---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6059/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Prachi Damle.
Description
---
The
HI,
I've just set up CS environment using DevCloud. When I was making some UI
tests, I've noticed that if go to Network/Select VPC/Click Edit for VPC1(or
any)/Click on Site-to-site VPN from Config drop-down/, I get an error and
an empty section. Look at the attached screenshot.
Does any body
Hi Olga ,
The screenshot doesn't get attached when you send a mail to these aliases. You
might want to upload it somewhere and provide the link for it.
Anyways , I tried to reproduce what you mentioned but I did not happen to
encounter such an error and I did not come across any empty fields.
Hi Pranav,
Could you please take a look at screenshots below:
http://prntscr.com/ce913
http://prntscr.com/ce921
http://prntscr.com/ce933
Thanks,
Olga
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Pranav Saxena pranav.sax...@citrix.comwrote:
Hi Olga ,
** **
The screenshot doesn’t get attached when
We can have a Backup And Recovery Solution for the VM's. That feature will
actually use the Snapshot mechanisms to provide the backup and restore. The
other option is to take the clone of the entire VM at different stages and
preserve it in backup store. But to clone the VM it should be stopped
Hello,
We are using CloudStack in an environment with Citrix Xen (Enterprise
Edition) and Dell EqualLogic SANs.
We are trying to take advantage of Citrix Storage Link features, especially
the feature that allows to have a thin provisioned volume/LUN on the SAN per
Vitrual Machine, rather
I have found success with using a combo of templates/snapshots and BackupPC on
the guests.
This way in a worse case scenario I can roll out a template or even ISO install
and re-image the guest from BackupPC is snapshots fail or the original VM
corrupts.
In-fact having at least one backup
Also for all UI related bugs, we have to attach Api request/response (in
Firefox you can catch it with Firebug; there should be similar plugin for
Chrome).
-Alena.
On 7/20/12 4:06 AM, Olga Smola olya.sm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Pranav,
Could you please take a look at screenshots below:
Copy_vhd_from_secondary:
1. take three parameters:
the url of template: e.g.
nfs://your-secondary-storage/path/templatename.vhd,
dest primary storage sr uuid
name label of the to be created VHD
2. mount secondary storage
3. create a vhd file on primary storage
4. if the dest
Edison,
A couple of questions for you:
1 - It looks like you are using password-based authentication for the
scp command (changed in lib/vagrant/ssh.rb ). Am I reading that
change correctly? I think we can get away with using the vagrant
user and standard vagrant public / private keys
Hi folks, I keep hearing that daemonize isn't used at all anymore, yet
it continues to live on - shall we purge it?
--David
The cloud-agent init script still depends on it. Wido is working on to get rid
of it?
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 11:07 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: daemonize - shall we purge?
Hi folks, I keep
Sent from my Samdung Galaxy S3
Apologies for any typos
On Jul 20, 2012 8:40 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
Hi folks
I wanted to report back on some conversations that Kevin Kluge and I
participated in at OSCON. We went to lunch with Justin Erenkrantz, Jim
Jagielski, and Ross Gardler.
In one of the OSCON discussions, I noted the recent polite discussion
re binary jars in source releases on general@incubator. While this is
apparently tolerated (if you don't mind wearing Nomex), it's
considered a Bad Thing (TM) generally speaking. Folks suggested that
we look at how subversion
On 7/20/12 11:04 AM, Frank Zhang frank.zh...@citrix.com wrote:
I think we can, for it's built with CloudStack now
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 10:55 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: cloudbridge rpms/debs?
S2S VPN code shouldn't have been pushed to master branch, as it's a part
of VPC feature.
Jessica/Brian, all vpc related code should be a part of 2 branches:
* asf/vpc
* cloudstack internal 3.0.x branch.
Please revert all VPC related changes from master. Only once VPC branch is
well tested, we
This may be safe to nuke. We don't actually run the xe-tools since it
complicates the hypervisor upgrade. Anthony can comment more on this.
On 7/20/12 12:11 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din nour.moham...@gmail.com
wrote:
If no one can remember, can we use the dates and look up thr code in Xen
related
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Robert Schweikert rjsch...@suse.com wrote:
On 07/20/2012 03:13 PM, David Nalley wrote:
In one of the OSCON discussions, I noted the recent polite discussion
re binary jars in source releases on general@incubator. While this is
apparently tolerated (if you
Question about license.
What's license for system vm itself as it's actually a linux distribution?
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 1:56 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] SystemVMs
So the final
I just removed the VPC UI from master:
commit 152b17b7f399acc0667845a137f3a4610292f774
Author: Brian Federle brian.fede...@citrix.com
Date: Fri Jul 20 14:05:44 2012 -0700
Remove dummy VPC UI from networks section
-Original Message-
From: Alena Prokharchyk
Sent: Friday, July 20,
- Lets get rid of the jars
- spell out everything needed in the doc
- make sure that all these dependencies can be built by distros
+1. In fact, it should spelled out specifically in the build.xml file for each
project. Today the build.xml files just take everything in the deps
Is this thread logically connected to my question about to move SystemVM
to independent from CS infrastructure ?
Question about license.
What's license for system vm itself as it's actually a linux distribution?
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: Friday,
Hi Edison,
missed your email. That could be ultimate goal, and it's totally
reflects unix way - don't use one huge universal tool, rather - set of
small, but dedicated to particular task tools. As for now i see that CS
is big monolithic complex, with tons internal, non-exposed dependencies.
On 20-07-12 20:35, Edison Su wrote:
The cloud-agent init script still depends on it. Wido is working on to get rid
of it?
Yes, I'm working on that.
I'll make a commit later this week where cloud-agent and cloud-usage no
longer depend on it and I'll purge daemonize in that commit.
Wido
On 20-07-12 23:21, Alex Huang wrote:
- Lets get rid of the jars
- spell out everything needed in the doc
- make sure that all these dependencies can be built by distros
+1
+1. In fact, it should spelled out specifically in the build.xml file for each
project. Today the build.xml
Hi Lucas,
Great work,
Basically, that is a VDI-per-LUN SR.
You are right , only copy_vhd_to_secondarystorage.sh and
copy_vhd_from_secondarystorage.sh need to handle new type of SR.
The reason we use these script to do copy VDI is that VDI-COPY is slow,
It will plug two VDIs into dom0 and do
Hi all,
Could someone let me know the steps to build Cloudstack agent from
source and deploy. Unable to really find any documentation on this.
thanks in advance.
--Gautam
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 8:17 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Update on wrapping DevCloud into a Vagrant Box
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote:
Thanks for your answer Edison. I was able to fix the issues with the
missing JAR files and run the Agent. However I get a missing guid problem
and it stops. This is on a machine that was running a release version of
the cloud-agent previously. Not sure if that has any bearing on this
problem.
29 matches
Mail list logo