+1
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 10:12 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to invite the CloudStack community t
gt; ?
This addresses bug CLOUDSTACK-1575.
Diffs
-
engine/storage/volume/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/volume/VolumeServiceImpl.java
c019374
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9869/diff/
Testing
---
Tested locally. Upload Volume succeeded.
Thanks,
deepti dohare
> -Original Message-
> From: deepti dohare [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf Of
> deepti dohare
> Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 12:40 AM
> To: Chip Childers; Sateesh Chodapuneedi; Abhinandan Prateek; Devdeep
> Singh
> Cc: cloudstack; Deepti Dohare
> Sub
/com/cloud/agent/api/DeleteSnapshotBackupCommand.java 6114148
server/src/com/cloud/storage/snapshot/SnapshotManagerImpl.java c7beff0
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9801/diff/
Testing
---
Tested locally, able to delete snapshots.
Thanks,
deepti dohare
/com/cloud/storage/snapshot/SnapshotManagerImpl.java c7beff0
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9801/diff/
Testing
---
Tested locally, able to delete snapshots.
Thanks,
deepti dohare
Thanks Alex for the comments. Sure I will get in touch with Prachi regarding
this.
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang
> Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 5:50 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: Deepti Dohare; Prachi Damle
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] D
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13590277#comment-13590277
]
deepti dohare commented on CLOUDSTACK-1337:
---
root@s-11-VM:~# iptable
ce
> provider always has capacity i.e. request for a VM should not fail, unless
> there are any specific conditions attached (such as request with a tag and
> there is no host that has that tag available etc.)
>
> Hari
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Deepti Dohare [ma
Hi,
I am investigating the issue
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1337, copy template/Iso across
zones is failing in branch 4.1, giving the error "HTTP Server returned 403
(expected 200 OK)" and there is a workaround mentioned in
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUD
. Template Creation:
Verified: templates successfully created from the above snapshots
3. Volume creation:
Verified: volumes successfully created from the above snapshots
4. VM Migration
Migrate i-1 from Host-1 to Host-2.
Verified: Secondary mount point successfully created on Host-2.
Thank
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13588157#comment-13588157
]
deepti dohare commented on CLOUDSTACK-1353:
---
Facing same issue
Congrats Sateesh!!
Regards,
Deepti
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 7:45 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: New committer: Sateesh Chodapuneedi
>
> The Podling Project Management Committee (PP
Congrats Radhika!!
Regards,
Deepti
> -Original Message-
> From: Vaibhav Gupta [mailto:vaibhav.gu...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 9:35 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: Radhika Puthiyetath
> Subject: RE: New committer: Radhika Puthiyetath
>
> Congratula
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13585820#comment-13585820
]
deepti dohare commented on CLOUDSTACK-1337:
---
Copy template to other
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
deepti dohare resolved CLOUDSTACK-357.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> ISOs can be deleted while still attached to a running
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13585812#comment-13585812
]
deepti dohare commented on CLOUDSTACK-1337:
---
I downloaded the temp
attached to any vm)
2. Deleting iso(attached to multiple vms in same domain)
3. Deleting iso(attached to multiple vms in different domains)
For admin/user
Thanks,
deepti dohare
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13584078#comment-13584078
]
deepti dohare commented on CLOUDSTACK-1337:
---
I am able to download
://reviews.apache.org/r/7660/diff/
Testing
---
Verified locally. Tested for some cases:
1. Deleting iso(not attached to any vm)
2. Deleting iso(attached to multiple vms in same domain)
3. Deleting iso(attached to multiple vms in different domains)
For admin/user
Thanks,
deepti dohare
. Tested for some cases:
1. Deleting iso(not attached to any vm)
2. Deleting iso(attached to multiple vms in same domain)
3. Deleting iso(attached to multiple vms in different domains)
For admin/user
Thanks,
deepti dohare
t; > further use.
> > In the storage cleanup thread check whether the iso is detached for the vms
> > and if it is then delete it from the sec. storage.
>
> deepti dohare wrote:
> Nitin, I agree with you and will update the patch with the suggestions
> you gave.
When
admin/user
Thanks,
deepti dohare
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/7660/#review16634
---
On Feb. 15, 2013, 5:02 a.m., deepti dohare wrote:
>
> -
3. Can you please elaborate more on the 3rd point.
- deepti
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/7594/#review16631
--------
i-1 from Host-1 to Host-2.
Verified: Secondary mount point successfully created on Host-2.
Thanks,
deepti dohare
://reviews.apache.org/r/7660/diff/
Testing
---
Verified locally. Tested for some cases:
1. Deleting iso(not attached to any vm)
2. Deleting iso(attached to multiple vms in same domain)
3. Deleting iso(attached to multiple vms in different domains)
For admin/user
Thanks,
deepti dohare
Congrats Likitha :)
> -Original Message-
> From: Devdeep Singh [mailto:devdeep.si...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 8:20 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: New committer: Likitha Shetty
>
> Congrats Likitha.
>
> > -Original Message-
> >
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-818?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
deepti dohare updated CLOUDSTACK-818:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0)
4.2.0
> Document Dedicate
ti
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9182/#review16312
-------
On Feb. 7, 2013, 3:05 p.m., deepti dohare wrote:
>
&g
if Host has dedicated vms, vm is placed in that host
- if Host has no dedicated vms, request failed.
2. Host tag is provided and isDedicated flag is false
- if Host has dedicated vms, request failed.
- if Host has no dedicated vms, vm is placed in that host (as cloudstack
is doing now)
Thanks,
deepti dohare
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
deepti dohare updated CLOUDSTACK-681:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0)
4.2.0
> Dedicate Pod, Clus
Hi,
I observed this exception when I pulled the code from the master branch,
deployed the db and run the jetty server.
mvn -pl :cloud-client-ui jetty:run
I am getting following CloudRuntimeException
===
INFO [cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage
ed vms, request failed.
2. Host tag is provided and isDedicated flag is false
- if Host has dedicated vms, request failed.
- if Host has no dedicated vms, vm is placed in that host (as cloudstack
is doing now)
Thanks,
deepti dohare
Thanks,
deepti dohare
ost
- if Host has no dedicated vms, request failed.
2. Host tag is provided and isDedicated flag is false
- if Host has dedicated vms, request failed.
- if Host has no dedicated vms, vm is placed in that host (as cloudstack
is doing now)
Thanks,
deepti dohare
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-718?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
deepti dohare updated CLOUDSTACK-718:
-
Description:
This feature will allow to add a service offering that will indicate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-718?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
deepti dohare reopened CLOUDSTACK-718:
--
This feature is a part of CLOUDSTACK-681, which is implemented first. So
reopening
quest failed.
2. Host tag is provided and isDedicated flag is false
- if Host has dedicated vms, request failed.
- if Host has no dedicated vms, vm is placed in that host (as cloudstack
is doing now)
Thanks,
deepti dohare
Hi Kiran,
See my comments inline.
Thanks
Deepti
-Original Message-
From: Kiran Koneti
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 3:16 PM
To: Deepti Dohare
Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Regarding the Dedicated Resources - Private pod, cluster, host
Functional Spec .
Hi Deepti
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-718?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
deepti dohare resolved CLOUDSTACK-718.
--
Resolution: Duplicate
Duplicating it to CLOUDSTACK-681
> VMs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-718?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
deepti dohare reopened CLOUDSTACK-718:
--
trying to duplicate it to 681 properly
> VMs on hardware dedicated
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
deepti dohare updated CLOUDSTACK-681:
-
Description:
Currently in CloudStack architecture, domains can have dedicated zones
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
deepti dohare updated CLOUDSTACK-681:
-
Description:
Currently in CloudStack architecture, domains can have dedicated zones
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-718?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
deepti dohare resolved CLOUDSTACK-718.
--
Resolution: Duplicate
This feature is merged in https://issues.apache.org/jira
e domain having dedicated resources,
CloudStack will allow the user to use non-dedicated resources based on the
global parameter "Implicit dedication flag".
>
> Thanks
> Saurav Lahiri
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Deepti Dohare
> wrote:
>
> > Th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-818?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13551795#comment-13551795
]
deepti dohare commented on CLOUDSTACK-818:
--
Having a private zone per do
Verified: Secondary mount point successfully created on Host-2.
Thanks,
deepti dohare
rry a planner name to use.
> - deploy vm code should use the planner that's specified in the
> service
> offering.
>
> --Alex
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Deepti Dohare [mailto:deepti.doh...@citrix.com]
> > Sent: Monday, January 07, 2
> >>> However, for enforcing that a dedicated resource is picked up for
> >>> servicing deploy vm requests from a user; wouldn't planners and
> >>> allocators have to be updated to take care of this?
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-718?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
deepti dohare reassigned CLOUDSTACK-718:
Assignee: deepti dohare
> VMs on hardware dedicated to a specific acco
configure this affinity.
>
> Regards
> Saurav
>
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Deepti Dohare
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Mice,
> >
> > Once a new pod is dedicated to the child-domain, deployment of the
> > new VMs will happen only in the new pod.
> > T
Hi Mice,
Once a new pod is dedicated to the child-domain, deployment of the new VMs
will happen only in the new pod.
The existing VMs will keep running on parent-domain's pod.
Do you have any other suggestion on this.
- Deepti
> -Original Message-
> From: Mice Xia [mailto:weiran.x...@
My comments inline...
- Deepti
-Original Message-
From: Anthony Xu
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 12:55 PM
To: Deepti Dohare; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Dedicated Resources: Dedicate Pods, Clusters, Hosts to a
then CloudStack should fail the operation
> for a user in that domain.
If this happens, how does admin handle this?
Can admin extend resource for this domain?
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Deepti Dohare [mailto:deepti.doh...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, Dece
Hi,
Currently in CloudStack architecture, domains can have dedicated zones but not
pods, clusters or hosts.
We are proposing this functionality in "Dedicated Resources" where a domain or
a sub-domain can have dedicated pods, clusters or hosts.
Why we need this feature:
Dedicating a zone might
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
deepti dohare updated CLOUDSTACK-681:
-
Assignee: deepti dohare
> Dedicate Pod, Cluster or Host to a dom
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
deepti dohare updated CLOUDSTACK-681:
-
Summary: Dedicate Pod, Cluster or Host to a domain (was: Dedicated Pod,
Cluster or
deepti dohare created CLOUDSTACK-681:
Summary: Dedicated Pod, Cluster or Host to a domain
Key: CLOUDSTACK-681
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-681
Project: CloudStack
deepti dohare created CLOUDSTACK-458:
Summary: xen:snapshots:Storage gc fail to clean the failed
snapshot images from secondarystorage
Key: CLOUDSTACK-458
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13481217#comment-13481217
]
deepti dohare commented on CLOUDSTACK-357:
--
Review request submitted: h
A gentle reminder!
- Thanks,
Deepti
From: deepti dohare [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf Of deepti
dohare
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 12:56 PM
To: cloudstack; Deepti Dohare
Subject: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-357 ISOs can be deleted while still
attached to a running VM
A gentle reminder!
- Thanks,
Deepti
From: deepti dohare [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf Of deepti
dohare
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 11:34 AM
To: Anthony Xu; Nitin Mehta
Cc: cloudstack; David Nalley; Deepti Dohare
Subject: Re: Review Request: Snapshot errors with multiple
. Deleting iso(not attached to any vm)
2. Deleting iso(attached to multiple vms in same domain)
3. Deleting iso(attached to multiple vms in different domains)
For admin/user
Thanks,
deepti dohare
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13476783#comment-13476783
]
deepti dohare commented on CLOUDSTACK-357:
--
Currently no warnin
deepti dohare created CLOUDSTACK-357:
Summary: ISOs can be deleted while still attached to a running VM,
and they subsequently cannot be detached from a running VM
Key: CLOUDSTACK-357
URL: https
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
deepti dohare reassigned CLOUDSTACK-357:
Assignee: deepti dohare
> ISOs can be deleted while still attached t
on
Migrate i-1 from Host-1 to Host-2.
Verified: Secondary mount point successfully created on Host-2.
Thanks,
deepti dohare
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
deepti dohare reassigned CLOUDSTACK-356:
Assignee: deepti dohare
> snapshot errors with multiple secondary stor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13476773#comment-13476773
]
deepti dohare commented on CLOUDSTACK-356:
--
Submitted a patch on Re
deepti dohare created CLOUDSTACK-356:
Summary: snapshot errors with multiple secondary storage in one
zone
Key: CLOUDSTACK-356
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-356
Project
ly created from the above snapshots
3. Volume creation:
Verified: volumes successfully created from the above snapshots
4. VM Migration
Migrate i-1 from Host-1 to Host-2.
Verified: Secondary mount point successfully created on Host-2.
Thanks,
deepti dohare
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-83?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13454776#comment-13454776
]
deepti dohare commented on CLOUDSTACK-83:
-
looking into this issue but am
nt.
Tested for resources: instances, volume, snapshots and templates.
- deepti
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/5806/#review10636
---------
ata volume, succeeded
4.create one more snapshot, failed, "maximum limit exceeded for account user"
Thanks,
deepti dohare
ata volume
3.trigger 3 create snapshot command from the above data volume, succeeded
4.create one more snapshot, failed, "maximum limit exceeded for account user"
Thanks,
deepti dohare
; Deepti Dohare
Subject: RE: Review Request: CS-15395 updateResourceLimit does not give any
warning/error if limit is set lower than the current resources used by an
account
I think we shouldn’t make this change. Since resources can always be destroyed
I would want to give the admin flexibility to set
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6276/diff/
Testing
---
Verified locally.
Thanks,
deepti dohare
Congratulations Pranav
-Deepti
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 11:14 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: new committer: Pranav Saxena
The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack has
---
Steps to verify:
1.Login as admin, set snapshot limit '3' for a user account
2.login as user, create a VM1 with data volume
3.trigger 3 create snapshot command from the above data volume, succeeded
4.create one more snapshot, failed, "maximum limit exceeded for account user&quo
or message: "Maximum number of resources of type 'volume' for account
name=d2user in domain id=3 has been exceeded"
Thanks,
deepti dohare
ximum number of resources of type 'volume' for account
name=d2user in domain id=3 has been exceeded"
Thanks,
deepti dohare
ata volume, succeeded
4.create one more snapshot, failed, "maximum limit exceeded for account user"
Thanks,
deepti dohare
sources of type 'volume' for account
name=d2user in domain id=3 has been exceeded"
Thanks,
deepti dohare
mp;max=1&account=sa1&domainid=4&apikey=3SeISbzeq0V304jxlfGaQgnLvGRcbgQnOzgiEnpsm-gL2qUgYsEw3CQYAlEn2Z9N3AOuZs_uAFywI8s87r5ZDQ&signature=Wc336kdIFT33FWwdJUVwr2h1vH8%3d
response:
sa1
179a496a-d157-4851-a4ec-a29e84e7b32f
SD1
0
1
Thanks,
deepti dohare
&resourcetype=0&max=1&account=sa1&domainid=4&apikey=3SeISbzeq0V304jxlfGaQgnLvGRcbgQnOzgiEnpsm-gL2qUgYsEw3CQYAlEn2Z9N3AOuZs_uAFywI8s87r5ZDQ&signature=Wc336kdIFT33FWwdJUVwr2h1vH8%3d
response:
sa1
179a496a-d157-4851-a4ec-a29e84e7b32f
SD1
0
1
Thanks,
deepti dohare
Hi,
A domain admin can't update the resource limit through UI but can update
through API.
API: Caller is domain admin
url :
http://localhost:8080/client/api?command=updateResourceLimit&resourcetype=0&max=6&account=u1&domainid=2&apikey=_38ICSSeHVGAS10FjAZdd31zn4-QOfrMi-aEEYEJbNetVusB4mNjJtN2oP
I have added a patch (https://reviews.apache.org/r/5573/diff/#index_header) for
CS-15300. It enables a domain admin account to respect the limits.
This bug also state that domain admin shouldn't have the right to create
infinite resources. In this case what should be the maximum limit of the
gnLvGRcbgQnOzgiEnpsm-gL2qUgYsEw3CQYAlEn2Z9N3AOuZs_uAFywI8s87r5ZDQ&signature=Wc336kdIFT33FWwdJUVwr2h1vH8%3d
response:
sa1
179a496a-d157-4851-a4ec-a29e84e7b32f
SD1
0
1
Thanks,
deepti dohare
OuZs_uAFywI8s87r5ZDQ&signature=Wc336kdIFT33FWwdJUVwr2h1vH8%3d
response:
sa1
179a496a-d157-4851-a4ec-a29e84e7b32f
SD1
0
1
Thanks,
deepti dohare
Signed-off-by: Deepti Dohare
---
server/src/com/cloud/api/ApiServlet.java |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/server/src/com/cloud/api/ApiServlet.java
b/server/src/com/cloud/api/ApiServlet.java
index 1c24191..2d06ef7 100755
--- a/server/src/com/cloud/api
Signed-off-by: Deepti Dohare
---
server/src/com/cloud/api/ApiServlet.java |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/server/src/com/cloud/api/ApiServlet.java
b/server/src/com/cloud/api/ApiServlet.java
index b7b7fff..1c24191 100755
--- a/server/src/com/cloud
Signed-off-by: Deepti Dohare
---
server/src/com/cloud/api/ApiServlet.java |8 +++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/server/src/com/cloud/api/ApiServlet.java
b/server/src/com/cloud/api/ApiServlet.java
index b7b7fff..dcdb45f 100755
--- a/server/src/com/cloud
Signed-off-by: Deepti Dohare
---
server/src/com/cloud/api/ApiServlet.java |7 ++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/server/src/com/cloud/api/ApiServlet.java
b/server/src/com/cloud/api/ApiServlet.java
index b7b7fff..ba4856e 100755
--- a/server/src/com/cloud
Hi Mohammad,
My preferred usernames are:
1. deepti.dohare
2. deeptidohare
3. deeptid
Thanks
Deepti Dohare
From: nour.moham...@gmail.com [mailto:nour.moham...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Mohammad Nour El-Din
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 6:13 PM
To: Deepti Dohare
Cc: cloudstack-dev
94 matches
Mail list logo
