Correction on my original response: "The call to eval will be slow..."
Reify doesn't take up permgen space with each invocation, but eval will (at
least on < JVM 8).
Timothy
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Brian Guthrie wrote:
> Thanks for the advice, Timothy. I think this is probably much cl
Thanks for the advice, Timothy. I think this is probably much cleaner than
where I ended up, and good advice. I'll let you know how it goes.
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Timothy Baldridge
wrote:
> This is a situation where I reach for eval. Construct your reify call as
> if you were inside
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Timothy Baldridge
wrote:
> This is why I like component (https://github.com/stuartsierra/component).
> The nice thing about using this library is that it encourages you to break
> your application into self-contained components. Those components must then
> commun
This is why I like component (https://github.com/stuartsierra/component).
The nice thing about using this library is that it encourages you to break
your application into self-contained components. Those components must then
communicate via protocols, and the result is a modular system that's much
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Steven Deobald wrote:
> I don't have the answer for you, but I'm definitely curious what your use
> case is. Whatcha upto?
I've become a firm believer in using protocols to encapsulate operations
with side effects, but I don't know of any good test-framework-ag
This is a situation where I reach for eval. Construct your reify call as if
you were inside a macro, but instead of returning data from the macro, call
(eval form). The call to reify will be slow (and could cause permgen
problems), but if you wrap the form in a function you can cache the
function a
Okay, Brian. I'll bite. :)
I don't have the answer for you, but I'm definitely curious what your use
case is. Whatcha upto?
Steven Deobald -- ⌀ -- nilenso.com
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 7:18 PM, Brian Guthrie wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is there a good way to reify protocols programmatically, i.e., by p
Hi all,
Is there a good way to reify protocols programmatically, i.e., by passing
data structures rather than dropping down into a macro? reify bottoms out
in reify*, which doesn't help much.
Thanks,
Brian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" g
