Looks OK to me. JIRA Ticket + patch please, thanks!
David
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Ivan Willig wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> While I was messing around with ClojureScript and nodejs this week, I
> noticed that the Google Closure compiler complains when JavaScript
> reserved words are used. New
I wasn't even aware of :output-file to be honest. Ticket + patch welcome.
Thanks,
David
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 9:39 PM, Timothy Pratley wrote:
> ./bin/cljsc hello.cljs '{:output-file "foo.js"}'
>
> fails
>
> The problem/fix is straightforward:
>
> (apply add-dependencies all-opts
> - (conc
./bin/cljsc hello.cljs '{:output-file "foo.js"}'
fails
The problem/fix is straightforward:
(apply add-dependencies all-opts
- (concat (if (coll? compiled) compiled [compiled])
+ (concat (if (satisfies? IJavaScript compiled) [compiled] compiled)
However I'm not entirely sure what the d
Hi list,
While I was messing around with ClojureScript and nodejs this week, I
noticed that the Google Closure compiler complains when JavaScript
reserved words are used. Newer versions of JavaScript engines allow
reserved words (like "static", "class") to be used as object
properties. The Closur
Very nice. Relatively easy to follow. Basically it's re-implementing the
drag-list behaviour in React. I had thought to re-use some existing code,
provided I could inform React that the DOM was changing. (This is the
approach used by the example in the fiddler, albeit with jquery instead of
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Thomas Heller wrote:
> Now if I could only convince everyone that closure JSModules should be
> used always since they are way more flexible.
>
> @david: I'll look into creating a patch but unfortunately I realized that
> cljs.closure is missing the extra part that
Now if I could only convince everyone that closure JSModules should be used
always since they are way more flexible.
@david: I'll look into creating a patch but unfortunately I realized that
cljs.closure is missing the extra part that you currently don't define "main"
namespaces and everything
Nice! At the moment I use Enlive to substitute/add the
Thanks!
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 3:44 AM, Timothy Pratley wrote:
> Patch is up for this:
> http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJS-615
> Additional details in the ticket description.
>
> Regards,
> Timothy
>
> --
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your fir
Feel free to open an enhancement ticket in JIRA w/ patch. Thanks!
David
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Thomas Heller wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I wrote a build library https://github.com/thheller/shadow-build which
> replaces cljs.closure and I'd like the see some of the stuff I did flow
> back into
Howdy,
I wrote a build library https://github.com/thheller/shadow-build which replaces
cljs.closure and I'd like the see some of the stuff I did flow back into core
cljs.
I wanted to start discussing some of the stuff I did since I feel the current
situation is "bad" for ClojureScript in gener
Patch is up for this:
http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJS-615
Additional details in the ticket description.
Regards,
Timothy
--
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gr
12 matches
Mail list logo
