Re: Atomic openQA result emails ('compose check report')

On 03/17/2017 06:23 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi folks! > > So Colin and I had a bit of a chat about openQA Atomic testing > 'integration', and one of the things that came up was the state of the > 'compose check report' emails for Atomic tests. > > If you're signed up to test@ or devel@

[atomic-wg] Issue #259 `testing cloud-init 0.7.9 in Fedora 25`

dustymabe reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` If we are able to move from 0.7.8 to 0.7.9 version of cloud-init in Fedora 25 we will be able to add support for another cloud provider. I've been told by @larsks that 0.7.9 fixes a lot of bugs and we

Re: Meeting about rolling releases

On 03/17/2017 01:36 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > On 03/16/2017 04:28 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: >> Folks, >> >> For anyone who's interested, we'll be having a meeting about Rolling >> Releases (vs. versioned releases). This is just to get some face-time >> for the discussion of how rolling releases

Re: Meeting about rolling releases

On 03/16/2017 04:28 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: > Folks, > > For anyone who's interested, we'll be having a meeting about Rolling > Releases (vs. versioned releases). This is just to get some face-time > for the discussion of how rolling releases would work, what they mean, > and when we'll be

[atomic-wg] Issue #231 `clarify meaning of "rolling" for future fedora atomic releases`

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` We met today to discuss what a rolling release would look like for fedora atomic host. The notes from the [etherpad](https://public.etherpad-mozilla.org/p/20170317-FAH-rollingrelease) we used during the meeting are attached

Re: Meeting about rolling releases

On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: > Hi Josh, > > is there going to be a recording ? I will not be able to attend, > however I am interested to hear the discussion. > +1 to recording. I won't be able to attend the meeting as well. -- Regards, Trishna Guha

Re: Meeting about rolling releases

On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 6:44 AM, Colin Walters wrote: > I can maybe attend this but I already have a lot of meetings today > and I'd like to write some code. > > My feelings on this are basically: > > 1) I wrote on an issue I can't find now, but I was basically suggesting: >

[atomic-wg] Issue #256 `atomic command changes: prefer file over label`

ttomecek added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @baude thanks for feedback! From the blog post: This file will be submitted with the image proposal, and will be included bout inside the container image and available online from fedoraproject.org. The Help label will

[atomic-wg] Issue #256 `atomic command changes: prefer file over label`

baude added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` The https://github.com/projectatomic/ContainerApplicationGenericLabels definition of the HELP label for images is defined as "Command to run the help command of the image". The way Atomic CLI help was designed was as follows: * If a

Re: Meeting about rolling releases

I can maybe attend this but I already have a lot of meetings today and I'd like to write some code. My feelings on this are basically: 1) I wrote on an issue I can't find now, but I was basically suggesting: ln -s fedora/26/x86_64/atomic-host fedora/stable/x86_64/atomic-host in the repo

Re: Meeting about rolling releases

On 03/17/2017 01:13 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: > Hi Josh, > > is there going to be a recording ? I will not be able to attend, > however I am interested to hear the discussion. > We can try to record it, but will need to make sure attendees are comfortable being recorded first. Dusty

Re: Meeting about rolling releases

On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 01:28:00PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: > For anyone who's interested, we'll be having a meeting about Rolling > Releases (vs. versioned releases). This is just to get some face-time > for the discussion of how rolling releases would work, what they mean, > and when we'll be