On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 06:20:09PM +, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
> dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following:
> ``
> A few users have been requesting this as of late: [mail thread]
> (https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/IADTY4BL3M3YBL
Am 03.02.2017 um 20:07 schrieb Thomas Mueller:
> Hi all
>
> Is this expected that the unreleased vagrant boxes are much bigger in size?
>
> 612.0MB 25-20170203.0
> 207.7MB 25-1.3
All right. I was looking at the wrong image! Never mind!
- Thomas
___
clo
Hi all
Is this expected that the unreleased vagrant boxes are much bigger in size?
612.0MB 25-20170203.0
207.7MB 25-1.3
- Thomas
Fedora-Atomic-Vagrant-25-20170203.0.x86_64.vagrant-virtualbox.box
2017-02-03 06:07 612M
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/twoweek/Fedora-Atomic-25-2
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
sounds good to me. Others will chime in from the mailing list if they care.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/199
___
cloud ma
On 02/03/2017 12:21 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 10:41:38AM -0600, Joe Doss wrote:
>> I was talking on IRC with Dusty and he said this topic would be good
>> for the mailing list. What would it take to get an updated cloud
>> image beyond the first image that comes out when
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
A few users have been requesting this as of late: [mail thread]
(https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/IADTY4BL3M3YBL7QKOTYNRR54DOP6XHB/)
@mattdm had some questions in [this
mail](https
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 10:41:38AM -0600, Joe Doss wrote:
> I was talking on IRC with Dusty and he said this topic would be good
> for the mailing list. What would it take to get an updated cloud
> image beyond the first image that comes out when a new version of
> Fedora ships?
So, we are already
robyduck added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
It doesn't make any difference if you want to update the images hourly or
daily. It's probably easier for us to put them into the same script and get
them all (stable and prerelease).
I'm fine with a prerelease page and a final Fedor
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
thanks - we'll wait and confirm the images are built and working and then close
this.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/173
_
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
i would say we have a pre-release page and then switch the website over on "F26
big release" day
The pre-release page for f26 atomic could just get updated once a day to list
the latest nightly image that was built. WDYT?
``
To r
vinzentm added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
PR's are merged.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/173
___
cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe se
Am 03.02.2017 um 09:43 schrieb Thomas Mueller:
> Hi Dusty
>
> Am 31.01.2017 um 19:05 schrieb Dusty Mabe
>
>> On 01/30/2017 04:00 PM, Thomas Mueller wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Wasn't the fedora/25-cloud-base updated too?
>>>
>>> https://atlas.hashicorp.com/fedora/boxes/25-cloud-base lists v20161122
>>>
Am 03.02.2017 um 17:41 schrieb Joe Doss:
> ...
>
> Even with an updated package using the current Fedora Cloud base users
> most likely will still have a problem
> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401561#c57 details out
> the possible edge case) due to outdated selinux-policy package
Hey folks!
I was talking on IRC with Dusty and he said this topic would be good for
the mailing list. What would it take to get an updated cloud image
beyond the first image that comes out when a new version of Fedora ships?
Here is some end user context. My org uses Fedora Cloud in productio
mattdm added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
_I_ think it makes sense to have that on a prerelease page, but I'll let others
weigh in too.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/199
vinzentm added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
I think a locked root account is a good security measure.
excerpt from https://www.vagrantup.com/docs/boxes/base.html:
> Vagrant does not actually use or expect any root password. However,
> having a generally well known root passwo
mattdm added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
I think that we should start producing prelease images immediately at the
branch (later this month — 2017-02-21) as part of the two-week process. I don't
think there should be specific Alpha/Beta builds.
``
To reply, visit the link be
robyduck reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are
following:
``
With F25 Atomic replaced definitely Cloud as Fedora edition, and is now the
only "cloud" set on getfedora.org.
Until F25 there was never any plan to produce prerelease images (Alpha/Beta),
but now, as it
vinzentm added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
created a PR for rawhide: https://pagure.io/fedora-kickstarts/pull-request/126
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/173
___
cloud m
jasonbrooks added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
+1 to alignment w/ rhel/centos -- even if we some day have other refs, the
"standard" atomic host is the container-hosting one.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/198
__
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 03:19:47PM +0100, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> > Part of that might be self-reenforcing, as there haven't been enough
> > downloads of Atomic yet to bump it to the front page when you search
> > for "Fedora".
> Google Search: Fedora Atomic
I meant here:
https://atlas.hashicorp.
miabbott added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
Could we align with what RHEL and CentOS do? Or is there value in preserving
the `container-host` nomenclature?
RHEL uses the following branch: `rhel-atomic-host/7/x86_64/standard`
CentOS uses this: `centos-atomic-host/7/x86_64/s
I can't make it ot the meeting today Sorry!
Zack Cylinder
Cloudbakers
Cloud Training Specialist
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 8:28 AM,
wrote:
> Send cloud mailing list submissions to
> cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via email, send a message with subject or
> bod
vinzentm added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
is there a git repo holding build scripts of the vagrant boxes where I can file
a PR to fix this?
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/173
___
> I think what he was alluding to is that if you search for fedora on
> Atlas [1] then you don't see atomic, which means that the cloud base
> images could be getting selected because people don't know they are
> there. This is because they are sorted by # of downloads, which is
> fine.
>
> [1]
On 02/03/2017 09:19 AM, Thomas Mueller wrote:
>
>
> Am 03.02.2017 um 14:41 schrieb Matthew Miller:
>> On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 09:43:47AM +0100, Thomas Mueller wrote:
>>> Also download numbers on atlas indicate more interest for cloud-base
>>> than atomic for vagrant.
>> Part of that might be se
Am 03.02.2017 um 14:41 schrieb Matthew Miller:
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 09:43:47AM +0100, Thomas Mueller wrote:
>> Also download numbers on atlas indicate more interest for cloud-base
>> than atomic for vagrant.
> Part of that might be self-reenforcing, as there haven't been enough
> downloads o
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 09:43:47AM +0100, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> Also download numbers on atlas indicate more interest for cloud-base
> than atomic for vagrant.
Part of that might be self-reenforcing, as there haven't been enough
downloads of Atomic yet to bump it to the front page when you searc
trishnag added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
@dustymabe ACK! I have the PR ready for the test
https://github.com/kushaldas/tunirtests/pull/58
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/173
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
trishnag, currently still the same - it won't matter if we fix it now because
we have not been releasing cloud base images so even if we fix it it would not
get released for the cloud base image until f26. That is unless we decide t
Hi Dusty
Am 31.01.2017 um 19:05 schrieb Dusty Mabe
> On 01/30/2017 04:00 PM, Thomas Mueller wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Wasn't the fedora/25-cloud-base updated too?
>>
>> https://atlas.hashicorp.com/fedora/boxes/25-cloud-base lists v20161122
>> (last release 2 months ago).
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Unfortunately
31 matches
Mail list logo
