Hi,
I found that resolve does not work correctly (I guess) when it is
called from other thread than main:
e.g.
let define
(def zz 123)
and afterwords call:
(.start (new Thread #(println (resolve 'zz
for me it does not work (it returns nil)
Workaround is to write a kind of super-resolve
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 12:01 PM, kony kulakow...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I found that resolve does not work correctly (I guess) when it is
called from other thread than main:
e.g.
let define
(def zz 123)
and afterwords call:
(.start (new Thread #(println (resolve 'zz
for me it
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 6:01 AM, kony kulakow...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I found that resolve does not work correctly (I guess) when it is
called from other thread than main:
e.g.
let define
(def zz 123)
and afterwords call:
(.start (new Thread #(println (resolve 'zz
for me it
On Nov 24, 12:01 pm, kony kulakow...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I found that resolve does not work correctly (I guess) when it is
called from other thread than main:
I guess your new thread also has the root binding for *ns* the current
namespace, which apparently is core
user= (.start (new
Three concurrent replies. We'd be better off using locks :-)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
On 24 Lis, 18:07, Krukow karl.kru...@gmail.com wrote:
Three concurrent replies. We'd be better off using locks :-)
Three concurrent replies but each of them brings something new ;)
Thank you very much for all of them!
... what is the use case,... I am just working on some kind of process
On Nov 24, 9:45 pm, kony kulakow...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24 Lis, 18:07, Krukow karl.kru...@gmail.com wrote:
Three concurrent replies. We'd be better off using locks :-)
Three concurrent replies but each of them brings something new ;)
Thank you very much for all of them!
... what is the
