On 02/04/2016 03:35 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 02:24:12PM -0800, Hannes Schmidt wrote:
>> I'm not asking for the images to be continually supported. Just not
>> deleted. Maybe they can be placed into a separate "archive" AWS account?
> I don't think there's a way to do
Thank you for the PR, Kushal. I will soon merge it.
I'm a little confused right now. When my CI build was failing the day
before yesterday because it didn't find an AMI for 21, I looked for it
manually and didn't find any. I can see ami-15326925 now but it shows a
creation date of February 2,
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 10:29:26PM -0800, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
> That aside, let's be realistic here: storing 3GB of snapshot data
> in all ten EC2 regions costs $3.04 per month. Even after accounting
> for two architectures and the past few releases' PV-vs-HVM split, I
> could host every
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 11:56:59AM -0800, Hannes Schmidt wrote:
> > Which AMI ID are you looking for, in which regions? We had a problem
> Fedora 21 for HVM in us-west-2. I can dig up the AMI ID if you'd like. Id'
> have to look at our past CI builds. This is how we're searching for them:
>
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 02:24:12PM -0800, Hannes Schmidt wrote:
> I'm not asking for the images to be continually supported. Just not
> deleted. Maybe they can be placed into a separate "archive" AWS account?
I don't think there's a way to do this without changing the AMI id.
That's certainly
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 10:37:05AM +0100, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> > So EOL implies that no one should ever be able to launch a VM for it?
> > Makes no sense to me.
> It's no longer receiving updates, so that does actually make sense.
> Can you describe the use case for an EOL release that might
Hi Hannes,
Fedora-21 is now EOL. So, it makes complete sense to me these images
are already not available.
Regards,
Jan
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 3:19 AM, wrote:
> What is the motivation for the eager deletion of the official Fedora VM
> images (AMIs) from EC2? The image for 21
On 02/03/2016 09:24 AM, Hannes Schmidt wrote:
>
> So EOL implies that no one should ever be able to launch a VM for it?
> Makes no sense to me.
It's no longer receiving updates, so that does actually make sense.
Can you describe the use case for an EOL release that might persuade us
that we
Hi Jan,
So EOL implies that no one should ever be able to launch a VM for it? Makes
no sense to me.
-- Hannes
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 12:00 AM, Jan Kurik wrote:
> Hi Hannes,
>
> Fedora-21 is now EOL. So, it makes complete sense to me these images
> are already not available.
I'm not asking for the images to be continually supported. Just not
deleted. Maybe they can be placed into a separate "archive" AWS account?
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Matt Micene wrote:
> The transparency argument does make sense, but yes then the "stock Fedora
> AMI"
The transparency argument does make sense, but yes then the "stock Fedora
AMI" is dependent on the projects update and lifecycle policy.
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Hannes Schmidt wrote:
> We do take images of fully set-up VMs that are used in experiments. But
> there is
On 2016-02-03 1:37, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
On 02/03/2016 09:24 AM, Hannes Schmidt wrote:
So EOL implies that no one should ever be able to launch a VM for it?
Makes no sense to me.
It's no longer receiving updates, so that does actually make sense.
>
Can you describe the use case for an EOL
>
> big data genomics community where an experiment that can't be verified by
> a 2nd party is a bad experiment. Like everywhere in science. VMs are a
> great way to provide that reproducibility.
Have you looked at AMI snapshots for reproducing experiment environments?
Once the baseline
Whether something makes sense is subjective.
But as to your 2nd point. One word: Reproducibility. I am in the big data
genomics community where an experiment that can't be verified by a 2nd
party is a bad experiment. Like everywhere in science. VMs are a great way
to provide that reproducibility.
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 1:40 AM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 02:19:19AM -, han...@ucsc.edu wrote:
> > What is the motivation for the eager deletion of the official Fedora
> > VM images (AMIs) from EC2? The image for 21 is already gone even
> >
What is the motivation for the eager deletion of the official Fedora VM images
(AMIs) from EC2? The image for 21 is already gone even though it is not even
two years old. Ubuntu is keeping the images around much longer.
___
cloud mailing list
16 matches
Mail list logo