Yes, after compiling this example and its raw Google Closure equivalent:
(ns bgcolor
(:require [goog.fx.dom :as fx-dom]))
(defn ^:export animate [elem start end]
(let [
anim (fx-dom/BgColorTransform. elem start end 2000)]
(.play anim (
After compilation through the Google
28k after gclosure compilation is not insane considering that cljs.core is
above 350K.
ClojureScript needs some runtime code afterall and that at some point cannot
get compressed/slashed away
endlessly. ClojureScript will take some footprint but the gclosure compiler
does a great job here
to
Hi Rich,
Zero footprint ?
If you ever approach that goal I suggest a name change like ClojureRTA (Clojure
Running on Thin Air:))
Luc P.
On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 20:25:43 -0400
Rich Hickey richhic...@gmail.com wrote:
That said, it is our intention to look at minimizing the base
footprint as far as
Are there plans to decrease the amount of js dependencies that ClojureScript
makes compared to the raw Google Closure?
Currently the difference in final js code size is about 28kb (5kb zipped) in
advanced mode for a simple example.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
After compilation through the Google compiler ?
On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 01:42:40 +0300
Sergey Didenko sergey.dide...@gmail.com wrote:
Are there plans to decrease the amount of js dependencies that
ClojureScript makes compared to the raw Google Closure?
Currently the difference in final js code
