RE: [VOTE] Accept a donation of "Documentation for various features" from Citrix

+1 -Original Message- From: Jessica Tomechak [mailto:jessica.tomec...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 12:15 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of "Documentation for various features" from Citrix -Original Message- > From:

RE: [VOTE] Accept a donation of 'network service support in shared network' from Citrix.

+1 -Original Message- From: Kishan Kavala [mailto:kishan.kav...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 12:41 PM To: CloudStack DeveloperList Subject: RE: [VOTE] Accept a donation of 'network service support in shared network' from Citrix. +1 (binding) > -Original Message- >

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-938) s2s VPN trouble

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13557027#comment-13557027 ] Richard Shevel commented on CLOUDSTACK-938: --- I also saw 2013-01-18 11:40:49

[jira] [Comment Edited] (CLOUDSTACK-938) s2s VPN trouble

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13557024#comment-13557024 ] Richard Shevel edited comment on CLOUDSTACK-938 at 1/18/13 7:43 AM:

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-938) s2s VPN trouble

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13557024#comment-13557024 ] Richard Shevel commented on CLOUDSTACK-938: --- completed the installation of

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-1010) Host count and Secondary storage count always shows 1 in UI

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sudha Ponnaganti updated CLOUDSTACK-1010: - Assignee: Kishan Kavala (was: Sonny Chhen) > Host count and Secondary s

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1011) KVM host getting disconnected in cluster environment

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13557020#comment-13557020 ] Sudha Ponnaganti commented on CLOUDSTACK-1011: -- Yes testing against netw

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-938) s2s VPN trouble

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13557019#comment-13557019 ] Richard Shevel commented on CLOUDSTACK-938: --- [root@bh4 agent]# /bin/bash -c

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-1003) Failed to start management server with master build

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sudha Ponnaganti updated CLOUDSTACK-1003: - Priority: Blocker (was: Major) > Failed to start management server with

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1011) KVM host getting disconnected in cluster environment

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13557013#comment-13557013 ] Marcus Sorensen commented on CLOUDSTACK-1011: - Try with commit 55e8965bd0

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1011) KVM host getting disconnected in cluster environment

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13557010#comment-13557010 ] Sudha Ponnaganti commented on CLOUDSTACK-1011: -- Marcus we need a fix f

RE: [VOTE] Accept a donation of 'network service support in shared network' from Citrix.

+1 (binding) > -Original Message- > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, 18 January 2013 7:28 AM > To: CloudStack DeveloperList > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of 'network service support in shared > network' from Citrix. > > +1 (binding) >

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1011) KVM host getting disconnected in cluster environment

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13557007#comment-13557007 ] Marcus Sorensen commented on CLOUDSTACK-1011: - I've got a fix for this, j

Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of "Documentation for various features" from Citrix

-Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 1:51 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of "Documentation for various > features" from Citrix > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:48 P

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-1011) KVM host getting disconnected in cluster environment

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rayees Namathponnan updated CLOUDSTACK-1011: Attachment: Agent_Log.rar Agent log attached > KVM h

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-1011) KVM host getting disconnected in cluster environment

Rayees Namathponnan created CLOUDSTACK-1011: --- Summary: KVM host getting disconnected in cluster environment Key: CLOUDSTACK-1011 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1011 Pr

RE: Putting awsapi in a profile

Heads up use awsapi profile to build it alongwith rest of the cloudstack modules. Applied on master, updated cwiki; https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/How+to+build+on+master+branch Annotation updates; https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Annotations+use+in+t

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-713) Limit Resources to domain/accounts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-713?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13556987#comment-13556987 ] Sanjay Tripathi commented on CLOUDSTACK-713: 50% completed.

RE: Putting awsapi in a profile

+1 Regards, Sateesh > -Original Message- > From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com] > Sent: 18 January 2013 11:15 > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: Putting awsapi in a profile > > +1 > > -Original Message- > From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu.

Setting Up CloudStack Dev Environment on Windows

Hi, I followed the instructions on setting up the Cloud Stack Dev Environment on Windows. I was able to install all the needed tools/packages, build the source code successfully. However, while trying to start the Management Server on the local Jetty Server from cygwin window, I am getting the

Re: [WIKI] Better title for CI page on the wiki

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 04:41:32AM +0530, Alex Huang wrote: > I propose that we add WIKI tag for anything regarding work on the WIKI pages. > > Prasanna, > > You added a page with the title of CI. Can you give it a better > title so people understand what this is by reading the title? > Done -

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-1010) Host count and Secondary storage count always shows 1 in UI

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sudha Ponnaganti updated CLOUDSTACK-1010: - Assignee: Sonny Chhen > Host count and Secondary storage count always sh

[jira] [Closed] (CLOUDSTACK-1002) Not able to start VM.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sangeetha Hariharan closed CLOUDSTACK-1002. --- Resolution: Fixed With this latest build from "network-refactor" branch,

Re: [MERGE] network refactoring, phase 1

Nonoss build is broken in master branch, not sure if it is related to this merge? [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) on project cloud-plugin-network-f5: Compilation failure [ERROR] /Users/minc/dev/cloud-asf/plugins/network

RE: Putting awsapi in a profile

+1 -Original Message- From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 11:12 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: Putting awsapi in a profile +1 > -Original Message- > From: Min Chen [mailto:min.c...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday,

RE: Putting awsapi in a profile

+1 > -Original Message- > From: Min Chen [mailto:min.c...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 9:23 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Putting awsapi in a profile > > +1 on this. > -min > > On 1/17/13 8:31 PM, "prasanna" wrote: > > >I'd prefer that to

Re: [MERGE] Merge branch api_limit

On 18 January 2013 10:50, Min Chen wrote: > This integration test just runs API server responding concurrent api > calls, but it assumes that there is a "demo" account (not root admin) in > the system to test this feature. I just coded this test to save my manual > testing efforts:) > > Thanks > -

RE: [DISCUSS] Integrate Cisco ASA 1000v into CloudStack

Manan, Can you answer the questions that Chiradeep has raised? Chiradeep, I saw that you have started working on asa/vnmc here (https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-cloudstack/repo?p=incubator-cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/cisco-vnmc-api-integration). I would like to underst

Re: Putting awsapi in a profile

+1 on this. -min On 1/17/13 8:31 PM, "prasanna" wrote: >I'd prefer that too. > >On 18 January 2013 08:19, Rohit Yadav wrote: >> "awsapi" is not really part of cloudstack and should not consume our >>time to be built every time we build cloudstack, so I've put it inside a >>build profile in jav

Re: [Discuss] SNMP Alerts support in CloudStack

My implementation of log4j appender will require changes in log4j-cloud.xml file and addition/modification of some LOG statements in CloudStack. Which I suppose is not making it tightly coupled with CloudStack. Thanks, Anshul On 17/01/13 23:38, Ram Ganesh wrote: > Anshul, > > If you implement yo

Re: [MERGE] Merge branch api_limit

This integration test just runs API server responding concurrent api calls, but it assumes that there is a "demo" account (not root admin) in the system to test this feature. I just coded this test to save my manual testing efforts:) Thanks -min On 1/17/13 9:15 PM, "prasanna" wrote: >On 18 Janu

Re: JVM level cluster deployments

Thanks for the feedback. so how does CloudStack provide HA/failover guarantees? (not just the apache CloudStack but also the Citrix enterprise CloudPlatform and cloudPortal/CPBM)? A service provider using CloudStack would expect nothing breaks from two angle: user's perspective and back-end provis

Re: [MERGE] Merge branch api_limit

On 18 January 2013 10:23, Min Chen wrote: > Hi Sudha, > > The unit tests will be automatically included in "mvn clean install" run > after my merge. Integration test will not be enabled automatically since it > relies on a running MS. > > Thanks > - min > > One can set it to run a

Re: [Discuss] SNMP Alerts support in CloudStack

There are two ways of adding them. 1. add them as separate loggers in log4j.xml file 2. some modifications in library First one is xml driven so cannot take care of runtime addition and deletion of SNMP Manager In case of second one, effort required will be more than adding our own implement

Re: [MERGE] Merge branch api_limit

Hi Sudha, The unit tests will be automatically included in "mvn clean install" run after my merge. Integration test will not be enabled automatically since it relies on a running MS. Thanks - min Sent from my iPhone On Jan 17, 2013, at 6:47 PM, "Sudha Ponnaganti" wrote: > M

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1002) Not able to start VM.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13556961#comment-13556961 ] Sudha Ponnaganti commented on CLOUDSTACK-1002: -- edison, this is kind of

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-1002) Not able to start VM.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sudha Ponnaganti updated CLOUDSTACK-1002: - Assignee: edison su > Not able to start VM. > - > >

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-1002) Not able to start VM.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sudha Ponnaganti updated CLOUDSTACK-1002: - Priority: Blocker (was: Major) > Not able to start VM. > --

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-706) Persistent Networks without running a VM

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13556960#comment-13556960 ] Likitha Shetty commented on CLOUDSTACK-706: --- Progress - 50% done. The code

Re: Putting awsapi in a profile

I'd prefer that too. On 18 January 2013 08:19, Rohit Yadav wrote: > "awsapi" is not really part of cloudstack and should not consume our time to > be built every time we build cloudstack, so I've put it inside a build > profile in javelin only. If one wants then only it would be built; mvn > i

Re: [VOTE} Accept a donaiton of "support security group enabled network in advanced zone" from Citrix

+1 (binding) On 18/01/13 3:32 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi > wrote: >> Reposting with subject line VOTE >> >> Committers have binding votes for this decision. >> >> Please respond with your vote: >> +1 - Accept the donation and begin the proces

Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of 'providing support of optional Public IP assignment for EIP with Basic Zone' from Citrix.

+1 (binding) On 18/01/13 2:34 AM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote: >+1 (binding) > >From: Animesh Chaturvedi [animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] >Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 11:04 PM >To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >Subject: RE: [VOTE] Accept a donation of '

RE: [VOTE] Accept a donation of Egress firewall rules feature for guest network for CloudStack from Citrix

+1 Regards, Sateesh > -Original Message- > From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com] > Sent: 18 January 2013 09:11 > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Accept a donation of Egress firewall rules feature for > guest network for CloudStack from Citr

RE: [VOTE] Accept a donation of Egress firewall rules feature for guest network for CloudStack from Citrix

+1 -Original Message- From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 9:07 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of Egress firewall rules feature for guest network for CloudStack from Citrix +1 (bi

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-1002) Not able to start VM.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rayees Namathponnan updated CLOUDSTACK-1002: Attachment: Agent_Log.rar facing same issue with KVM agent, agent neve

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1002) Not able to start VM.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13556936#comment-13556936 ] Rayees Namathponnan commented on CLOUDSTACK-1002: - I am facing same i

Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of Egress firewall rules feature for guest network for CloudStack from Citrix

+1 (binding) On 18/01/13 8:41 AM, "Chiradeep Vittal" wrote: >+1 (binding) > >On 1/17/13 8:30 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: > >>On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> >>> I'd like to start the process of IP Clearance for >>>CLOUDSTACK-299

[jira] [Closed] (CLOUDSTACK-995) Not able to add the KVM host.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-995?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sudha Ponnaganti closed CLOUDSTACK-995. --- fixed and verified > Not able to add the KVM host. > ---

Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of Egress firewall rules feature for guest network for CloudStack from Citrix

+1 (binding) On 1/17/13 8:30 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I'd like to start the process of IP Clearance for >>CLOUDSTACK-299//issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDS

Re: Build SystemVM template

On 17-Jan-2013, at 6:58 PM, Edison Su wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@citrix.com] >> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 6:47 PM >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Build SystemVM template >> >> >> On 17-Jan-2013, at 6:10

Re: [DISCUSS] PaaS Enablement: Composite Application Blueprints (#576)

I tend to agree that what you can do with vApps (OVF) you can do with CF, and more. The issue with vApps I had was that stuff like network rules (FW/LB/etc) were not captured. They can be extensions, but everyone's extension is different. Hence I found the vaunted portability (to choose a different

Re: [DISCUSS] IPv6 support draft functional spec(phase 1)

The spec calls for dualstack, so ipv4 would still work? On 1/17/13 3:49 PM, "Sheng Yang" wrote: >On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Alex Huang wrote: >>> We just want to make thing as simple as possible for the phase 1. The >>> service other than DNS/DHCP would be supported later, and depends on

RE: Build SystemVM template

> -Original Message- > From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 6:47 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Build SystemVM template > > > On 17-Jan-2013, at 6:10 PM, Sheng Yang wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:07 P

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1010) Host count and Secondary storage count always shows 1 in UI

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13556922#comment-13556922 ] Rayees Namathponnan commented on CLOUDSTACK-1010: - API called with pa

Putting awsapi in a profile

"awsapi" is not really part of cloudstack and should not consume our time to be built every time we build cloudstack, so I've put it inside a build profile in javelin only. If one wants then only it would be built; mvn install -P awsapi We can do the same for master? Regards.

RE: [MERGE] Merge branch api_limit

Min, Would these unit tests be automatically included in our Junit suite for next run?? Thanks /sudha -Original Message- From: Min Chen [mailto:min.c...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 4:10 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [MERGE] Merge branch api_limit

Re: Build SystemVM template

On 17-Jan-2013, at 6:10 PM, Sheng Yang wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: >> Hi Sheng, we can reuse viewee and vagrant based appliance building code for >> devcloud for systemvm. We can use debian wheezy i386 beta4 for now and when >> it releases in february we can h

Re: [MERGE] Merge branch api_limit

+1 It's plugin so wont' affect the core. Regards. On 17-Jan-2013, at 4:09 PM, Min Chen wrote: > Hey all, > > I would like to merge my feature branch api_limit with master. This branch > deals with JIRA tickets CLOUDSTACK-618. Basically it implemented a plugin to > provide basic support for ap

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-1010) Host count and Secondary storage count always shows 1 in UI

Rayees Namathponnan created CLOUDSTACK-1010: --- Summary: Host count and Secondary storage count always shows 1 in UI Key: CLOUDSTACK-1010 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1010

Re: Build SystemVM template

That's OK. Use vhd-util or qemu-img convert On 1/17/13 6:17 PM, "Edison Su" wrote: >Veewee doesn't support to create xen pv vm: >https://github.com/jedi4ever/veewee > >> -Original Message- >> From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] >> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013

RE: Build SystemVM template

Veewee doesn't support to create xen pv vm: https://github.com/jedi4ever/veewee > -Original Message- > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 6:14 PM > To: CloudStack DeveloperList > Subject: Re: Build SystemVM template > > +1 for ve

Re: Build SystemVM template

+1 for veewee. I do have a version of buildsystemvm.sh that successfully built a Wheezy systemvm. But I didn't actually run the resulting vm. FWIW, the current systemvm was born before Debian Squeeze was released. On 1/17/13 6:10 PM, "Sheng Yang" wrote: >On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Rohit Y

Re: Build SystemVM template

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Sheng Yang wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Chiradeep Vittal > wrote: >> I'd say that we need to upgrade to Debian Wheezy anyway which contains the >> fix. > > Wheezy haven't been released. It have been just freezed. I think it's > not ready for the new s

[jira] [Closed] (CLOUDSTACK-1009) installationWizard failed, Cannot read property '$formContainer' of undefined

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Isaac Chiang closed CLOUDSTACK-1009. Resolution: Not A Problem > installationWizard failed, Cannot read property '$form

Re: Build SystemVM template

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi Sheng, we can reuse viewee and vagrant based appliance building code for > devcloud for systemvm. We can use debian wheezy i386 beta4 for now and when > it releases in february we can have another round of building/testing. Sure, is there

Re: Build SystemVM template

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > I'd say that we need to upgrade to Debian Wheezy anyway which contains the > fix. Wheezy haven't been released. It have been just freezed. I think it's not ready for the new systemvm template yet. --Sheng > > On 1/17/13 4:18 PM, "Sheng Y

RE: [DISCUSS] Enabling storage xenmotion on xenserver 6.1

I will double check, maybe things have changed in newer versions, but last I checked the copy storage qemu option doesn't support the fancy stuff like backing images, so no need to create the template for root. I will follow up on that though. One other caveat I think. Source format probably has t

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-1007) Not able to delete Shared network.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sangeetha Hariharan updated CLOUDSTACK-1007: Description: Steps to reproduce the problem: Set up - Advanced zone

Re: Build SystemVM template

I'd say that we need to upgrade to Debian Wheezy anyway which contains the fix. On 1/17/13 4:18 PM, "Sheng Yang" wrote: >Hi, > >I just found the buildsystemvm.sh won't work, and I need to build a >new systemvm template for IPv6 support, because we're adding new >softwares in it. > >Apparently du

Re: [MERGE] Merge branch api_limit

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Min Chen wrote: > Hey all, > > I would like to merge my feature branch api_limit with master. This branch > deals with JIRA tickets CLOUDSTACK-618. Basically it implemented a plugin to > provide basic support for api rate limiting to avoid malicious attack on >

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-1009) installationWizard failed, Cannot read property '$formContainer' of undefined

Isaac Chiang created CLOUDSTACK-1009: Summary: installationWizard failed, Cannot read property '$formContainer' of undefined Key: CLOUDSTACK-1009 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1009

Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of 'network service support in shared network' from Citrix.

+1 (binding) On 1/17/13 9:35 AM, "Animesh Chaturvedi" wrote: >+1 > >> -Original Message- >> From: Kelceydamage@bbits [mailto:kel...@bbits.ca] >> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 9:09 AM >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of 'network servic

Re: JVM level cluster deployments

As far as I know no one deploys in this manner. On 1/17/13 6:30 AM, "Adnan Ashraf" wrote: >Hi, > >I would appreciate if anyone can provide feedback on following questions: > >Roughly what is the number of cloudStack deployments that are in JVM >(tomcat or other server) cluster mode where all ses

RE: [DISCUSS] Enabling storage xenmotion on xenserver 6.1

Devdeep, You mentioned one limitation of xenmotion is it only allows one snapshot. In your below test, can you create a root-disk snapshot from CS UI before do xenmetion, see if it works? Thanks, Anthony > -Original Message- > From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thur

Re: [DISCUSS] refactoring the marvin integration library

+1. Sounds more like a new feature than a 'refactor'. What I'd like is a DSL-kind of experience (which is what cloudmonkey is tending to) Then we could use Lettuce or Cucumber to write some tests. On 1/17/13 1:01 AM, "Prasanna Santhanam" wrote: >Marvin is a great tool for simplifying test case w

RE: [DISCUSS] Enabling storage xenmotion on xenserver 6.1

Do you have document about how xenmotion works? I looked at http://blogs.citrix.com/2012/08/24/storage_xenmotion/ and http://www.citrix.com/wsdm/restServe/skb/attachments/RDY8035/LiveStorageMigrationwithXenServer.pdf, still not quite sure, what happened underneath. For example, what the migratio

RE: [DISCUSS] Enabling storage xenmotion on xenserver 6.1

> -Original Message- > From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 4:35 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Enabling storage xenmotion on xenserver 6.1 > > The main blocker for KVM is that you can't start the vm

RE: [DISCUSS] UI automation using Python/Selenium

Better to use headless mode and without X if possible, easier to deploy automate test environment for CI. > -Original Message- > From: Parth Jagirdar [mailto:parth.jagir...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 2:15 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: [DIS

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-1008) "Egress" tab should not be presented in the UI for Shared Networks

Sangeetha Hariharan created CLOUDSTACK-1008: --- Summary: "Egress" tab should not be presented in the UI for Shared Networks Key: CLOUDSTACK-1008 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1008

Re: [DISCUSS] Security Groups Isolation in Advanced Zone

I don't think that's what Anthony is saying. I think he is saying that if a VM is in security groups X,Y,Z, then ALL nics of the VM are in security groups X,Y,Z. The AWS-compatible way is that nics are associated with the security group. So, VM's eth0 can be in security group Z and eth1 can be in

RE: [DISCUSS] Enabling storage xenmotion on xenserver 6.1

> -Original Message- > From: Devdeep Singh [mailto:devdeep.si...@citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 2:44 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Enabling storage xenmotion on xenserver 6.1 > > Hi Anthony, > > I tried storage xenmotion for two V

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-1007) Not able to delete Shared network.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chandan Purushothama updated CLOUDSTACK-1007: - Attachment: management-server.zip > Not able to delete Shared ne

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-938) s2s VPN trouble

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13556860#comment-13556860 ] Marcus Sorensen commented on CLOUDSTACK-938: Richard, if you are willing,

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-1007) Not able to delete Shared network.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sangeetha Hariharan updated CLOUDSTACK-1007: Attachment: agent.log > Not able to delete Shared network. > -

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-1007) Not able to delete Shared network.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sangeetha Hariharan updated CLOUDSTACK-1007: Attachment: agent.log.2013-01-17.gz > Not able to delete Shared ne

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-810: Make DirectAgent thread pool size configurable

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8855/#review15478 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Chiradeep Vittal On Jan. 15, 2013, 7:09 a.m.,

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1007) Not able to delete Shared network.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13556852#comment-13556852 ] Sangeetha Hariharan commented on CLOUDSTACK-1007: - Account deletion i

Re: [MERGE] network refactoring, phase 1

Merge done. Tool issue. On 1/16/13 11:21 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal" wrote: >Having problems with the merge. ETA is Thursday evening PST. > >On 1/16/13 3:40 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal" >wrote: > >>OK , will re-do the merge and re-test and commit by EOD >> >>On 1/16/13 1:56 PM, "Animesh Chaturvedi" >>wro

Re: Build SystemVM template

Hi Sheng, we can reuse viewee and vagrant based appliance building code for devcloud for systemvm. We can use debian wheezy i386 beta4 for now and when it releases in february we can have another round of building/testing. Regards. On 17-Jan-2013, at 4:18 PM, Sheng Yang wrote: > Hi, > > I ju

RE: [DISCUSS] PaaS Enablement: Composite Application Blueprints (#576)

I don't think this is off-topic at all. The flip side of ingesting a blueprint is how to create it. Exporting a project is very interesting idea. --Alex > -Original Message- > From: Kelcey Damage (BT) [mailto:kel...@backbonetechnology.com] On > Behalf Of kdam...@apache.org > Sent: Thur

RE: Edit Access to Jira

Never mind Got it... :-) Thanks, .. Parth -Original Message- From: Parth Jagirdar [mailto:parth.jagir...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 4:31 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: Edit Access to Jira Alex, There seems to be something wrong. I still do

RE: Edit Access to Jira

Your email from citrix is listed in the roles. Maybe you need to logout and back in? --Alex > -Original Message- > From: Parth Jagirdar [mailto:parth.jagir...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 4:31 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: Edit Access to J

RE: Edit Access to Jira

Alex, There seems to be something wrong. I still do not see assignee option. Thanks, .. Parth -Original Message- From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 4:03 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: Edit Access to Jira I did bu

Build SystemVM template

Hi, I just found the buildsystemvm.sh won't work, and I need to build a new systemvm template for IPv6 support, because we're adding new softwares in it. Apparently due to license issue(I guess),xt_CHECKSUM.ko which is a extension of iptables to fix one Debian/Ubuntu DHCP issue. I believe the ipt

[MERGE] Merge branch api_limit

Hey all, I would like to merge my feature branch api_limit with master. This branch deals with JIRA tickets CLOUDSTACK-618. Basically it implemented a plugin to provide basic support for api rate limiting to avoid malicious attack on CloudStack server. Implementation details can be found in thi

RE: Edit Access to Jira

I did but the email appears to be from live.com? --Alex > -Original Message- > From: Demetrius Tsitrelis [mailto:demetrius.tsitre...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 3:12 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Edit Access to Jira > > Would you give me e

[jira] [Comment Edited] (CLOUDSTACK-938) s2s VPN trouble

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13556702#comment-13556702 ] Marcus Sorensen edited comment on CLOUDSTACK-938 at 1/18/13 12:01 AM: --

RE: [DISCUSS] Email etiquette CC or not CC

Sorry for the top post here. I want to address the chain as a whole. I think Edison's original email and Chip's reply presents two different set of problems. The first set is mailing list is too verbose. I have heard this time and time again and it's been brought up on the list several times.

[jira] [Comment Edited] (CLOUDSTACK-938) s2s VPN trouble

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13556702#comment-13556702 ] Marcus Sorensen edited comment on CLOUDSTACK-938 at 1/17/13 11:50 PM: --

Re: [DISCUSS] IPv6 support draft functional spec(phase 1)

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Alex Huang wrote: >> We just want to make thing as simple as possible for the phase 1. The >> service other than DNS/DHCP would be supported later, and depends on >> how much time we have. >> > > How do you present something like this to the end user if it works on

  1   2   3   4   >