Re: image architecture -- probably no 32-bit for docker, big data?

On 04/30/2014 11:55 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: I know we discussed keeping the 32-bit image around, but I don't think we actually covered the specialized images. Docker doesn't even support 32 bit hosts -- it may someday, but even then, the assumption of most containers is gonna be 64-bit x86_64.

Re: image architecture -- probably no 32-bit for docker, big data?

Agreed, it doesn't make sense to keep 32bit images for these. On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Sam Kottler wrote: > On 2014-04-30 21:55, Matthew Miller wrote: > >> I know we discussed keeping the 32-bit image around, but I don't think we >> actually covered the specialized images. >> >> Docker

Re: image architecture -- probably no 32-bit for docker, big data?

On 2014-04-30 21:55, Matthew Miller wrote: I know we discussed keeping the 32-bit image around, but I don't think we actually covered the specialized images. Docker doesn't even support 32 bit hosts -- it may someday, but even then, the assumption of most containers is gonna be 64-bit x86_64.

image architecture -- probably no 32-bit for docker, big data?

I know we discussed keeping the 32-bit image around, but I don't think we actually covered the specialized images. Docker doesn't even support 32 bit hosts -- it may someday, but even then, the assumption of most containers is gonna be 64-bit x86_64. And I don't think it makes sense to have a 32-