On 08/25/2016 06:43 PM, Adam Miller wrote:
> Hello all,
> I just wanted to throw out a note to everyone that I've gotten a chance
> to work on this[0] and pending some testing we should be good to go for next
> Two Week Atomic Release ... however, this is going to cause issues where the
>
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 25 August 2016 at 13:34, Matthew Miller wrote:
>>
>> We've talked about this for a while, but let's make it formal. The plan
>> is to transition from Cloud as a Fedora Edition to
Hello all,
I just wanted to throw out a note to everyone that I've gotten a chance
to work on this[0] and pending some testing we should be good to go for next
Two Week Atomic Release ... however, this is going to cause issues where the
download link is broken for an unknown period of time
On 08/25/2016 02:51 PM, Jason Brooks wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>>
>> Others have made some good comments in this thread. I'm really not as
>> concerned with these specific questions.
>>
>> I think the deeper problem is that there needs to
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
>
> On 08/24/2016 11:27 AM, Kushal Das wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> During Flock PRD discussion, a proposal was put up about changing the
>> name of the WG to Atomic. We have few open questions from last week's
>> meeting. I
On 08/24/2016 11:27 AM, Kushal Das wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> During Flock PRD discussion, a proposal was put up about changing the
> name of the WG to Atomic. We have few open questions from last week's
> meeting. I
> will try to put those down here, if anyone wants to add to that list, or
>
On 08/24/2016 08:07 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> One thing that has certainly been on my
> mind is whether "Project Atomic" should dissolve more directly
> into the distributions, a bit like how the "Modularity" effort is more
> directly part of Fedora. I'm not sure though, because we still need
>
We've talked about this for a while, but let's make it formal. The plan
is to transition from Cloud as a Fedora Edition to Something Container
Clustery (see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Objectives/ProjectFAO).
But, we still need cloud as a _deploy target_. The FAO-container-thing
will continue
On 08/25/2016 04:07 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> Adding rel-eng. They might be able to help us out more on this topic.
>
> Could you maybe add a little bit more information? Like what tree is
> expected to be there etc? Presumably this is the two week release?
>
Hey Peter,
Thanks for the
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 08:07:08PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> One thing that has certainly been on my
> mind is whether "Project Atomic" should dissolve more directly
> into the distributions, a bit like how the "Modularity" effort is more
> directly part of Fedora. I'm not sure though,
Hi all,
Are we able to re-open the bugzilla ticket?
I'm able to help in regards to fixing the building as well. I believe we
only need to update /usr/lib/variant
Charlie Drage
PGP - 4096R/C037D617
http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get=0xDA227403C037D617
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Jonathan
> Adding rel-eng. They might be able to help us out more on this topic.
Could you maybe add a little bit more information? Like what tree is
expected to be there etc? Presumably this is the two week release?
Peter
> On 08/23/2016 10:09 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>> The atomic ISO images are using
12 matches
Mail list logo