On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 17:03 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016, at 04:45 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > I will note that I filed
>> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331864 - an unavoidable
>> > crash
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 05:03:21PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> In this case, it's a combination of routing issue and bandwidth; the routing
> issue here is that the people who watch the `anaconda` bugzilla entries don't
> currently intersect much with Atomic Host. In general, please add me to
>
On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 17:03 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016, at 04:45 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> >
> > I will note that I filed
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331864 - an unavoidable
> > crash when installing from the Atomic installer image - in *April*, a
On 26 August 2016 at 16:45, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 14:27 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 04:43:50PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> >
>> > There are a lot of images being produced and I have no idea if they're
>> > really needed. That a release blockin
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016, at 04:45 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I will note that I filed
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331864 - an unavoidable
> crash when installing from the Atomic installer image - in *April*, and
> no-one appears to care that the Atomic installer image has been br
On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 14:27 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 04:43:50PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >
> > There are a lot of images being produced and I have no idea if they're
> > really needed. That a release blocking image (cloud base qcow2) nearly
> > caused F25 alpha to
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 04:43:50PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> There are a lot of images being produced and I have no idea if they're
> really needed. That a release blocking image (cloud base qcow2) nearly
> caused F25 alpha to slip because it was busted at least suggests it
> probably shouldn't
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 25 August 2016 at 13:34, Matthew Miller wrote:
>>
>> We've talked about this for a while, but let's make it formal. The plan
>> is to transition from Cloud as a Fedora Edition to Something Container
>> Clustery (see https://fedorap
We've talked about this for a while, but let's make it formal. The plan
is to transition from Cloud as a Fedora Edition to Something Container
Clustery (see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Objectives/ProjectFAO).
But, we still need cloud as a _deploy target_. The FAO-container-thing
will continue