On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 4:49 AM, ajuc aju...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15 Lis, 00:21, John Harrop jharrop...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 3:03 PM, ajuc aju...@gmail.com wrote:
I have to install java one more time, when I try to start java -
server, I get:
Error: no `server' JVM at
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 8:28 PM, Rich Hickey richhic...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 4:49 AM, ajuc aju...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15 Lis, 00:21, John Harrop jharrop...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 3:03 PM, ajuc aju...@gmail.com wrote:
I have to install java one more
On 15 Lis, 00:21, John Harrop jharrop...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 3:03 PM, ajuc aju...@gmail.com wrote:
I have to install java one more time, when I try to start java -
server, I get:
Error: no `server' JVM at `F:\Program Files\Java\jre6\bin\server
\jvm.dll
You need to
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 4:49 AM, ajuc aju...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15 Lis, 00:21, John Harrop jharrop...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 3:03 PM, ajuc aju...@gmail.com wrote:
I have to install java one more time, when I try to start java -
server, I get:
Error: no `server' JVM
That's very odd.
Rich needs to take a look at this. Letting a constant shouldn't have a
performance hit, IMO.
Could you test whether it's faster to use your complex data structure
directly in the function, anonymously at the point of use, or to yank it
from a global var?
Code (can you
2009/11/15 ajuc aju...@gmail.com:
That's very odd.
Rich needs to take a look at this. Letting a constant shouldn't have a
performance hit, IMO.
Could you test whether it's faster to use your complex data structure
directly in the function, anonymously at the point of use, or to yank it
Interesting. It looks like Clojure's missing a few obvious optimizations,
and is reconstructing the literal structure each time the function is
called, or each time the value is used if the literal is directly at point
of use.
On the other hand, deref of a global is not exactly blindingly fast
ajuc wrote:
I would like to somehow hide the global hilbert-map into my function,
but I can't see how to do that.
Is this possible? I know that I can just inert literal into my let,
but that degrades performance, when function is called many times.
I would like to have something like
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Alex Osborne a...@meshy.org wrote:
ajuc wrote:
I would like to somehow hide the global hilbert-map into my function,
but I can't see how to do that.
Is this possible? I know that I can just inert literal into my let,
but that degrades performance, when
John Harrop wrote:
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Alex Osborne a...@meshy.org
mailto:a...@meshy.org wrote:
ajuc wrote:
I would like to somehow hide the global hilbert-map into my function,
but I can't see how to do that.
Clojure's name gives a hint as to how do
On 16 Lis, 01:32, Alex Osborne a...@meshy.org wrote:
Clojure's name gives a hint as to how do this: use a closure. :-) Just
pull the let outside the defn:
(let [hilbert-map {...}]
(defn point-to-hilbert [...]
...))
Now it seems so obvious :).
I guess I don't think functional yet.
I would like to somehow hide the global hilbert-map into my function,
but I can't see how to do that.
Just put the literal directly into the function.
Is this possible? I know that I can just inert literal into my let,
but that degrades performance, when function is called many times.
The server VM is part of the standard JDK.
To use it you can either do
java -server
or
set environment variable JAVA_OPS like this on linux/OSX
export JAVA_OPTS=-server
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 6:19 AM, ajuc aju...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to somehow hide the global hilbert-map into my
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 6:19 AM, ajuc aju...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to somehow hide the global hilbert-map into my function,
but I can't see how to do that.
Just put the literal directly into the function.
Is this possible? I know that I can just inert literal into my let,
Eeeuw.
Was this with a Clojure literal in the let, or with a non-trivial
calculation using constants?
The only difference is literal map of maps in let form.
Full code here: http://clojure.pastebin.com/m17b8d69
I have to install java one more time, when I try to start java -
server, I get:
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 3:03 PM, ajuc aju...@gmail.com wrote:
I have to install java one more time, when I try to start java -
server, I get:
Error: no `server' JVM at `F:\Program Files\Java\jre6\bin\server
\jvm.dll
You need to use the one in F:\Program Files\Java\jdk6 instead.
I'm
Hello.
I've tried to translate nice Hilbert-curve-index calculating function
to clojure (http://blog.notdot.net/2009/11/Damn-Cool-Algorithms-
Spatial-indexing-with-Quadtrees-and-Hilbert-Curves).
I've got sth like that:
(def hilbert-map {
:a {[0 0] [0 :d], [0 1] [1 :a], [1 0] [3 :b], [1 1] [2
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 6:48 PM, ajuc aju...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello.
I've tried to translate nice Hilbert-curve-index calculating function
to clojure (http://blog.notdot.net/2009/11/Damn-Cool-Algorithms-
Spatial-indexing-with-Quadtrees-and-Hilbert-Curves).
I've got sth like that:
(def
18 matches
Mail list logo
