Re: new API webpage format

2009-12-23 Thread cej38
I found another missing function: fmap. I notice these things because still don't know Clojure very well, but I work with someone that does. Thus, as I have time to work on it, I end up spending a fair amount of time trying to figure out his code. -- You received this message because you are

Re: new API webpage format

2009-12-08 Thread Sean Devlin
(inc apply-219-to-1_1) On Dec 8, 1:57 am, Tom Faulhaber tomfaulha...@gmail.com wrote: It turns out the doc string for filter was dropped during a checkin earlier this year. I surprised no one noticed sooner (I guess everyone just knows how filter works). I have filed ticket 219 with a patch

Re: new API webpage format

2009-12-08 Thread Tom Faulhaber
Rich applied the patch this morning. Let me know if there are any other problems. On Dec 8, 6:13 am, Sean Devlin francoisdev...@gmail.com wrote: (inc apply-219-to-1_1) On Dec 8, 1:57 am, Tom Faulhaber tomfaulha...@gmail.com wrote: It turns out the doc string for filter was dropped during a

Re: new API webpage format

2009-12-08 Thread Howard Lewis Ship
I'd love to help out, but I'm overtaxed (Tapestry 5, Cascade, two clients, upcoming speaking training sessions). My plate is full. Still its great to see the docs broken up by namespace and accurate against the meta doc (the old process was manual, right?). I appreciate the work you've put into

new API webpage format

2009-12-07 Thread cej38
Hi, I am writing because there seem to be missing functions in the API webpage. The only one that I know for sure at the moment is the filter function. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to

Re: new API webpage format

2009-12-07 Thread Tom Faulhaber
By golly, you're right. I'll take a look at why. On Dec 7, 2:14 pm, cej38 junkerme...@gmail.com wrote: Hi,   I am writing because there seem to be missing functions in the API webpage.  The only one that I know for sure at the moment is the filter function. -- You received this message

Re: new API webpage format

2009-12-07 Thread Howard Lewis Ship
I still think it would be neat if there was some DHTML coolness to help narrow down the symbol names that come down the right side of the page. On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Tom Faulhaber tomfaulha...@gmail.com wrote: By golly, you're right. I'll take a look at why. On Dec 7, 2:14 pm, cej38

Re: new API webpage format

2009-12-07 Thread Tom Faulhaber
Yup, I heard that the first time :-) It's coming, but not right this sec. Tom On Dec 7, 4:57 pm, Howard Lewis Ship hls...@gmail.com wrote: I still think it would be neat if there was some DHTML coolness to help narrow down the symbol names that come down the right side of the page. On

Re: new API webpage format

2009-12-07 Thread ataggart
While we're throwing requests at Tom, it'd be nice if the special forms were included in the api. On Dec 7, 5:21 pm, Tom Faulhaber tomfaulha...@gmail.com wrote: Yup, I heard that the first time :-) It's coming, but not right this sec. Tom On Dec 7, 4:57 pm, Howard Lewis Ship

Re: new API webpage format

2009-12-07 Thread Garth Sheldon-Coulson
inc Thanks for the hard work. On 12/7/09, ataggart alex.tagg...@gmail.com wrote: While we're throwing requests at Tom, it'd be nice if the special forms were included in the api. On Dec 7, 5:21 pm, Tom Faulhaber tomfaulha...@gmail.com wrote: Yup, I heard that the first time :-) It's

Re: new API webpage format

2009-12-07 Thread Tom Faulhaber
It turns out the doc string for filter was dropped during a checkin earlier this year. I surprised no one noticed sooner (I guess everyone just knows how filter works). I have filed ticket 219 with a patch and hopefully we'll get it into 1.1. I didn't see any others missing, have you seen

Re: new API webpage format

2009-12-07 Thread Tom Faulhaber
I like that too. I'll have to think about how we'd do that. On Dec 7, 8:11 pm, ataggart alex.tagg...@gmail.com wrote: While we're throwing requests at Tom, it'd be nice if the special forms were included in the api. On Dec 7, 5:21 pm, Tom Faulhaber tomfaulha...@gmail.com wrote: Yup, I