On Friday, December 4, 2015 at 1:58:51 PM UTC+1, bpb...@gmail.com wrote:
> I haven't got an online example as it's for work, but it's quite easy to set
> up a component that evaluates code
Ok, thanks, so are you saying there are no examples yet, as I see that Reagent
has some examples already
On Tuesday, December 8, 2015 at 11:13:25 AM UTC+1, Vianney Stroebel (vibl)
wrote:
> Ok, I guess this idea is so stupid nobody even bothers saying it is. :-)
>
> Vianney
>
> On Thursday, December 3, 2015 at 3:40:56 PM UTC+1, Vianney Stroebel (vibl)
> wrote:
> > I posted an idea for a reactive
Ok, I guess this idea is so stupid nobody even bothers saying it is. :-)
Vianney
On Thursday, December 3, 2015 at 3:40:56 PM UTC+1, Vianney Stroebel (vibl)
wrote:
> I posted an idea for a reactive and faster alternative to Datascript:
>
> https://github.com/tonsky/datascript/issues/132
>
> It
I try something like:
(cljs/eval (cljs/empty-state)
(read-string s)
{:eval cljs/js-eval
:source-map true
:context:expr
:def-emits-var true
:ns my.namespace
}
(fn [result] result)))
but my.namespace seems to cause it
On Tuesday, December 8, 2015 at 12:25:24 AM UTC+1, ewen wrote:
> Would you also consider a patch to make the :main option to accept a
> collection of namespaces?
shadow-build is fine with that, expects it in fact. Not really sure why cljs
allows multiple :entries per :module but :main only
Thanks Colin and Fergal!
My question would be: has anyone tried something similar?
Namely:
- On the one hand, map-based indexes queryable with Datalog and/or Pull
queries? (I'm currently looking into the Om Next approach of normalizing any
data structure and making it queryable with Pull
I don’t think that logic holds.
Maybe more specific questions would elicit more response?
I don’t have any ‘dog in the game’ here, and maybe it really is a stupid idea
(I doubt it! though but haven’t formed an opinion yet!) but the lack of
responses doesn’t imply that, merely the cost of
Vianney, as one of the github commenters said, fork the repo and try it
out. I'd be happy to see Datascript improved. Please don't interpret
silence as any kind of judgement of your idea.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Vianney Stroebel (vibl) wrote:
> Ah, never mind.
>
>
Hi Guys,
I think ClojureScript deserves its own macros and eval.
Any plans to work on this?
Cheers,
Rafik
--
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups