I just noticed that the API link on the clojure web site brings up
documentation for the master branch of Clojure instead of 1.0.0. I
can't find the 1.0.0 docs anywhere either.
This is obviously a problem for 1.0.0 users, since the docs refer to
features that don't exist.
I think it would be good
I second this - since many of the IDE plugins bundle the clojure-1.0
jar, new users trying out Clojure (and IDEs) can't use all the
features listed in the docs, and it's hard to tell which is which.
Maybe we could at least add a 'added in version' to the new method
metadata?
On Dec 9, 4:48 am, Jar
Enhancing the doc tool so that we have versions for the multiple
branches (1.0, 1.1, master, new) is on my agenda.
Maybe there's a way that Rich could add a link to the old 1.0 doc in
the meantime.
I think that the "added in version" metadata tag is a good idea, at
least for clojure itself. Pytho
It (or something similar) is present in some of Sun's Javadocs, if I
recall correctly, and I frequently found it useful, because I kept a
bookmark on the 1.6 javadocs but sometimes had to write for 1.5 JVMs.
Mark
On Dec 9, 10:10 am, Tom Faulhaber wrote:
> Enhancing the doc tool so that we have v
Tom,
I like the idea of an "added in version", javadocs do it too. Perhaps
it could go in the metadata?
There is an issue to figure out, though. In the upgrade to 1.1, slurp
got a new arity. In JavaLand this would be a non issue, because the
new arity would have its own docs. However, in Cloju
