RE: [MERGE] Support VM Snapshot

Murali, I haven’t tested all possible cases, but due to the fact possible VM state transits are defined by state machine, all operations that results in VM state change are blocked (or fail) when VM in snapshotting or reverting state. For operations that does not cause VM state change, it depen

RE: [DISCUSS] DeployVirtualMachine userdata enhancements

> -Original Message- > From: rohityada...@gmail.com [mailto:rohityada...@gmail.com] On Behalf > Of Rohit Yadav > Sent: 30 January 2013 10:30 > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] DeployVirtualMachine userdata enhancements > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Ni

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1080) Interface heirarchy for AccountManagerImpl superflous

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13566250#comment-13566250 ] Joe San commented on CLOUDSTACK-1080: - I did manage to submit the patch. But I di

RE: Questions related to Regions Feature

Failures are stored in region_sync table in cloud DB. Sample entry: mysql> select * from region_sync\G *** 1. row *** id: 3 region_id: 2 api: command=createUser&username=u6&password=u6&firstname=u6&lastname=u6&email=dsfd%40dsf.com&acco

Re: Apache CloudStack Book (Japanese)

Awesome! Thanks for sharing. Regards. On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Kimihiko Kitase wrote: > Hello > > Japan CloudStack User Group member and more people from CloudStack eco > system vendor (over 24 people) wrote CloudStack Book based on Apache > CloudStack 4.0.0. > http://www.amazon.co.jp/gp

Re: [MERGE] Support VM Snapshot

>>> >>> >>> >>> Potential impact and notes: >>> * 4 new states are added to VM state Machine Mice, When the VM is in transient states (RunningSnapshotting, StoppedSnapshotting), I see that you have taken care of vmsync. But have you ensured that all the concurrent operations on the VM are blocked

RE: [MERGE] Regions branch to master

Chiradeep, Please find my comments inline. > -Original Message- > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, 30 January 2013 1:42 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [MERGE] Regions branch to master > > 0. Doesn't compile (commi

Re: Apache CloudStack Book (Japanese)

Hi Japan! I am new to CS but I am also based in Tokyo if anyone needs help(where i am able) I understand Japanese as well. Maybe the guys under me could uses this new book since they are all Japanese. Thanks for your hard work! Best, Jake G On 2013/01/30, at 15:10, Frans Thamura wrote: > A

Re: Apache CloudStack Book (Japanese)

Awesome We are creating tutorial from install to deploy also. Using bahasa indonesia language. We will inform after all done. Frans Thamura Cloudstack user group indonesia On Jan 30, 2013 12:38 PM, "Kimihiko Kitase" wrote: > Hello > > Japan CloudStack User Group member and more people from Clo

Review Request: A minor refacotoring to the AccountManagerImpl.java to remove the superfluous interface implements

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9152/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Description --- Removed the superfluous inte

Re: Apache CloudStack Book (Japanese)

Thats awesome! And you guys beat me to market on both the CloudStack books I'm working in :). I wish I could read Japanese. Sent from my iPhone On Jan 29, 2013, at 9:38 PM, Kimihiko Kitase wrote: > Hello > > Japan CloudStack User Group member and more people from CloudStack eco > system vend

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1080) Interface heirarchy for AccountManagerImpl superflous

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13566202#comment-13566202 ] Pranav Saxena commented on CLOUDSTACK-1080: --- You got to use the last but on

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1080) Interface heirarchy for AccountManagerImpl superflous

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13566198#comment-13566198 ] Joe San commented on CLOUDSTACK-1080: - I followed the article to create a patch.

Re: [DISCUSS] DeployVirtualMachine userdata enhancements

Mice - I suggest you to open an enhancement for this. Resource tags limitation might be due to the fact that some of the tags in the db table should not exceed size of 255. Thanks, -Nitin On 30/01/13 10:22 AM, "Mice Xia" wrote: >+1 for using right http method for true restful web service in the

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-684) Support VM Snapshot

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-684?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13566191#comment-13566191 ] Mice Xia commented on CLOUDSTACK-684: - VMware/Xenserver support can be merged at a

RE: [MERGE] Support VM Snapshot

I'll keep it open for 24 hours, if there is no objection during 24 hours , I will merge it to master -Mice -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 11:11 AM To: Subject: Re: [MERGE] Support VM Snapshot On Jan 29, 2013,

Apache CloudStack Book (Japanese)

Hello Japan CloudStack User Group member and more people from CloudStack eco system vendor (over 24 people) wrote CloudStack Book based on Apache CloudStack 4.0.0. http://www.amazon.co.jp/gp/product/4798130583/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=247&creative=7399&creativeASIN=4798130583&linkCode=as2&tag=

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-1087) Update the Developer Guide for ASFCS 4.1 Release

Radhika Nair created CLOUDSTACK-1087: Summary: Update the Developer Guide for ASFCS 4.1 Release Key: CLOUDSTACK-1087 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1087 Project: CloudStack

Base Image Updation facility TestPlan

Hi, Base Image Updation facility Test Plan is posted @ https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Base+Image+Updation+facility+TestPlan . Please review the same and send me the comments or any additional cases needed to be added. Thanks and Regards, Kiran Koneti

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-838) [QA] Test dedicated pod, cluster, and host functionality.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kiran Koneti updated CLOUDSTACK-838: Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0) 4.2.0 > [QA] Test dedicated pod,

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-845) [QA] Test non-contiguous VLAN range support

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kiran Koneti updated CLOUDSTACK-845: Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0) 4.2.0 > [QA] Test non-contiguous

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-701) Support non-contiguous VLAN ranges

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bharat Kumar updated CLOUDSTACK-701: Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0) 4.2.0 > Support non-contiguous V

RE: IP Clearance

https://reviews.apache.org/r/8813/ https://reviews.apache.org/r/8180/ -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 10:33 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: IP Clearance Radhika Can you call out

RE: IP Clearance

Radhika Can you call out your patch # > -Original Message- > From: Radhika Puthiyetath [mailto:radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 8:45 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: IP Clearance > > There are documentation patches on the Review

Re: [DISCUSS] DeployVirtualMachine userdata enhancements

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Nitin Mehta wrote: > Good point Rohit, but I suggest making only those API's POST which create > a resource (like deployVm here) and not all of them. > Ideally, we need to be using the right http methods for a true restful web > service. Nice suggestion, while we

RE: [DISCUSS] DeployVirtualMachine userdata enhancements

+1 for using right http method for true restful web service in the future. And by the way, does 'create resource tag(s) API' have the same requirement? Max length of tag value is 255 now. Regards Mice -Original Message- From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday,

RE: IP Clearance

There are documentation patches on the Review Board for respective features. Please consider them once the code is checked in. -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 1:52 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.

Re: [DISCUSS] DeployVirtualMachine userdata enhancements

Good point Rohit, but I suggest making only those API's POST which create a resource (like deployVm here) and not all of them. Ideally, we need to be using the right http methods for a true restful web service. Also about the length part, how then we allow user data to be of size 2kb currently ?

Re: Functional Specification for the multiple IPs per NIC

Jayapal, We should not create multiple APIs for diff outputs, when a param can give you control over output from an existing API. -abhi On 30/01/13 12:58 AM, "Chiradeep Vittal" wrote: > > >On 1/29/13 8:23 AM, "Jayapal Reddy Uradi" >wrote: > >> >>listNicIps/listNicSecondaryIps API lists the

Re: question on post changes based on review comments

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:56 PM, Kanzhe Jiang wrote: > I posted an initial patch for review and made more changes based on review > comments. > Should I create the a fresh patch from master or from the previous patch? > Fresh patch from master - though you should be able to upload that to the sa

Re: [DISCUSS] DeployVirtualMachine userdata enhancements

+1 But if we are sending base64 encoded userdata as part of POST, we can increase the limit even further. -1 If userdata will be sent as part of GET query, based on the rfc [1] and from the widely used ugliest web browser [2] the GET url length should be <= 2000 (we're already exceeding that how w

Re: Review Request: BigSwitch VNS Networking Plugin

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9131/ --- (Updated Jan. 30, 2013, 4:12 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack. Changes

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-684) Support VM Snapshot

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-684?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13566133#comment-13566133 ] Hari Kannan commented on CLOUDSTACK-684: This is great! How about platform s

Re: [DISCUSS] DeployVirtualMachine userdata enhancements

+1 I agree we should increase the size of user data to >=44KB that can hold 32KB of real data that is base64 encoded. -abhi On 30/01/13 9:10 AM, "Hari Kannan" wrote: >Hello All, > >I wish to propose increasing the size of userdata to be passed along with >DeployVirtualMachine API - I have add

question on post changes based on review comments

I posted an initial patch for review and made more changes based on review comments. Should I create the a fresh patch from master or from the previous patch? Thanks, -- Kanzhe Jiang MTS at BigSwitch

Re: Review Request: BigSwitch VNS Networking Plugin

> On Jan. 29, 2013, 10:19 p.m., Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > > api/src/com/cloud/api/ApiConstants.java, line 386 > > > > > > There is no reason to add your constant here. You can add it in your > > own plugin package Mov

[DISCUSS] DeployVirtualMachine userdata enhancements

Hello All, I wish to propose increasing the size of userdata to be passed along with DeployVirtualMachine API - I have added some info here https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/DeployVirtualMachine+userdata+enhancements along with a JIRA ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/b

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-1086) DeployVirtualMachine userdata enhancements

Hari Kannan created CLOUDSTACK-1086: --- Summary: DeployVirtualMachine userdata enhancements Key: CLOUDSTACK-1086 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1086 Project: CloudStack

Re: [MERGE] Support VM Snapshot

On Jan 29, 2013, at 9:20 PM, Mice Xia wrote: > Hi, Chip > > 1) You state that it's based off of 4.0. Do you need to rebase against > master? > [mice] already rebased against master > > 2) Are you using reviewboard as a method for easy review of the changes, but > will be committing to master v

Re: integration tests requiring advanced zone

Thanks and That's good to know! While I set up my infra for the tests, Would you be able to share the summary of the test run that nose prints out? I want to be able to see how the different merges change master when they come in. Would be nice to have a baseline. - Original Message ---

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-684) Support VM Snapshot

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-684?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13566089#comment-13566089 ] Mice Xia commented on CLOUDSTACK-684: - Hari, supported items are marked with a pl

RE: [MERGE] Support VM Snapshot

Hi, Chip 1) You state that it's based off of 4.0. Do you need to rebase against master? [mice] already rebased against master 2) Are you using reviewboard as a method for easy review of the changes, but will be committing to master via a merge in the repo? Or will you pull the patch into mast

RE: Not able to start System Vms on KVM host

I was facing same issue with master build. Then re-created same environment with network-refactor build (HEAD is at 93a89b1 CLOUDSTACK-995: fix failed to detect centos 6.2), system vms are coming up without updating /etc/cloud/agent/agent.properties private.network.device=cloudbr0 was in /

Re: integration tests requiring advanced zone

Anything short of live migration can probably be tested in advanced zone in devcloud. We were able to build some tests against the aforementioned Marvin config. Even live migration can be done if you have two devclouds joined to the same zone. On Jan 28, 2013 11:50 PM, "Prasanna Santhanam" wrote:

RE: Not able to start System Vms on KVM host

I am using the master branch, and I ran into the problem of not being able to add host in KVM environment As well. I'll verify my network setup is all right according to the discussions here. Thanks, -Fang -Original Message- From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: Tu

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1078) Not able to start System Vms on Rhel 6.3 KVM host

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13566076#comment-13566076 ] Marcus Sorensen commented on CLOUDSTACK-1078: - There is an email thread a

Re: [MERGE] baremetal feature to master

Awesome, good work! On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Frank Zhang wrote: > I have merged it in master > >> -Original Message- >> From: Frank Zhang [mailto:frank.zh...@citrix.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 2:55 PM >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: [MERGE] barem

RE: [MERGE] baremetal feature to master

I have merged it in master > -Original Message- > From: Frank Zhang [mailto:frank.zh...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 2:55 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [MERGE] baremetal feature to master > > As https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-77

RE: Not able to start System Vms on KVM host

OK, I will look and see when that changed to cloudbr1 as default. On Jan 29, 2013 6:08 PM, "Sangeetha Hariharan" < sangeetha.hariha...@citrix.com> wrote: > Thanks Marcus. > > When I added private.network.device=cloubr0 in > /etc/cloud/agent/agent.properties and restarted the cloud-agent , I see >

Re: Question about Disk Offerings

Awesome...thanks for the info, Marcus! On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Yes, you can have multiple data disks attached, and those data disks can be > based on different disk offerings. > On Jan 29, 2013 6:36 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" > wrote: > > > Thanks for clarifying that

Re: Question about Disk Offerings

Yes, you can have multiple data disks attached, and those data disks can be based on different disk offerings. On Jan 29, 2013 6:36 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" wrote: > Thanks for clarifying that for me, Marcus! > > I have a quick follow-up question for you. > > As you mentioned and I've seen in practic

Re: Question about Disk Offerings

Thanks for clarifying that for me, Marcus! I have a quick follow-up question for you. As you mentioned and I've seen in practice, you can attach a Data Disk Offering to your VM Instance. I haven't looked in CS, but perhaps you know off the top of your head if you are able to have multiple Data D

RE: Not able to start System Vms on KVM host

Thanks Marcus. When I added private.network.device=cloubr0 in /etc/cloud/agent/agent.properties and restarted the cloud-agent , I see the system Vms being launched successfully. We did not have to do these changes in the past. I don't think we did any of these changes when we tested RHEL 6.3 h

RE: [PROPOSAL][DISCUSS] Create a -marketing list for CloudStack

> -Original Message- > From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net] > Sent: 30 January 2013 05:53 > To: CloudStack Developers > Subject: [PROPOSAL][DISCUSS] Create a -marketing list for CloudStack > > Hey all, > > I was getting ready to send a note to -dev about creating some stock > pre

Re: Question about Disk Offerings

You can apply storage tag to both compute offering and disk offering. Root volumes are created from a template, and are only created when a VM is created. They are put on the storage based on the tag the compute offering has. In other words, when you create a new VM, it looks at the storage tag o

Re: Not able to start System Vms on KVM host

This is because if there is no private.network.device config in your /etc/cloud/agent/agent.properties file, LibvirtComputingResource.java defaults to 'cloudbr1'. I would suggest setting all of your traffic labels to cloudbr0, or setting private.network.device to cloubr0. I'm assuming it was set

[PROPOSAL][DISCUSS] Create a -marketing list for CloudStack

Hey all, I was getting ready to send a note to -dev about creating some stock presentations and materials for anyone to go and promote CloudStack, then I realized that - with more than 4K messages sent to -dev in January alone, maybe it's time to go ahead and create a new -marketing list so that f

Not able to start System Vms on KVM host

Marcus, I tried with the patch you have provided on IPV6 branch. Now I see the the public interface being programed correctly. But there are issues with 'cloudbr1' and system Vms are still not coming up. The same issue is also seen when testing with master branch. [root@Rack3Host4 agent]# brc

Question about Disk Offerings

Hi everyone, I'm continuing to learn some of the basics of CloudStack. :) I was able to create an iSCSI target from an Ubuntu VM of mine and enable a XenServer VM of mine to see it. I went into CloudStack and created a new Primary Storage type based off of that storage (by specifying PreSetup).

Re: Review Request: API commands to add or remove NIC from a VM

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Chiradeep Vittal >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 1/28/13 12:38 PM, "Marcus Sorensen" wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Marcus Sorensen >

Re: Questions related to Regions Feature

I commented in the review as well. When you say that it "can be stored", is it ACTUALLY stored? Who is maintaining this log file and what is the procedure to apply these changes? > > >On 1/25/13 3:29 AM, "Kishan Kavala" wrote: > >>We use API calls to sync data and this is working fine when all th

Re: Review Request: API commands to add or remove NIC from a VM

On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Chiradeep Vittal > wrote: >> >> >> On 1/28/13 12:38 PM, "Marcus Sorensen" wrote: >> >>>On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Marcus Sorensen >>>wrote: On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Chiradeep Vittal >

[MERGE] baremetal feature to master

As https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-774 has passed IP clearance and no objection in 72 hours window. I would merge this feature to master shortly

Re: [VOTE][ACS401] Apache CloudStack 4.0.1-incubating release (Second Round)

+1 tested with devcloud2 (no ec2 tests) On 1/29/13 1:41 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: >> G'Day! >> >> Because I appended an extra -incubating to the version, I'm re-starting >> the vote for the 4.0.1-incubating release. >> >> Instructions for

[DISCUSS] topic branch merge, is there any time window?

I have a generic question regarding merging topic branch to master/javelin. Is there any time window we should stop and wait for concerns/review on the code? The topic branches have been passed 72 hours vote window and have functional spec/bug number ready.

Re: Upload Diff to Review Board fails on 'file not found in the repository'

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Donal Lafferty wrote: > All these responses are correct. For a multi-commit patch, create via > 'post-review' and not the ReviewBoard GUI. > > The problem is with adding a diff file that aggregates a bunch of patches. > In my case, I've ~97 commits. Our old w

Re: Review Request: BigSwitch VNS Networking Plugin

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9131/#review15807 --- api/src/com/cloud/api/ApiConstants.java

Re: [RFC][ACS41] "ipv6" branch

Is every networkguru should own it's IP database? In that case, I'd like to call it "direct_ipv6_address"... I haven't done anything especially for , just add the name to hosts file like we did before. Is there anything else we need to do? --Sheng On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Chiradeep

RE: Upload Diff to Review Board fails on 'file not found in the repository'

All these responses are correct. For a multi-commit patch, create via 'post-review' and not the ReviewBoard GUI. The problem is with adding a diff file that aggregates a bunch of patches. In my case, I've ~97 commits. Our old workflow suggests generating the patch with 'git format-patch -s

[RESULT] [IP Clearance] Enhanced baremetal support for Apache CloudStack

Our 72 hour window has passed. So, I'm calling this IP CLEARANCE complete. --David On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 12:58 AM, David Nalley wrote: > - Donation uploaded to people.a.o [1] > - ICLA from the author (Frank Zhang) has been received by the ASF Secretary. > - IP Clearance form has been submitted

[RESULT] [IP Clearance] Citrix donation of egress firewall manipulation for guest network to Apache CloudStack

Our 72 hour window has passed. So, I'm calling this IP CLEARANCE complete. --David On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 12:43 AM, David Nalley wrote: > Citrix has offered donation of egress firewall manipulation for guest > networks to Apache CloudStack. > > - The code was uploaded to ReviewBoard by the auth

[RESULT] [IP CLEARANCE] Citrix donation of documentation for Apache CloudStack

Our 72 hour window has passed. So, I'm calling this IP CLEARANCE complete. On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 12:30 AM, David Nalley wrote: > Citrix has documentation it wishes to donate to Apache CloudStack > > - The ASF Secretary has recorded an ICLA from the author (Jessica Tomechak). > - The source code

Re: [ACS41] Where to merge features?

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Alex Huang wrote: >> >> I'm suggesting that there is risk, and that we need to agree on a >> mitigation for that risk. I'm not suggesting anything beyond that. >> >> What happens if it takes you longer than a day or two to get Javelin >> and master merged? What d

[Purpose] merging baremetal feature to master

As https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-774 has passed IP clearance and no objection in 72 hours window. I would merge this feature to master shortly

Re: [ACS41] Where to merge features?

> > So, it doesn't make sense that there is the option of dropping javelin if it > couldn't be merged in one or two days. Completely agree - if we've reached agreement on merging javelin, but want to push it close to the deadline to include code from others, it's makes no sense to effectively le

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1078) Not able to start System Vms on Rhel 6.3 KVM host

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13565854#comment-13565854 ] Rayees Namathponnan commented on CLOUDSTACK-1078: - Facing same issue

RE: [ACS41] Where to merge features?

> > I'm suggesting that there is risk, and that we need to agree on a > mitigation for that risk. I'm not suggesting anything beyond that. > > What happens if it takes you longer than a day or two to get Javelin > and master merged? What do we do then? Do you want to delay the > 4.1.0 release

Review Request: Hyper-V 2012 Plugin Phase 1

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9143/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Chip Childers. Description --- To include

Re: IP Clearance

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 4:39 PM, David Nalley wrote: > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Chip Childers > wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Chip Childers >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi >>> wrote: For 3 of the features (Jessica, Jaypal and Frank's).

Re: [VOTE][ACS401] Apache CloudStack 4.0.1-incubating release (Second Round)

On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > G'Day! > > Because I appended an extra -incubating to the version, I'm re-starting > the vote for the 4.0.1-incubating release. > > Instructions for testing and validating the artifacts can be found on > the wiki here: > > https://cwiki.apac

Re: IP Clearance

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Chip Childers > wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi >> wrote: >>> For 3 of the features (Jessica, Jaypal and Frank's). The 72 hour window is >>> over as of Monday night. >> >> It's

Re: [DISCUSS] "Arming" cloudstack supporters in "stack war" bakeoffs....

All the pics in docs/en-US/images are png files. just export visio to png and we will be fine. On Jan 29, 2013, at 9:43 PM, wrote: > Mine are all already Gliffy. And I can help you out iswc if you need it? > > -kd > >> -Original Message- >> From: Clayton Weise [mailto:cwe...@iswest.ne

Re: IP Clearance

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi > wrote: >> For 3 of the features (Jessica, Jaypal and Frank's). The 72 hour window is >> over as of Monday night. > > It's not normal to include weekends in the 72 hour window for any > v

RE: IP Clearance

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 1:28 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: IP Clearance > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi > wrote: > > For 3 of the features (Jessi

Re: IP Clearance

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > For 3 of the features (Jessica, Jaypal and Frank's). The 72 hour window is > over as of Monday night. It's not normal to include weekends in the 72 hour window for any votes really... >> -Original Message- >> From: David Nalle

Re: IP Clearance

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > For 3 of the features (Jessica, Jaypal and Frank's). The 72 hour window is > over as of Monday night. > you are correct - sorry - my time-zone challenged hour counting is at fault - I'll send result emails shortly. --David

Re: new package naming

We already have https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-212 For contributing code to ASF CloudStack, please use org.apache.cloudstack, for example a plugin writer can you their own namespace and packages, but if they contribute it to CloudStack they should use o.a.c. Regards. On Tue, Jan

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-1085) Alert needed when admin deploys VMs on Disabled PODs/Clusters

Manan Shah created CLOUDSTACK-1085: -- Summary: Alert needed when admin deploys VMs on Disabled PODs/Clusters Key: CLOUDSTACK-1085 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1085 Project: Cl

RE: IP Clearance

For 3 of the features (Jessica, Jaypal and Frank's). The 72 hour window is over as of Monday night. > -Original Message- > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 1:12 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: IP Clearance > > On Tue,

Re: IP Clearance

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > David do you have to formally call out the 72 hour time window over without > objection, to checkin the code? > Yes. > Jessica, Jayapal, Frank, heads up, 72 hour time window for your features > under IP Clearance is over and there wa

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-713 Limit Resources to domain/accounts

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9110/#review15804 --- server/src/com/cloud/baremetal/BareMetalVmManagerImpl.java

RE: [DISCUSS] "Arming" cloudstack supporters in "stack war" bakeoffs....

Mine are all already Gliffy. And I can help you out iswc if you need it? -kd >-Original Message- >From: Clayton Weise [mailto:cwe...@iswest.net] >Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 10:39 AM >To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] "Arming" cloudstack supporters in "st

Re: [RFC][ACS41] "ipv6" branch

Although the ipv4 namespace is polluted with the "Public" prefix, I prefer that we do not carry over this convention to ipv6. The network can be a "private" or "public" network. I would just drop the "public" notation. Are you updating the records as well in dnsmasq? On 1/29/13 11:43 AM, "She

Re: [MERGE] Regions branch to master

Also, I don't see any new tests. The response object is supposed to be annotated with the table name. On 1/29/13 12:11 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal" wrote: >0. Doesn't compile (commit d3089ba2a5684) >1. Why does the createRegion API take an integer id? I think I know the >answer, but it could be docume

IP Clearance

David do you have to formally call out the 72 hour time window over without objection, to checkin the code? Jessica, Jayapal, Frank, heads up, 72 hour time window for your features under IP Clearance is over and there was no objection. Please be prepared to check in your code into master. Tha

Re: [ACS41] Where to merge features?

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Alex Huang wrote: >> This adjusts our schedule a little bit, and also assumes that the work >> to re-base javelin against master (yet again) will go smoothly and >> quickly. If the Javelin branch isn't able to get to a stable state >> quickly, we will need to cons

Re: [MERGE] Regions branch to master

0. Doesn't compile (commit d3089ba2a5684) 1. Why does the createRegion API take an integer id? I think I know the answer, but it could be documented in the FS / code 2. Why doesn't the createRegion API check for duplicate region names? 3. I'd argue that end users are more familiar with region names

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-1078) Not able to start System Vms on Rhel 6.3 KVM host

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] haroon abdelrahman reassigned CLOUDSTACK-1078: -- Assignee: edison su (was: Sheng Yang) Edison - sorry - since it i

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-1078) Not able to start System Vms on Rhel 6.3 KVM host

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] haroon abdelrahman reassigned CLOUDSTACK-1078: -- Assignee: Sheng Yang Sheng, Can you pls check this?

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-1078) Not able to start System Vms on Rhel 6.3 KVM host

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] haroon abdelrahman updated CLOUDSTACK-1078: --- Priority: Critical (was: Major) > Not able to start System Vms on R

  1   2   >