"Sandro \"red\" Mathys" writes:
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> "Sandro \"red\" Mathys" writes:
>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 7:32 PM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> So we have the RedHatQE tests, Taskotron and CentOS's CI. Can anyone
> of the people involved (a
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Tim Ski wrote:
> I said I would help with this but someone else took the lead. What's the 411
> haha???
Where did you say so? I haven't seen any such message and neither did
the cloud list's archive. Anyway, what exactly would you like to help
with?
> On Apr 4, 20
I said I would help with this but someone else took the lead. What's the
411 haha???
On Apr 4, 2014 12:34 AM, "Sandro "red" Mathys"
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> > "Sandro \"red\" Mathys" writes:
> >
> >> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 7:32 PM, Vitaly Kuznetsov
> w
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> "Sandro \"red\" Mathys" writes:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 7:32 PM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
So we have the RedHatQE tests, Taskotron and CentOS's CI. Can anyone
of the people involved (at the Red Hat side, I guess) well me why
On Fri, 7 Mar 2014 19:46:28 +0900
"Sandro \"red\" Mathys" wrote:
> >> When I took ownership of this "external
> >> need" (for the Fedora cloud product) I was under the impression we
> >> only just (are going to) have Taskotron and everyone knows it's THE
> >> way to go.
> >
> > I personally lov
On Fri, 7 Mar 2014 18:46:49 +0900
"Sandro \"red\" Mathys" wrote:
> So we have the RedHatQE tests, Taskotron and CentOS's CI. Can anyone
> of the people involved (at the Red Hat side, I guess) well me why we
> have 3 systems for 1 task? When I took ownership of this "external
> need" (for the Fe
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 07:46:28PM +0900, Sandro red Mathys wrote:
> That's why I was a bit confused to find there's actually 3 systems.
> Collaboration is certainly great, but that's not how it's done so
> let's try to improve on this.
Speaking without any sort of officialness, I think the split
"Sandro \"red\" Mathys" writes:
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 7:32 PM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>>> So we have the RedHatQE tests, Taskotron and CentOS's CI. Can anyone
>>> of the people involved (at the Red Hat side, I guess) well me why we
>>> have 3 systems for 1 task?
>>
>> (my personal opinion) I
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 3:50 AM, Frankie wrote:
> I would love to assist with this.
> Kindly let me know how I can be of best use.
Frankie, if you feel up to it, helping with the Taskotron development
as mentioned in the first post would be highly appreciated. See also
Tim Flink's post (the one ri
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 7:32 PM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> So we have the RedHatQE tests, Taskotron and CentOS's CI. Can anyone
>> of the people involved (at the Red Hat side, I guess) well me why we
>> have 3 systems for 1 task?
>
> (my personal opinion) I think we rather have plenty of tasks, no
"Sandro \"red\" Mathys" writes:
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> "Sandro \"red\" Mathys" writes:
>>
>>> Heads-up: I've taken ownership for the external need "Automatic
>>> Smoketests on Image Build" [0]
>>>
>>> Testing an image takes time and resources, and with seve
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> "Sandro \"red\" Mathys" writes:
>
>> Heads-up: I've taken ownership for the external need "Automatic
>> Smoketests on Image Build" [0]
>>
>> Testing an image takes time and resources, and with several images, it
>> takes several times that
"Sandro \"red\" Mathys" writes:
> Heads-up: I've taken ownership for the external need "Automatic
> Smoketests on Image Build" [0]
>
> Testing an image takes time and resources, and with several images, it
> takes several times that. Since that simply doesn't scale - well,
> doesn't even work wel
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 06:44:29PM -0700, Tim Flink wrote:
> To go into a bit more detail, the taskotron bits which would be
> required would depend a little bit on what comes out of the cloud image
> generation.
> I'm assuming the following:
> - the image creation process will generate a fedmsg u
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 20:58:32 +0900
"Sandro \"red\" Mathys" wrote:
> Heads-up: I've taken ownership for the external need "Automatic
> Smoketests on Image Build" [0]
>
> Testing an image takes time and resources, and with several images, it
> takes several times that. Since that simply doesn't sca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I would love to assist with this.
Kindly let me know how I can be of best use.
Kind Regards,
On 03/05/2014 02:58 PM, Sandro "red" Mathys wrote:
> Heads-up: I've taken ownership for the external need "Automatic
> Smoketests on Image Build" [0]
>
>
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 6:58 AM, Sandro red Mathys
wrote:
Heads-up: I've taken ownership for the external need "Automatic
Smoketests on Image Build" [0]
Testing an image takes time and resources, and with several images, it
takes several times that. Since that simply doesn't scale - well,
doesn'
On 03/05/2014 05:55 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> - Checking cloud-init and systemctl for bootup errors - does that make
>> sense or is there too much noise?
>
> I started a related list at https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/4
>
How can we work on this in a manner to sync with the CentOS effor
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 08:58:32PM +0900, Sandro red Mathys wrote:
> past) are probably:
> - Was the IP correctly set up?
> - Is SSH running and reachable?
> - Does the fedora user exist?
> - Is the ssh pubkey installed for the fedora user?
> - Is the fedora user able to use sudo?
> - Is the root a
19 matches
Mail list logo
