I found another missing function: fmap.
I notice these things because still don't know Clojure very well, but
I work with someone that does. Thus, as I have time to work on it, I
end up spending a fair amount of time trying to figure out his code.
--
You received this message because you are su
I'd love to help out, but I'm overtaxed (Tapestry 5, Cascade, two
clients, upcoming speaking & training sessions). My plate is full.
Still its great to see the docs broken up by namespace and accurate
against the meta doc (the old process was manual, right?). I
appreciate the work you've put into
Rich applied the patch this morning.
Let me know if there are any other problems.
On Dec 8, 6:13 am, Sean Devlin wrote:
> (inc apply-219-to-1_1)
>
> On Dec 8, 1:57 am, Tom Faulhaber wrote:
>
> > It turns out the doc string for filter was dropped during a checkin
> > earlier this year. I surpris
(inc apply-219-to-1_1)
On Dec 8, 1:57 am, Tom Faulhaber wrote:
> It turns out the doc string for filter was dropped during a checkin
> earlier this year. I surprised no one noticed sooner (I guess everyone
> just knows how filter works).
>
> I have filed ticket 219 with a patch and hopefully we'
I like that too. I'll have to think about how we'd do that.
On Dec 7, 8:11 pm, ataggart wrote:
> While we're throwing requests at Tom, it'd be nice if the special
> forms were included in the api.
>
> On Dec 7, 5:21 pm, Tom Faulhaber wrote:
>
> > Yup, I heard that the first time :-)
>
> > It's c
It turns out the doc string for filter was dropped during a checkin
earlier this year. I surprised no one noticed sooner (I guess everyone
just knows how filter works).
I have filed ticket 219 with a patch and hopefully we'll get it into
1.1.
I didn't see any others missing, have you seen others?
inc
Thanks for the hard work.
On 12/7/09, ataggart wrote:
> While we're throwing requests at Tom, it'd be nice if the special
> forms were included in the api.
>
> On Dec 7, 5:21 pm, Tom Faulhaber wrote:
>> Yup, I heard that the first time :-)
>>
>> It's coming, but not right this sec.
>>
>> To
While we're throwing requests at Tom, it'd be nice if the special
forms were included in the api.
On Dec 7, 5:21 pm, Tom Faulhaber wrote:
> Yup, I heard that the first time :-)
>
> It's coming, but not right this sec.
>
> Tom
>
> On Dec 7, 4:57 pm, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
>
>
>
> > I still thin
Yup, I heard that the first time :-)
It's coming, but not right this sec.
Tom
On Dec 7, 4:57 pm, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
> I still think it would be neat if there was some DHTML coolness to
> help narrow down the symbol names that come down the right side of the
> page.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 7,
I still think it would be neat if there was some DHTML coolness to
help narrow down the symbol names that come down the right side of the
page.
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Tom Faulhaber wrote:
> By golly, you're right. I'll take a look at why.
>
> On Dec 7, 2:14 pm, cej38 wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
By golly, you're right. I'll take a look at why.
On Dec 7, 2:14 pm, cej38 wrote:
> Hi,
> I am writing because there seem to be missing functions in the API
> webpage. The only one that I know for sure at the moment is the
> filter function.
--
You received this message because you are subscr
Hi,
I am writing because there seem to be missing functions in the API
webpage. The only one that I know for sure at the moment is the
filter function.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@goo
12 matches
Mail list logo
