a way to gather
requirements. And the name used is similar to what you propose. Live
Specification or Specification by Example among other names.
It never occurred to me that this could be used for API documentation, and
I'm a completely
outputs. A literate programming style not only helps me to
organize my thoughts better (both hierarchically and sequentially), but it
provides me with a living (tangled) document that I can share with my
non-programmer colleagues to get their domain-specific feedback about my
choice of model
With respect to documentation of open source software...
You keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it
means. -- The Princess Bride
The notion that reading the code is the ultimate truth for
documentation is based on a misunderstanding at so many levels it is
hard to
that his choice of literate
programming as the name of his new method was tongue in cheek, since it
makes anybody who doesn't use it an illiterate programmer. (The citation
is in one of the essays in his book Literate Programming.) So maybe we
should stop using it and come up with a more accurate name
started (
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!topic/clojure/oh_bWL9_jI0) is
getting a little long so I'm starting a related one specific to litprog.
I've made a start on rethinking LP at
https://github.com/mobileink/codegenres/wiki/Rethinking-Literate-Programming
.
A few key points
Greg,
I can tell by the amount of work you've put into this document that this is
an earnest attempt at analysis and not trolling, so I'm going to give you
my earnest response: you are wrong on so many levels.
First, you seem to have several misconceptions about literate programming
in general
is there any answer to
why?.
A literate programming style isn't really the issue. The loss of
why? is the issue. Answering why? means that you have to
build up the background problem so people can understand why? the
code is a solution. In other words, you need to communicate the ideas
in some linear
For example, did you know that
the book/literate program Physically Based Rendering recently won a
Scientific and Technical Academy Award? (Yes, that's right, a literate
program won an Academy Award -- the Hollywood movie kind.)
An awesome book, by the
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Mark Engelberg mark.engelb...@gmail.comwrote:
In fact, Clojure has a number of features that actively hurt its
expressiveness relative to other modern languages:
BTW, that list was by no means exhaustive. In the past couple of hours
I've thought of a couple
Yep. Thanks for the patch, Ben. I had set
org-babel-default-header-args:clojure to '((:noweb . tangle)) in my
.emacs, so I was getting the benefit of automatic noweb expansion when
tangling (but not weaving). It's all fun and games until you break someone
else's setup! ;)
~Gary
On
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Gary Johnson gwjoh...@uvm.edu wrote:
I just put together a simple example repo on GitHub, containing a literate
programming solution to the Potter Kata (
http://codingdojo.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?KataPotter) using Emacs' org-babel
mode. You can check it out here
a
literate programming solution to the Potter Kata
(http://codingdojo.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?KataPotter) using Emacs'
org-babel mode. You can check it out here:
https://github.com/lambdatronic/org-babel-example
Also be sure to take a look at the canonical online org-babel docs:
http://orgmode.org
On 9/12/12 9:29 PM, Ben Mabey wrote:
Thanks for the great example Gary! I've been meaning to try org-babel
out for a while but never got around to it.
I just tried your example and when I run org-babel-tangle the code
blocks are not expanded into the source file, but rather the code
block
I just put together a simple example repo on GitHub, containing a literate
programming solution to the Potter Kata
(http://codingdojo.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?KataPotter) using Emacs' org-babel
mode. You can check it out here:
https://github.com/lambdatronic/org-babel-example
Also be sure
Il giorno 07/set/2012, alle ore 15:45, lambdatronic ha scritto:
Thanks, Tim. This looks great.
For those of you who don't want to go digging through the thread, here's the
summary:
Step 1. Download nrepl-0.1.4-preview from Marmalade or MELPA (depends on
clojure-mode 1.11).
Step 2.
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 6:42 PM, lambdatronic gwjoh...@uvm.edu wrote:
For those people (like myself) who do a lot of Literate Programming in
Emacs using Clojure and org-babel, migrating to nrepl and nrepl.el is
somewhat non-trivial. This is because the existing Clojure support in
org-babel (ob
Thanks, Tim. This looks great.
For those of you who don't want to go digging through the thread, here's
the summary:
Step 1. Download nrepl-0.1.4-preview from Marmalade or MELPA (depends on
clojure-mode 1.11).
Step 2. Add this code to your .emacs file:
;; Patch ob-clojure to work with nrepl
For those people (like myself) who do a lot of Literate Programming in
Emacs using Clojure and org-babel, migrating to nrepl and nrepl.el is
somewhat non-trivial. This is because the existing Clojure support in
org-babel (ob-clojure.el) relies on slime and swank-clojure when running
org-babel
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 9:42 AM, lambdatronic gwjoh...@uvm.edu wrote:
For those people (like myself) who do a lot of Literate Programming in
Emacs using Clojure and org-babel, migrating to nrepl and nrepl.el is
somewhat non-trivial. This is because the existing Clojure support in
org-babel (ob
.
You might find this of interest:
Literate Programming example with Clojure
http://youtu.be/mDlzE9yy1mk
It is a quick video of my normal literate programming workflow
(ignoring the usual git commits)
It shows 3 things:
1) Extracting Clojure from the book and rebuilding the book PDF
2) adding
to extract source from
a literate file. I had always been intrigued by literate programming and
your post especially inspired me to try it out.
I've now written a substantial amount of my project in Clojure in the
literate style. I'm using the HTML version of the literate syntax +
markdown and writing
excellent resources on this mailing list regarding
literate resources, but they are more based around the theory rather than
actual use.
Has anybody got any real world usage reports regarding using literate
programming in emacs? In particular, does paredit and slime work inside
UTC-10, Colin Yates wrote:
Hi all,
There are some excellent resources on this mailing list regarding literate
resources, but they are more based around the theory rather than actual use.
Has anybody got any real world usage reports regarding using literate
programming in emacs
that the source and PDF are at:
src: http://daly.axiom-developer.org/clojure.pamphlet
pdf: http://daly.axiom-developer.org/clojure.pdf
I have a quick video of my normal literate programming workflow
(ignoring the usual git commits).
It shows 3 things:
1) Extracting Clojure from the book and rebuilding
On 30 Jan 2012, at 17:07, daly wrote:
The key result was that I discovered what I call my personal
irreducible error rate. If I do 100 things I will make 3 errors.
This was independent of the task. So typing 100 characters has
3 wrong letters which were mostly caught while typing. Writing
the root cause.
Then I try to change what I do so the mistake cannot exist.
This changes the type of possible errors but the 3% is still
there. I just make more sophisticated, higher level errors.
I am hoping that Literate Programming will raise my errors
to truly epic proportions :-)
One of my
Colin Yates colin.ya...@gmail.com writes:
Has anybody got any real world usage reports regarding using literate
programming in emacs? In particular, does paredit and slime work inside
the clojure fragments when using org.babel for example?
For the update in Pallet docs [1], we've been
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:38 AM, Hugo Duncan duncan.h...@gmail.com wrote:
SLIME works fully within the code blocks. For example C-x C-e can be
used to evaluate expressions. Paredit also works.
My understanding is that unless you use C-c C-k to evaluate the entire
file (which I don't think works
Mark Engelberg mark.engelb...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:38 AM, Hugo Duncan duncan.h...@gmail.com wrote:
SLIME works fully within the code blocks. For example C-x C-e can be
used to evaluate expressions. Paredit also works.
My understanding is that unless you use C-c C-k to
I would love to see your .emacs setup around these tools.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first
Fogus mefo...@gmail.com writes:
I would love to see your .emacs setup around these tools.
I'll put together a blog post - my .emacs files could do with a cleanup,
so this sounds like a good excuse to get it done.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
them in detail with an eye toward finding what I know
is there.
Literate programming is both a source of errors and a help.
It is a source of errors because I have more typing to do
and will generate bad latex and meaningless sentences, as
well as the standard coding errors. So in some sense I
Here's a paper that might be interesting to folk discussing in this
thread: http://www.jstatsoft.org/v46/i03/paper
Cheers
U
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts
Hi Tim,
Personally if you have done or would be interested in doing a quick vid
cast of how you progress through your workflow, I think that would be very
interesting.
Regards,
Folcon
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this
On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 06:51 -0800, Folcon wrote:
Hi Tim,
Personally if you have done or would be interested in doing a quick
vid cast of how you progress through your workflow, I think that would
be very interesting.
Sort of extreme pair programming with everybody? :-)
There is no such
I know I would find it incredibly helpful, and would consider paying a
token sum of money (£5?)...
On 28 January 2012 15:04, daly d...@axiom-developer.org wrote:
On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 06:51 -0800, Folcon wrote:
Hi Tim,
Personally if you have done or would be interested in doing a quick
On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 15:27 +, Colin Yates wrote:
I know I would find it incredibly helpful, and would consider paying a
token sum of money (£5?)...
An amusing thought but no thanks.
Buy yourself a pint and swear you'll at least try to write
your next program in some form of literate
:
I know I would find it incredibly helpful, and would consider paying a
token sum of money (£5?)...
An amusing thought but no thanks.
Buy yourself a pint and swear you'll at least try to write
your next program in some form of literate programming.
At the next conj I'll buy you a pint
I think I could live with that :)...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe
The topic is literate programming in emacs, not eclipse ;).
The trivial amount of Clojure I have done so far has all been in emacs and
letting go of paredit, slime, and emacs in general is already pretty hard!
On 24 January 2012 03:06, daly d...@axiom-developer.org wrote:
For Eclipse I
With a little hacking, org-babel works with Clojure editing evaluation in
SLIME. I've been using it to write Clojure training materials.
You need the latest versions of org-mode, SLIME, and clojure-mode. My
.emacs has the relevant elisp snippets.
http://github.com/stuartsierra/dotfiles
-S
Thanks Stuart.
On 24 January 2012 14:18, Stuart Sierra the.stuart.sie...@gmail.com wrote:
With a little hacking, org-babel works with Clojure editing evaluation
in SLIME. I've been using it to write Clojure training materials.
You need the latest versions of org-mode, SLIME, and
Hi all,
There are some excellent resources on this mailing list regarding literate
resources, but they are more based around the theory rather than actual use.
Has anybody got any real world usage reports regarding using literate
programming in emacs? In particular, does paredit and slime
use.
Has anybody got any real world usage reports regarding using literate
programming in emacs? In particular, does paredit and slime work inside
the clojure fragments when using org.babel for example?
Finally - how are people finding practising TDD with literate programming?
I imagine
programming in emacs? In particular, does paredit and slime
work inside the clojure fragments when using org.babel for example?
I've been using literate programming for years in Axiom.
Basically I write in a buffer containing latex, my literate tool
of choice. I have a *shell* buffer open running
On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 07:18 -0800, Sam Ritchie wrote:
I've been wondering this as well -- I'm specifically curious about how
one might jump back and forth between literate source like this and
the REPL. I know you can evaluate code snippets into the repl; I'm
thinking of early steps like
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 5:14 AM, Colin Yates colin.ya...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anybody got any real world usage reports regarding using literate
programming in emacs? In particular, does paredit and slime work inside the
clojure fragments when using org.babel for example?
I had major problems
Excellent - very nice!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:19 AM, daly d...@axiom-developer.org wrote:
It accepts either noweb syntax for chunks, as in:
chunkname=
(this is lisp code)
@
A rather unfortunate choice of delimiter if you wanted to use this
with Clojure code, since Clojure code frequently has internal
I've only briefly scanned what I think is the relevant code in tangle.lisp
posted by Tim Daly, but it appears that the @ must be the first character
on a line, which with indenting I've never seen in a Clojure source file.
It would be a tiny change to make the @ required to be on a line by itself,
On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 16:17 -0500, Cedric Greevey wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:19 AM, daly d...@axiom-developer.org wrote:
It accepts either noweb syntax for chunks, as in:
chunkname=
(this is lisp code)
@
A rather unfortunate choice of delimiter if you wanted to use
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 6:23 PM, daly d...@axiom-developer.org wrote:
On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 16:17 -0500, Cedric Greevey wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:19 AM, daly d...@axiom-developer.org wrote:
It accepts either noweb syntax for chunks, as in:
chunkname=
(this is lisp code)
and Literate much more useful
to Eclipse users.
Based on CCW, or a de novo effort?
Ah. I was unaware of CCW although it has been mentioned here.
I don't use Eclipse. I was just following the principle that
advocacy is volunteering and, since I'm advocating doing
literate programming and the topic
and, since I'm advocating doing
literate programming and the topic is literate Clojure
under Eclipse, I felt I needed to set up some kind of
solution. I try to implement what I advocate (e.g. showing
tangle for lisp code and HTML code). Otherwise I'd be
expecting someone else to do stuff I
I was able to get org-babel evaluation working with Clojure. Requires
latest versions of Clojure mode, Org mode, and Lein. Check out my dotfiles
repo for examples.
https://github.com/stuartsierra/dotfiles
-S
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure
Andrew ache...@gmail.com writes:
Eric asks: The only function ob-clojure uses from swank-clojure is
swank:interactive-eval-region' (used with `slime-eval') in the
org-babel-execute:clojure' function. Which function would now be used
to evaluate a region of clojure code? Would
I found [1] from Eric Schulte which says to add certain package archives
such that ELPA finds swank-clojure... But what about the swank-clojure
elisp package being deprecated? (By the way, I do get further now... the
clojure code evaluates)
(setq package-archives
'((original.
Andrew ache...@gmail.com writes:
I found [1] from Eric Schulte which says to add certain package
archives such that ELPA finds swank-clojure... But what about the
swank-clojure elisp package being deprecated?
swank-clojure.el is definitely deprecated, but there could still be code
out there
Eric asks: The only function ob-clojure uses from swank-clojure is
`swank:interactive-eval-region' (used with `slime-eval') in the
`org-babel-execute:clojure' function. Which function would now be used to
evaluate a region of clojure code? Would `slime-eval-region' suffice?
--
You received
As you know, now I get
org-babel-execute:clojure:Cannot open load file: swank-clojure
The method org-babel-execute:clojure in my
.emacs.d/elpa/org-2029/ob-clojure.el file says (require 'swank-clojure).
Given that the swank-clojure elisp package is deprecated and should not be
used what
fine for a Clojure project.
J.
On Dec 22, 2011, at 10:14 PM, daly wrote:
On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 17:53 -0800, nchurch wrote:
Firstly, there really needs to be something like a Github for literate
programming.
What a great idea!
I'll see what I can do.
Tim Daly
--
You received
. in the database schema) or a program bug lurks.
The meta-issue is distinguishing communication from documentation.
Literate programming is about communication, not documentation.
Write with your audience in mind and assume that the audience is
NOT your shower committee (a shower committee
On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 20:19 -0800, nchurch wrote:
I'll do everything I can to help. I have tons of thoughts (as you
might guess); but I haven't demonstrated myself to be a great coder,
yet. I feel like I'm a coder who needs something like literate
programming to be great, so it's kind
I'll do everything I can to help. I have tons of thoughts (as you
might guess); but I haven't demonstrated myself to be a great coder,
yet. I feel like I'm a coder who needs something like literate
programming to be great, so it's kind of a chicken-and-egg problem.
I'm already partway
. The .tex files ARE the
literate program. By analogy, you seem to be asking something like
Please allow me to elucidate. In the literate programming tool I mentioned,
marginalia, the output is, in fact, raw HTML. A very kind gentlemen
involved with the project pointed me to the source code
or
insight with which I had not formerly possessed in the moments prior?
For in truth I have not been able to discern its helpfulness thereby.
Methinks thou hast conflated the spirit of literate programming,
intended as a communication medium between fellow traveling souls
on this dark road
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Damion Junk jun...@gmail.com wrote:
I have also been using Emacs/Org-mode/Babel/R lately, mostly as a way to
have easily modifiable write up and source code for assignments in
statistics courses. I suppose this is one valid use, but I'm using it less
to
Thanks for all the replies!
I'm trying midje first (keeping expectations in mind for later) as it seems
to support writing tests and then code (i.e. top down testing).
(This video https://github.com/marick/Midje/wiki/Top-down-testing was
useful, thanks for making it!)
In generating
1 - 100 of 207 matches
Mail list logo
