in the IRC channel, I am advised by 'msavy' that Boxgrinder is
on a path to end as a project, and transition into:
http://imgfac.org/
which uses underneath: oz
https://github.com/clalancette/oz
Seemingly also, the former (and somewhat broken)
appliance-creator goes away
My go
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012, David Busby wrote:
I think you'll find it hard to get any traction here kickstarts especially
in the "cloud front" are used increasingly less in favour of bootstrapping
an instance with puppet / chef for provisioning above and beyond the base
os.
well known, but the non-i
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:15 AM, R P Herrold wrote:
> in the IRC channel, I am advised by 'msavy' that Boxgrinder is on a path to
> end as a project, and transition into:
> http://imgfac.org/
>
> which uses underneath: oz
> https://github.com/clalancette/oz
>
> Seemingly also, the
On 12/18/2012 11:15 AM, R P Herrold wrote:
>
>
> I think those 'cloud' working groups are solving the wrong problem at
> the wrong place, [some want JEOS to include a listening sshd, and
> package install tool; others want rsync, or man, or more, or less ...
> the preferences never end and there is
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:32:09AM -0500, Andy Grimm wrote:
> +1 ... those conversations are mostly just bikeshedding. In an ideal
> world, users will be comfortable enough with image building that
> having an "official" image will be mostly meaningless. I think that
> the world of cloud users is
On 12/18/2012 12:38 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
>
> I am generally aware of it as a project, and I think follow a blog on
> the matter, but not a mailing list. I'll remedy that and read for a
> bit. But packaging Ruby has been a 'bear' and seemed to be 'not well
> solved' yet. I have no aversion to R
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:15:53AM -0500, R P Herrold wrote:
> I think those 'cloud' working groups are solving the wrong problem
> at the wrong place, [some want JEOS to include a listening sshd, and
I think right now, we need to do both.
--
Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁
__
I completely agree with this. I didn't mean for it to seem otherwise.
-steve
On Dec 18, 2012, at 2:03 PM, cloud-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
> --
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 20:03:51 +
> From: Tim Bell
> To: Fedora Cloud SIG ,
> "her
Hi Russ,
I think you'll find it hard to get any traction here kickstarts especially
in the "cloud front" are used increasingly less in favour of bootstrapping
an instance with puppet / chef for provisioning above and beyond the base
os.
The tdl format is somewhat of a stop gap between kickstarts
