Hi Marcus,
With the recent KVM patchdisk changes in master, the old System VM template
doesn't seem to create the /dev/vport0p1 interface correctly, so it doesn't
get information on that port, and doesn't bring up the systemVM interfaces.
I'm guessing this is explained by this commit comment [1]:
;
> > What are the possibilities of making the the midonet-client.jar
> > publicly available?
> >
> > If that is not possible it might be worthwhile to discuss if this
> > plugin should be maintained in a separate repository.
>
> Dave Cahill wrot
his host/port or should this be configurable?
This is configurable - see the "// Load Midonet API server location" section of
the configure() method.
- Dave
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To
s://reviews.apache.org/r/9898/#review17849
---
On March 13, 2013, 9:32 a.m., Dave Cahill wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https:
ted network with two VMs, verified
internal and external connectivity via MidoNet.
Thanks,
Dave Cahill
, spun up Advanced Isolated network with two VMs, verified
internal and external connectivity via MidoNet.
Thanks,
Dave Cahill
ugh API.
> >
> >There are large numbers of the code(both mgmt server and backend
> >scripts) depends on the assumption that VR should have source nat when
> >it's serving as VR for isolate network. I am afraid it would be very
> >hard to remove them for now.
&g
Hi Sheng,
CCing you in case this slipped through first time around in the flood of
cloudstack-dev mail. :)
Joe explains more below, but the core of this is if you look at
VirtualRouterElement.verifyServicesCombination():
if (!services.contains(Service.SourceNat)) {
if (servic
n Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Marcus Sorensen
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mar 6, 2013 8:04 AM, "Wido den Hollander" wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 03/06/2013 09:03 AM, Dave Cahill wrote:
>>>>>
>>>&
Hi Mike,
Assign permissions aren't given by default in JIRA.
You can request them if you need them - requesting here on the list should
work fine I think.
Thanks,
Dave.
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> Huh...I must totally be missing it..
> > Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 3:18 PM
> > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Cc: Anthony Xu
> > Subject: Re: Security Groups in Advanced Zone - Plugin Support
> >
> >
> >
> > On 3/7/13 12:22 AM, "Dave Cahill" wrote:
> &
from
the NicProfile, and just use it as needed.
Thanks again for taking the time to respond, and for the detailed FS.
Dave.
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 4:57 AM, Sheng Yang wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 1:36 AM, Dave Cahill wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> Hi Dave,
> >
> > I'v
outer in
> >advanced-isolated, but will NOT be supportable by other network service
> >providers, is this correct?
> >
> >(3) Any reason you have decided to implement Security Groups differently
> >than the other network services? Particularly with respect to
&g
Hi,
I've been catching up on IPv6 plans by reading the functional specs
and Jira tickets - it's great to have so much material to refer to.
I still have a few questions though, and I'm hoping someone involved
with the feature can enlighten me.
*[Support for Providers other than Virtual Router]*
Moving discussion from Jira ticket to dev list as suggested by Hugo.
Request from Kawai-san:
> There is no place to put plugin jar files for cloudstack agent program
now, while management server program has default @PLUGINJAVADIR@ where
plugin classes will be loaded into server at startup.
> We wi
Hi,
I have a question or two that fit nicely in this thread, so I'll jump in. :)
I'm pretty comfortable with the Advanced Isolated, Basic, and VPC modes,
but a little unsure as to the purpose of Advanced Shared mode. I took a
peek at the docs and articles above, but can't quite see the answer - i
-----
On March 1, 2013, 7:46 a.m., Dave Cahill wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/9604/
>
Hi,
In our MidoNet virtual networking plugin [1], we are planning to override
the PublicNetworkGuru with our own version.
As far as I can see, no one has yet done this, so I'd like to sanity check
our approach.
*[Mechanism]*
Create a MidonetPublicNetworkGuru, which extends the PublicNetworkGuru.
running on a single-node setup, the same machine (acting as host) will
receive the keys and set /root/.ssh/id_rsa.pub.cloud and
/root/.ssh/id_rsa.cloud again, to the same values. Again, I guess this is fine,
but wanted to point out the filename clash.
- Dave Cahill
On March 4, 2013, 7:22
nerated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9604/#review17293
-------
On March 1, 2013, 7:46 a.m., Dave Cahill wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatic
ted e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9604/#review17256
---
On March 1, 2013, 7:46 a.m., Dave Cahill wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-ma
Great stuff, well deserved! :)
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Sanjay Tripathi
wrote:
> Congrats Marcus.
>
> Regards,
> Sanjay
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> > Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 10:58 PM
> > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > S
external connectivity.
Thanks,
Dave Cahill
:49 PM, Dave Cahill wrote:
>This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/9604/
> Review request for cloudstack and Hugo Trippaers.
> By Dave Cahill.
> Description
>
> Feature spec:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/
Hi Anthony,
Adding you in CC in case you missed this message.
We're trying to understand in more detail your plan for Security Groups
support.
Thanks,
Dave.
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Mills, Joseph wrote:
> *Hi Anthony,
>
> Thanks for the quick response. Just to check my understanding:
---
Added unit tests to test all variations of this new configuration (no
configuration, defaults, override some traffic etc).
Built and deployed, spun up Advanced Isolated network with two VMs, verified
internal and external connectivity.
Thanks,
Dave Cahill
Hi,
For what it's worth, I was under the same impression as Rohit - that
administrators would edit components.xml to fit their deployment.
See for example this snippet from "Extending CloudStack Networking" [1]:
> "Generally, it is expected that the cloud administrator will configure
components.
Hi,
> Anybody else (Hugo? Dave Cahill?) want to chime in?
I have noticed some issues with the NetworkManager's treatment of non-Guest
NICs / VMs - see for example thread [1].
Kawai-san - could you provide more info on the type of traffic (Guest
only?) and VMs (Guest only, or System
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1173?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13586801#comment-13586801
]
Dave Cahill commented on CLOUDSTACK-1173:
-
Cool, thanks for the up
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1173?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13586779#comment-13586779
]
Dave Cahill commented on CLOUDSTACK-1173:
-
Switching to Blocker as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1173?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dave Cahill updated CLOUDSTACK-1173:
Priority: Blocker (was: Major)
> ConsoleProxyResource instantiation except
Hi,
Since it appears there is consensus in this thread for at least setting up
Gerrit (if not for mandating a certain number of +1 reviews), what is the
next step?
> This is also a _dramatic_ change in culture - moving from a commit
> then review to a review then commit - this will dramatically s
The one change I'd like here is to add a note about post-merge, as a
reminder to not "merge and run".
Testing comprehensively before merging should cover most issues, but I
think it's woth adding a note that you should plan to wait for Jenkins
builds to complete successfully before considering you
Hi David,
For DNS, it looks like your SSVM can contact 192.168.56.1, but can't
resolve download.cloud.com using that server.
Maybe 192.168.56.1 isn't actually providing DNS services - what do you get
if you run "dig @192.168.56.1 download.cloud.com" ? I would have thought it
would fall back to 8.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13583784#comment-13583784
]
Dave Cahill commented on CLOUDSTACK-1278:
-
Frank just fixed a very sim
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13583767#comment-13583767
]
Dave Cahill commented on CLOUDSTACK-1347:
-
> So, the old d
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13582957#comment-13582957
]
Dave Cahill commented on CLOUDSTACK-1347:
-
I hit this in master today
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1173?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13582052#comment-13582052
]
Dave Cahill commented on CLOUDSTACK-1173:
-
After a long and messy debug
>
> Though I doubt what Brian and Jessica met was another problem, they
> sent out mail before I checked in the latest commit...
>
> --Sheng
>
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Dave Cahill wrote:
> > When I redeploy the database and run the management server for
When I redeploy the database and run the management server for the first
time, I get:
ERROR [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (main:)
com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Unknown column
'nics.ip6_gateway' in 'field list'
ERROR [cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker] (main:) Unable to ex
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13581920#comment-13581920
]
Dave Cahill commented on CLOUDSTACK-1328:
-
Hi Angeline,
I saw the logs
--Original Message-
> > From: dcah...@midokura.jp [mailto:dcah...@midokura.jp] On Behalf Of Dave
> > Cahill
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:19 PM
> > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: SystemVM ISO building broken in master?
> >
> > H
Dave Cahill created CLOUDSTACK-1336:
---
Summary: System VM ISO building broken
Key: CLOUDSTACK-1336
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1336
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13581904#comment-13581904
]
Dave Cahill commented on CLOUDSTACK-1328:
-
You may be able to get
Dave Cahill created CLOUDSTACK-1335:
---
Summary: SSH keys overwritten for user running management server
Key: CLOUDSTACK-1335
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1335
Project
Hi,
Running on HEAD of master, the contents of systemvm.iso don't seem to be
getting created correctly.
Investigating a template download failure on my SSVM yesterday, I found
this error:
root@s-1-VM:~# tail /var/log/cloud/cloud.out
09:33:58,224 WARN Script:452 - Unable to find script listvmtm
ing for any patch disk with a name
> similar ton the VM when it gets deleted.
> On Feb 19, 2013 2:07 AM, "Dave Cahill" wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Working on CloudStack in development mode (using jetty to run the
> > management server), I noticed that the Host
Hi,
Working on CloudStack in development mode (using jetty to run the
management server), I noticed that the Host's SSH keypairs and those in the
system VM ISO easily get out of sync.
After every database redeploy, the the management server generates a new
SSH keypair because the "ssh.privatekey"
Hi,
I'd like to make a change for 4.2, allowing the specification of different
VIF drivers per traffic type in KVM.
I have written up the proposal in Jira and Confluence:
Feature spec:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Allow+specification+of+different+VIF+drivers+per+traffic
Dave Cahill created CLOUDSTACK-1311:
---
Summary: Allow specification of different VIF drivers per traffic
type in KVM
Key: CLOUDSTACK-1311
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1311
Strongly agree. Master was very painful to work with last week.
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:43 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I know folks have said this elsewhere, but I'd like to reiterate it.
>
> I am somewhat frustrated with our reaction to broken builds. In
> general it seems we don
> my mac via VMware fusion, used qemu-img to migrate the qcow2 to vmdk)
> system is an i7-2600, with 16GB ram. What sort of memory/storage?
> Could the VM be swapping?
>
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Dave Cahill wrote:
> > The host is running Ubuntu 12.04, and has nested
Did you need to change the libvirt
> xml file at all? It does sound like it can't access the disk in the
> VM, or having a hard time doing so, or something like that.
>
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 3:33 AM, Dave Cahill wrote:
> > Sounds good, thanks Marcus. I'll try the ne
ervice
> cloudstack-management restart' will move this to devcloud-kvm.sql
>
> #set up marvin and auto-deploy test advanced zone (optional)
> mvn -P developer,systemvm clean install
> python tools/marvin/marvin/deployDataCenter.py -i
> tools/devcloud-kvm/devcloud-kvm-advanced.cfg
&
ks for me on a fresh install
> though.
> On Feb 14, 2013 6:41 PM, "Dave Cahill" wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've been working on getting devcloud-kvm up and running using master,
> and
> > I've hit a few issues - most were due to recent changes in mas
Hi,
I've been working on getting devcloud-kvm up and running using master, and
I've hit a few issues - most were due to recent changes in master and are
fixed now thanks to help from Rohit and Marcus. By the way, I should note
that the devcloud-kvm docs on the wiki are really great - couldn't have
{-cloud,}.xml
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Dave Cahill wrote:
> >>> logging for cloudstack-agent seems to work if I do 'mv
> >>> /etc/cloudstack/agent/log4j-cloud.xml
> >>> /etc/cloudstack/agen
>> logging for cloudstack-agent seems to work if I do 'mv
>> /etc/cloudstack/agent/log4j-cloud.xml
>> /etc/cloudstack/agent/log4j.xml'. Not sure what's going on there at
>> the moment, not familiar with log4j... anyone?
^ Thanks a million for this hint Marcus, worked great for me. Quite a bit
of l
ly
> works.
>
> Regards.
>
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Dave Cahill
> wrote:
> > This appears to have broken the build according to jenkins too:
> > https://builds.apache.org/job/cloudstack-master-maven/707/
> >
> > From jenkins' conso
does not exist.
around Ant part ..
@ 17:130 in
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/cloudstack-master-maven/client/target/antrun/build-main.xml
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Dave Cahill wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With a fresh checkout of master, I tried:
>
> mvn -P developer
Hi,
With a fresh checkout of master, I tried:
mvn -P developer,systemvm clean install
And got:
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-antrun-plugin:1.7:run
(generate-resource) on project cloud-client-ui: An Ant BuildException
has occured: /root/incubator-cloudstack/serv
Hi,
Recently I encountered two "nested virtualization" use cases which made me
want QEMU hypervisor support in CloudStack. I'm interested to hear if
anyone else is interested in this feature, and any notes on how it should
be implemented.
Here is a good explanation from OpenStack docs [2] on why
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dave Cahill updated CLOUDSTACK-996:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: Future)
4.2.0
> MidoNet network plu
> Dave / Pranav,
>
> I don't think that this is as complicated as is may seem at first.
>
> Here's what we have discussed previously:
> 1 - Do your development in a public repo (and share the location so
> that others can watch / help if they want).
> 2 - Make all technical discussions on this mail
iews. The committer would
> not merge them with as/master and keep them on hold until that period . **
> **
>
> Perhaps someone in the PPMC ( may be David Nalley or Chip or Animesh ) can
> better answer your last query .
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks,
>
> Pranav
>
>
and send review requests from there.
>
> Further discussions about the github non-committer workflow here -
> http://www.mail-archive.com/cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg02776.html.
>
> Thanks,
> Pranav
>
> -Original Message-
> From: dcah...@midokura.jp
n, Jan 21, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Sateesh Chodapuneedi <
sateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com> wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: dcah...@midokura.jp [mailto:dcah...@midokura.jp] On Behalf Of Dave
> > Cahill
> > Sent: 21 January 2013 10:46
> > To: cloudstack-
s" in the pom.xml (therefore not compiled by
default)
Comments and questions appreciated.
Thanks,
Dave.
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Dave Cahill wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> There were a few mentions on the list over the past few months [1] about
> creating a plugin to integra
Hi Hugo,
I was really interested to read this thread and to see your work on the
OvsVifDriver.
I've been looking at the VIF driver part of the KVM code and had a few
questions:
1. What do you think of the idea of allowing different VIF drivers per
traffic type?
>From reading commits, it looks l
Dave Cahill created CLOUDSTACK-996:
--
Summary: MidoNet network plugin
Key: CLOUDSTACK-996
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-996
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: New
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dave Cahill updated CLOUDSTACK-996:
---
Description:
More information about MidoNet itself here:
http://www.midokura.com/midonet
Hi all,
There were a few mentions on the list over the past few months [1] about
creating a plugin to integrate the MidoNet [2] SDN platform with CloudStack.
Since processes for new features have become better-defined since the
initial discussion, I'd like to start ticking the boxes to make sure
Great, thanks Marcus!
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> Impressive ! Well done marcus.
>
> -Sebastien
>
> On 16 Jan 2013, at 21:48, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>
> > Fantastic! Thanks Marcus!
> > We can have a kvm devcloud based CI which can be much faster, stable to
> evaluat
> > > }
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > How it was, looks right. If you're running as cloud it will generate
> > > > regardless, otherwise the dev flag has to be set:
> > > >
> > > > marcus@mlsorensen-bsdesk:~$ java TestCase cloud 0
hony
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dave Cahill [mailto:dcah...@midokura.jp]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 12:33 AM
> > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Security Groups Isolation in Advanced Zone
> >
> > Hi M
Hi Manan,
I'm interested in this feature - when (roughly) are you planning to commit
this to master?
Are you planning the full list of features from your requirements doc
(including support for Adavnced, Isolated networks) in 4.1?
Thanks in advance,
Dave.
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Manan
Hi,
There seem to be crossed wires about systemVM keypairs and whether the
management server can be run as a user other than "cloud".
On Nov 1st, in the mailing list thread "Setting the ssh.publickey and
ssh.privatekey options", we decided that if a user is in developer mode
(used mvn -P develope
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13508427#comment-13508427
]
Dave Cahill commented on CLOUDSTACK-563:
Hi Ilya,
In that case I'm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13507156#comment-13507156
]
Dave Cahill commented on CLOUDSTACK-563:
Are relevant providers Enable
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13507156#comment-13507156
]
Dave Cahill edited comment on CLOUDSTACK-563 at 11/30/12 7:1
Dave Cahill created CLOUDSTACK-510:
--
Summary: Add button not visible when adding public IPs to physical
network
Key: CLOUDSTACK-510
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-510
Project
012, at 1:19 PM, Dave Cahill wrote:
>
> > Thanks Rohit - filed this bug to track the issue:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-499
> >
> > If you have time to write a description of how you're planning to fix
> it, I
> > could take a look at
Dave.
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>
> On 15-Nov-2012, at 3:26 PM, Dave Cahill wrote:
>
> > Hi Rohit,
> >
> > I've been using cloudmonkey to script my CloudStack setup process in dev,
> > and had one question.
> >
> >
Dave Cahill created CLOUDSTACK-499:
--
Summary: cloudmonkey CLI can't accept complex parameters
Key: CLOUDSTACK-499
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-499
Project: Cloud
Hi Rohit,
I've been using cloudmonkey to script my CloudStack setup process in dev,
and had one question.
How do we pass complex (MAP) parameters to cloudmonkey? For example, when
setting up a networkoffering, there's a serviceProviderList parameter which
is a list of items, each of which has sev
lag.
> Previously if the user was not cloud then the ssh keys would be left
> intact.
>
> Certainly the upgrade case for production management servers will be
> impacted.
>
> On 11/14/12 6:48 PM, "Dave Cahill" wrote:
>
> >Hi Chiradeep,
> >
> &
stemvm and id_rsa.systemvm.pub?
Thanks,
Dave.
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Chiradeep Vittal <
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 11/14/12 6:11 PM, "Satoshi Kobayashi"
> wrote:
>
> >Hi Dave,
> >
> >2012/11/14 Dave Cahill :
> >> Hi,
&g
Hi,
I've recently been running the management server from source using mvn -pl
:cloud-client-ui jetty:run, and I've come across an issue.
If the "ssh.privatekey" configuration entry is not present in the
management server db, then in ConfigurationServerImpl:
Line 592:
File privkeyfile =
116c09d
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7923/diff/
Testing
---
Was running an Advanced Network with empty traffic labels, observed
NullPointerExceptions.
Made change, deployed, NullPointerExceptions no longer experienced.
Thanks,
Dave Cahill
e the deprecated options in.
Thanks,
Dave.
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>
> On 06-Nov-2012, at 8:36 AM, Dave Cahill wrote:
>
> > Hi Edison,
> >
> > Understood - sounds like .deb package building is not supposed to work on
> > master.
&
nstall listed in a wiki / doc anywhere?
Thanks,
Dave.
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Edison Su wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dave Cahill [mailto:dcah...@midokura.jp]
> > Sent: Monday, November 05, 2012 7:06 PM
> > To: cloudsta
Hi,
With the new site design, is there any way to make the old forum URLs still
valid?
All Google search results point at
http://incubator.apache.org/cloudstack/forum/..PATH...
, so anyone searching for CloudStack answers via Google right now is
getting all 404s when they click links to forum dis
Also worth pasting the output of:
python --version
IIRC the python scripts only work with Python 2.6.
Thanks,
Dave.
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Radhika Puthiyetath <
radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com> wrote:
> Hi Saikiran,
>
> Could you please give us more details-which build/ binaries you ar
on about the build
> system in the following the mail threads:
> http://markmail.org/message/lsjigqvnbkjtbl4y
> http://markmail.org/message/utce4esqjl7xhwr4
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Cahill [mailto:dcah...@midokura.jp]
> Sent: Monday, November 05, 2012 1:13 AM
>
find the discussion about the build
> system in the following the mail threads:
> http://markmail.org/message/lsjigqvnbkjtbl4y
> http://markmail.org/message/utce4esqjl7xhwr4
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Cahill [mailto:dcah...@midokura.jp]
> Sent: Monday, Novem
Hi,
There appear to be some errors in the debian package building process; I'd
like to double-check my approach for fixing them.
The wiki [1] gives the procedure for building debian packages as:
mvn install -P deps && dpkg-buildpackage
However, mvn install -P deps fails with:
[ERROR] Failed to
gt; To fix it on your setup, you can either re-deploy the DB - safer solution
> as we don't know which default values were persisted, and what was
> dropped; or set init=true and restart management server. Also if you
> re-deploy the DB, check if you see any exceptions in
R will help developer to debug the issue.
Here is the review link: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7861/
Thanks,
Dave.
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 2:55 AM, Edison Su wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dave Cahill [mailto:dcah...@midokura.jp]
> > Sent: Thursda
* WARN message is logged on management server startup when running as a user
other than cloud and developer key is not set
Thanks,
Dave Cahill
Hi,
Over the past few days, I've run into EntityExistsException several times
when I shut down and restart my management server:
ERROR [cloud.servlet.CloudStartupServlet] (main:) Exception starting
management server
javax.persistence.EntityExistsException: Entity already exists:
at com.cloud.util
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
