Review Request: ec2-register: need better error handling for negative cases.

2012-07-20 Thread Likitha Shetty
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6059/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prachi Damle. Description --- The

Network VPC Site-to-site VPN issue

2012-07-20 Thread Olga Smola
HI, I've just set up CS environment using DevCloud. When I was making some UI tests, I've noticed that if go to Network/Select VPC/Click Edit for VPC1(or any)/Click on Site-to-site VPN from Config drop-down/, I get an error and an empty section. Look at the attached screenshot. Does any body

RE: Network VPC Site-to-site VPN issue

2012-07-20 Thread Pranav Saxena
Hi Olga , The screenshot doesn't get attached when you send a mail to these aliases. You might want to upload it somewhere and provide the link for it. Anyways , I tried to reproduce what you mentioned but I did not happen to encounter such an error and I did not come across any empty fields.

Re: Network VPC Site-to-site VPN issue

2012-07-20 Thread Olga Smola
Hi Pranav, Could you please take a look at screenshots below: http://prntscr.com/ce913 http://prntscr.com/ce921 http://prntscr.com/ce933 Thanks, Olga On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Pranav Saxena pranav.sax...@citrix.comwrote: Hi Olga , ** ** The screenshot doesn’t get attached when

RE: Backup Products

2012-07-20 Thread Rajesh Battala
We can have a Backup And Recovery Solution for the VM's. That feature will actually use the Snapshot mechanisms to provide the backup and restore. The other option is to take the clone of the entire VM at different stages and preserve it in backup store. But to clone the VM it should be stopped

Support for Citrix StorageLink in Cloudstack

2012-07-20 Thread Lucas Hughes
Hello, We are using CloudStack in an environment with Citrix Xen (Enterprise Edition) and Dell EqualLogic SANs. We are trying to take advantage of Citrix Storage Link features, especially the feature that allows to have a thin provisioned volume/LUN on the SAN per Vitrual Machine, rather

Re: Backup Products

2012-07-20 Thread Kelceydamage@bbits
I have found success with using a combo of templates/snapshots and BackupPC on the guests. This way in a worse case scenario I can roll out a template or even ISO install and re-image the guest from BackupPC is snapshots fail or the original VM corrupts. In-fact having at least one backup

Re: Network VPC Site-to-site VPN issue

2012-07-20 Thread Alena Prokharchyk
Also for all UI related bugs, we have to attach Api request/response (in Firefox you can catch it with Firebug; there should be similar plugin for Chrome). -Alena. On 7/20/12 4:06 AM, Olga Smola olya.sm...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Pranav, Could you please take a look at screenshots below:

RE: Support for Citrix StorageLink in Cloudstack

2012-07-20 Thread Edison Su
Copy_vhd_from_secondary: 1. take three parameters: the url of template: e.g. nfs://your-secondary-storage/path/templatename.vhd, dest primary storage sr uuid name label of the to be created VHD 2. mount secondary storage 3. create a vhd file on primary storage 4. if the dest

Re: Update on wrapping DevCloud into a Vagrant Box

2012-07-20 Thread Chip Childers
Edison, A couple of questions for you: 1 - It looks like you are using password-based authentication for the scp command (changed in lib/vagrant/ssh.rb ). Am I reading that change correctly? I think we can get away with using the vagrant user and standard vagrant public / private keys

daemonize - shall we purge?

2012-07-20 Thread David Nalley
Hi folks, I keep hearing that daemonize isn't used at all anymore, yet it continues to live on - shall we purge it? --David

RE: daemonize - shall we purge?

2012-07-20 Thread Edison Su
The cloud-agent init script still depends on it. Wido is working on to get rid of it? -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 11:07 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: daemonize - shall we purge? Hi folks, I keep

Re: Conversations from OSCON

2012-07-20 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
Sent from my Samdung Galaxy S3 Apologies for any typos On Jul 20, 2012 8:40 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Hi folks I wanted to report back on some conversations that Kevin Kluge and I participated in at OSCON. We went to lunch with Justin Erenkrantz, Jim Jagielski, and Ross Gardler.

[DISCUSS] Binaries (jars) in our source tree/source releases.

2012-07-20 Thread David Nalley
In one of the OSCON discussions, I noted the recent polite discussion re binary jars in source releases on general@incubator. While this is apparently tolerated (if you don't mind wearing Nomex), it's considered a Bad Thing (TM) generally speaking. Folks suggested that we look at how subversion

Re: cloudbridge rpms/debs?

2012-07-20 Thread Sam Robertson
On 7/20/12 11:04 AM, Frank Zhang frank.zh...@citrix.com wrote: I think we can, for it's built with CloudStack now -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 10:55 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: cloudbridge rpms/debs?

Re: Network VPC Site-to-site VPN issue

2012-07-20 Thread Alena Prokharchyk
S2S VPN code shouldn't have been pushed to master branch, as it's a part of VPC feature. Jessica/Brian, all vpc related code should be a part of 2 branches: * asf/vpc * cloudstack internal 3.0.x branch. Please revert all VPC related changes from master. Only once VPC branch is well tested, we

Re: provenance of source under patches/systemvm/debian

2012-07-20 Thread Chiradeep Vittal
This may be safe to nuke. We don't actually run the xe-tools since it complicates the hypervisor upgrade. Anthony can comment more on this. On 7/20/12 12:11 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din nour.moham...@gmail.com wrote: If no one can remember, can we use the dates and look up thr code in Xen related

Re: [DISCUSS] Binaries (jars) in our source tree/source releases.

2012-07-20 Thread David Nalley
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Robert Schweikert rjsch...@suse.com wrote: On 07/20/2012 03:13 PM, David Nalley wrote: In one of the OSCON discussions, I noted the recent polite discussion re binary jars in source releases on general@incubator. While this is apparently tolerated (if you

RE: [DISCUSS] SystemVMs

2012-07-20 Thread Frank Zhang
Question about license. What's license for system vm itself as it's actually a linux distribution? -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 1:56 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [DISCUSS] SystemVMs So the final

RE: Network VPC Site-to-site VPN issue

2012-07-20 Thread Brian Federle
I just removed the VPC UI from master: commit 152b17b7f399acc0667845a137f3a4610292f774 Author: Brian Federle brian.fede...@citrix.com Date: Fri Jul 20 14:05:44 2012 -0700 Remove dummy VPC UI from networks section -Original Message- From: Alena Prokharchyk Sent: Friday, July 20,

RE: [DISCUSS] Binaries (jars) in our source tree/source releases.

2012-07-20 Thread Alex Huang
- Lets get rid of the jars - spell out everything needed in the doc - make sure that all these dependencies can be built by distros +1. In fact, it should spelled out specifically in the build.xml file for each project. Today the build.xml files just take everything in the deps

Re: [DISCUSS] SystemVMs

2012-07-20 Thread Daniel Mezentsev
Is this thread logically connected to my question about to move SystemVM to independent from CS infrastructure ? Question about license. What's license for system vm itself as it's actually a linux distribution? -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: Friday,

Re: system VM out of CloudStack

2012-07-20 Thread Daniel Mezentsev
Hi Edison, missed your email. That could be ultimate goal, and it's totally reflects unix way - don't use one huge universal tool, rather - set of small, but dedicated to particular task tools. As for now i see that CS is big monolithic complex, with tons internal, non-exposed dependencies.

Re: daemonize - shall we purge?

2012-07-20 Thread Wido den Hollander
On 20-07-12 20:35, Edison Su wrote: The cloud-agent init script still depends on it. Wido is working on to get rid of it? Yes, I'm working on that. I'll make a commit later this week where cloud-agent and cloud-usage no longer depend on it and I'll purge daemonize in that commit. Wido

Re: [DISCUSS] Binaries (jars) in our source tree/source releases.

2012-07-20 Thread Wido den Hollander
On 20-07-12 23:21, Alex Huang wrote: - Lets get rid of the jars - spell out everything needed in the doc - make sure that all these dependencies can be built by distros +1 +1. In fact, it should spelled out specifically in the build.xml file for each project. Today the build.xml

RE: Support for Citrix StorageLink in Cloudstack

2012-07-20 Thread Anthony Xu
Hi Lucas, Great work, Basically, that is a VDI-per-LUN SR. You are right , only copy_vhd_to_secondarystorage.sh and copy_vhd_from_secondarystorage.sh need to handle new type of SR. The reason we use these script to do copy VDI is that VDI-COPY is slow, It will plug two VDIs into dom0 and do

Building and deploying Cloud Agent from source

2012-07-20 Thread Gautam Sampathkumar
Hi all, Could someone let me know the steps to build Cloudstack agent from source and deploy. Unable to really find any documentation on this. thanks in advance. --Gautam

RE: Update on wrapping DevCloud into a Vagrant Box

2012-07-20 Thread Edison Su
-Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 8:17 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Update on wrapping DevCloud into a Vagrant Box On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote:

Re: Building and deploying Cloud Agent from source

2012-07-20 Thread Gautam Sampathkumar
Thanks for your answer Edison. I was able to fix the issues with the missing JAR files and run the Agent. However I get a missing guid problem and it stops. This is on a machine that was running a release version of the cloud-agent previously. Not sure if that has any bearing on this problem.