On Saturday, January 18, 2014 2:19:08 PM UTC-6, Stefan Kanev wrote:
>
> On 18/01/14, Alex Miller wrote:
> > I have some sympathy for this view of things as it was a question I had
> > while learning Clojure as well.
> >
> > The general justification for the current behavior is that the thing
Map keys need to be unique. Therefore, it's tidy for the symbol to be the
key to the destructuring map.
On Saturday, January 18, 2014 2:57:09 PM UTC-5, Alex Miller wrote:
>
> I have some sympathy for this view of things as it was a question I had
> while learning Clojure as well.
>
> The gener
On 18/01/14, Alex Miller wrote:
> I have some sympathy for this view of things as it was a question I had
> while learning Clojure as well.
>
> The general justification for the current behavior is that the thing being
> bound is always on the left and the expression defining it is always on the
I have some sympathy for this view of things as it was a question I had
while learning Clojure as well.
The general justification for the current behavior is that the thing being
bound is always on the left and the expression defining it is always on the
right.
On Saturday, January 18, 2014 3
With apologies for 3 questions in 1 day:
(def a {:foo {:cat 20
:dog 30}
:bar "hi"})
(let [{{cat :cat
dog :dog} :foo
bar :bar} a]
[cat dog bar])
(leth [{:foo {:cat cat
:dog dog}
:bar bar} a]
[cat dog bar])
I don't understand t
