On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 06:14:05PM -0400, Justin W. Flory wrote:
> On 04/21/2016 05:10 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> >On 04/21/2016 05:04 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> >>I can't make tonight's Magazine meeting, but I'm +1 to get this out
> >>ASAP. I've moved this article to Pending Review, but I alre
Hi all,
Somehow despite me sending this last night - this was published. How can
we prevent communication breakdowns like this in the future?
This was sent prior to or during the magazine meeting, if I'm not mistaken.
If there's *any* uncertainty around something like this, it should not
be publ
On 04/22/2016 09:44 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 06:14:05PM -0400, Justin W. Flory wrote: >> On
> 04/21/2016 05:10 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: >>> On 04/21/2016 05:04 PM, Paul
> W. Frields wrote: I can't make tonight's Magazine meeting, but I'm +1 to
> get this out >>>
On 04/22/2016 09:44 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> The article apparently was left in Scheduled status -- I moved it back
> to Pending Review status, and Patrick Uiterwijk kindly stripped it
> from the Fedora Planet so it wouldn't confuse anyone. It was out
> there for a few hours, though, FYI.
I g
On 21/04/16, Peter Robinson wrote:
> So heads up because I'm not sure we want docker broken again at GA for F-24.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322909
>
> The bug has been open since end of March and is on x86 and it appears
> F-24 docker binaries are broken so F-24 (and likely
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 09:59:40AM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Somehow despite me sending this last night - this was published. How can
> we prevent communication breakdowns like this in the future?
>
> This was sent prior to or during the magazine meeting, if I'm not mistaken.
>
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 10:20:13AM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> On 04/22/2016 09:44 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 06:14:05PM -0400, Justin W. Flory wrote: >> On
> > 04/21/2016 05:10 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: >>> On 04/21/2016 05:04 PM, Paul
> > W. Frields wrote: I can'
On 04/22/2016 11:58 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> * I will expect Joe B from the Cloud WG to tell us authoritatively
> through the *marketing* list exactly what should happen next, since
> he (correctly) raised the issue of ensuring zero confusion over
> publishing these articles.
>
> Ideally
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Kushal Das wrote:
> On 21/04/16, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> So heads up because I'm not sure we want docker broken again at GA for F-24.
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322909
>>
>> The bug has been open since end of March and is on x86 and it appe
>> > So heads up because I'm not sure we want docker broken again at GA for
>> > F-24.
>> >
>> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322909
>> >
>> > The bug has been open since end of March and is on x86 and it appears
>> > F-24 docker binaries are broken so F-24 (and likely other) image
On 22/04/16, Kushal Das wrote:
> On 21/04/16, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > So heads up because I'm not sure we want docker broken again at GA for F-24.
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322909
> >
> > The bug has been open since end of March and is on x86 and it appears
> > F-24 d
On Fri, 2016-04-22 at 21:16 +0530, Kushal Das wrote:
> On 21/04/16, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > So heads up because I'm not sure we want docker broken again at GA for F-24.
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322909
> >
> > The bug has been open since end of March and is on x86 and
On 22/04/16, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >> > So heads up because I'm not sure we want docker broken again at GA for
> >> > F-24.
> >> >
> >> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322909
> >> >
> >> > The bug has been open since end of March and is on x86 and it appears
> >> > F-24 docker bin
- Original Message -
> We do have F24 Atomic images, autocloud just fails to notice them.
> fedora_nightlies finds them just fine:
>
> https://www.happyassassin.net/nightlies.html
When I boot the latest F24 Atomic qcow2 image there (right
now "Fedora-Atomic-24-20160422
#155: Decide on post-GA update cadence for various deliverables
-+-
Reporter: maxamillion | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Future
Component: --- | Keywords: meeting
-
15 matches
Mail list logo
