Re: Don't overwrite Two Week Atomic (Ticket #147)

2016-08-25 Thread Dusty Mabe
On 08/25/2016 06:43 PM, Adam Miller wrote: > Hello all, > I just wanted to throw out a note to everyone that I've gotten a chance > to work on this[0] and pending some testing we should be good to go for next > Two Week Atomic Release ... however, this is going to cause issues where the >

Re: Proposal: for F26, move Cloud Base Image to Server WG

2016-08-25 Thread Chris Murphy
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 25 August 2016 at 13:34, Matthew Miller wrote: >> >> We've talked about this for a while, but let's make it formal. The plan >> is to transition from Cloud as a Fedora Edition to

Don't overwrite Two Week Atomic (Ticket #147)

2016-08-25 Thread Adam Miller
Hello all, I just wanted to throw out a note to everyone that I've gotten a chance to work on this[0] and pending some testing we should be good to go for next Two Week Atomic Release ... however, this is going to cause issues where the download link is broken for an unknown period of time

Re: Discussion on changing the name of Working Group

2016-08-25 Thread Dusty Mabe
On 08/25/2016 02:51 PM, Jason Brooks wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: >> >> Others have made some good comments in this thread. I'm really not as >> concerned with these specific questions. >> >> I think the deeper problem is that there needs to

Re: Discussion on changing the name of Working Group

2016-08-25 Thread Jason Brooks
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > On 08/24/2016 11:27 AM, Kushal Das wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> During Flock PRD discussion, a proposal was put up about changing the >> name of the WG to Atomic. We have few open questions from last week's >> meeting. I

Re: Discussion on changing the name of Working Group

2016-08-25 Thread Dusty Mabe
On 08/24/2016 11:27 AM, Kushal Das wrote: > Hi all, > > During Flock PRD discussion, a proposal was put up about changing the > name of the WG to Atomic. We have few open questions from last week's > meeting. I > will try to put those down here, if anyone wants to add to that list, or >

Re: Discussion on changing the name of Working Group

2016-08-25 Thread Josh Berkus
On 08/24/2016 08:07 PM, Colin Walters wrote: > One thing that has certainly been on my > mind is whether "Project Atomic" should dissolve more directly > into the distributions, a bit like how the "Modularity" effort is more > directly part of Fedora. I'm not sure though, because we still need >

Proposal: for F26, move Cloud Base Image to Server WG

2016-08-25 Thread Matthew Miller
We've talked about this for a while, but let's make it formal. The plan is to transition from Cloud as a Fedora Edition to Something Container Clustery (see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Objectives/ProjectFAO). But, we still need cloud as a _deploy target_. The FAO-container-thing will continue

Re: Atomic ISO images still using wrong tree

2016-08-25 Thread Dusty Mabe
On 08/25/2016 04:07 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> Adding rel-eng. They might be able to help us out more on this topic. > > Could you maybe add a little bit more information? Like what tree is > expected to be there etc? Presumably this is the two week release? > Hey Peter, Thanks for the

Re: Discussion on changing the name of Working Group

2016-08-25 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 08:07:08PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > One thing that has certainly been on my > mind is whether "Project Atomic" should dissolve more directly > into the distributions, a bit like how the "Modularity" effort is more > directly part of Fedora. I'm not sure though,

Re: Fedora 24 Atomic: Issue with /etc/os-release VARIANT_ID not being updated on Fedora 23 upgrade.

2016-08-25 Thread Charlie Drage
Hi all, Are we able to re-open the bugzilla ticket? I'm able to help in regards to fixing the building as well. I believe we only need to update /usr/lib/variant Charlie Drage PGP - 4096R/C037D617 http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get=0xDA227403C037D617 On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Jonathan

Re: Atomic ISO images still using wrong tree

2016-08-25 Thread Peter Robinson
> Adding rel-eng. They might be able to help us out more on this topic. Could you maybe add a little bit more information? Like what tree is expected to be there etc? Presumably this is the two week release? Peter > On 08/23/2016 10:09 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: >> The atomic ISO images are using