Re: Pedestal comparison to Sente/HTTPKit

2015-01-26 Thread Ryan Neufeld
Glad to hear you enjoyed the video. Anyone taking a look at Pedestal should feel free to hit us up on our Google Group (https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/pedestal-users) should they have any questions. On Monday, January 26, 2015 at 4:00:56 PM UTC-6, Mike Haney wrote: > > Forgot to mentio

Re: Pedestal comparison to Sente/HTTPKit

2015-01-26 Thread Julio Barros
Hi Mike, Thanks for the reply. Yes forgot to mention that there will also be a UI component to monitor the events and the status of the system. Thats why I was considering sente and push. Thanks again. Julio -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cloju

Pedestal comparison to Sente/HTTPKit

2015-01-26 Thread Mike Haney
Forgot to mention, as far as raw performance/latency of HTTP servers go, you can find a comparison here: https://github.com/ptaoussanis/clojure-web-server-benchmarks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email t

Pedestal comparison to Sente/HTTPKit

2015-01-26 Thread Mike Haney
I haven't had a chance to really dig into Pedestal yet, but Ryan Neufeld did a video sometime back that really opened my eyes to how Pedestal works: http://youtu.be/sFT_0v-iKVQ Pedestal is primarily focused on letting you provide your services (RESTful or otherwise) while still providing some

Pedestal comparison to Sente/HTTPKit

2015-01-26 Thread Julio Barros
Hi, I'm starting on a new api based (analytics and event logging) project that will get many http requests that I need to handle concurrently and with low latency. I'm trying to understand how Pedestal (service) and Sente w/ HTTPKit compare for this use. Has anyone written up experiences that