>
>This assumes that there is a common pool of IP addresses available -
>which assumes things like BGP are in place and routing packets between
>multiple datacenters/providers and that you are interacting with BGP
>properly.
>
>I'll be frank and say that the complexity and interaction with systems
, Domain Id:1| 2 | 1 | 1 |
>2013-03-21 05:24:45 | INFO |0 | NULL |0 |
>
>
>-Thanks
>Sangeetha
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Murali Reddy [mailto:murali.re...@citrix.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 7:18 AM
>
Kelven, I see that you fixed action event issue in below commit. But I am
still running into some issues. While working on CLOUDSTACK-1673 I noticed
that in case of AccountManagerImpl, there are multiple methods with same
name. So in that case getAnnotation on the method is returning null even
tho
ment38270>
>
>Create in remove path?
>
>
>
>plugins/network-elements/netscaler/src/com/cloud/network/resource/Netscale
>rResource.java
><https://reviews.apache.org/r/10021/#comment38271>
>
>This is taken care alre
I would like to merge GSLB feature proposed [1] and developed in the feature
branch [2] into master. Code for this feature pretty much conforms to what was
proposed in FS [3]. I added unit tests for all the new service layer methods
introduced[4]. I have made the patch available at [5], if any o
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10021/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Murali Reddy.
Description
---
Merge
the IP
address allocation is scattered then how does routing will work? If
CloudStack just assumes that public IP (non RFC 1918) can be
moved/allocated across the zones, then (irrespective of EIP service is
enabled or not) we have can public IP pools configured at region level.
But question is, is it
On 16/03/13 1:46 AM, "Will Stevens" wrote:
>
>1. Restrict the available subnets for each account so two accounts can't
>create overlapping subnets.
>To me, this breaks the whole concept of cloud, but for enterprise
>customers
>this is not a huge limitation because they usually solve this problem t
I would like to propose enhancing current EIP functionality (currently
available in basic zone). I have made a case for this feature earlier [2] and
captured requirements in the feature bug [2]. This proposal would like to
introduce following functionality.
1. EIP service with in 'advanced'
On 13/03/13 3:14 PM, "Donal Lafferty" wrote:
>
>WRT #2: C# code on a .NET framework classes is a well-supported
>implementation option. The code's copyright would be held by Apache
>CloudStack. The libraries on which it depended would be proprietary to
>Microsoft (.NET Runtime, and ASP.NET Web
: 2feda05ecd15d7fe63bd986868de2844340acec6
Parents: b4bab5a
Author: Murali Reddy mailto:murali.re...@citrix.com>>
Authored: Wed Mar 13 17:17:12 2013 +0530
Committer: Murali Reddy
mailto:murali.re...@citrix.com>>
Committed: Wed Mar 13 17:30:15 2013 +0530
Also with out staging, features developed by non-commiters else where,
even with good code review in place there is always possibility of
regression after feature merge into master.
On 07/03/13 10:41 AM, "Murali Reddy" wrote:
>On 06/03/13 11:52 PM, "Kelven Yang" wro
On 06/03/13 11:52 PM, "Kelven Yang" wrote:
>First +1 on BVT.
>
>Second, should we consider the idea of having a staging area for people to
>check-in? Which is that making master always the stable(reasonable) branch
>for main development, but whenever people make check-ins, it goes into
>staging
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Murali Reddy resolved CLOUDSTACK-1391.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> EventBus is not getting injected after javelin me
Hugo,
In the current model, components that are not needed by default are not
present in componentContext.xml. Just in case if you have not noticed, in
4.1, NiciraNvp bean is not enabled by default :). Admin needs to edit
componentContext.xml, to enable a optional component.
Thanks!
On 26/02/13
Murali Reddy created CLOUDSTACK-1391:
Summary: EventBus is not getting injected after javelin merge
Key: CLOUDSTACK-1391
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1391
Project
trailing
white spaces. i see some commented out code, Plz remove them.
- Murali Reddy
On Feb. 19, 2013, 4:19 p.m., Jayapal Reddy wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.
icDaoImpl.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/9396/#comment36076>
I do not see any use of this search by secondary IP set, when you are
passing the Nic id
- Murali Reddy
On Feb. 19, 2013, 4:19 p.m., Jayapal Reddy wrote:
>
> --
ea3db2f073a5076d7822497a3032a0cd2d47a297
Author: Saksham Srivastava
Date: Fri Feb 22 15:46:45 2013 +0530
- Murali Reddy
On Feb. 19, 2013, 12:57 p.m., Saksham Srivastava wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit
I have added below dependency in plugins/event-bus/rabbitmq/pom.xml
com.rabbitmq
amqp-client
2.8.7
On 13/02/13 3:43 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>Hoping that everyone that has worked on new features for 4.1 can take a
>moment to help ensure that we have properly accounted fo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Murali Reddy resolved CLOUDSTACK-1241.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix commited in both 4.1, master
> Netw
Murali Reddy created CLOUDSTACK-1241:
Summary: Network apply rules logic is broken
Key: CLOUDSTACK-1241
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1241
Project: CloudStack
he network, that is inclusive
of guest_vm_cidr and IP address that can be allocated out side cloudstack
setup/db/db/schema-40to410.sql
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/9180/#comment34900>
you should be using 4.1 to 4.2 upgrade script
- Murali Reddy
On Feb. 8, 2013, 9:39 a.m., Saksham
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Murali Reddy resolved CLOUDSTACK-1208.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Murali Reddy
Fix submitted for both 4.1 master
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Murali Reddy resolved CLOUDSTACK-1178.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Murali Reddy
fixed in both master and 4.1
Murali Reddy created CLOUDSTACK-1182:
Summary: ApiDiscoveryService to present filtered view of API's
based on parameters (entity type, since when etc)
Key: CLOUDSTACK-1182
URL: https://issues.apache.org
On 06/02/13 4:12 AM, "Prachi Damle" wrote:
>
>As per discussions below, the scope of the feature now consists of a
>generic framework for defining affinity groups in CloudStack and a
>default implementation to support host affinity and anti-affinity.
Prachi,
When the granularity of affinity/ant
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-820?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572197#comment-13572197
]
Murali Reddy commented on CLOUDSTACK-820:
-
Merged into master with b
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Murali Reddy updated CLOUDSTACK-265:
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0)
4.2.0
> Optional Public
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Murali Reddy updated CLOUDSTACK-312:
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0)
4.2.0
> enable L4-L7 netw
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Murali Reddy reassigned CLOUDSTACK-272:
---
Assignee: Murali Reddy
> Delete failure message for network with a VM is
only from
the guest CIDR range when its different from the network CIDR?
- Murali Reddy
On Feb. 1, 2013, 10:34 a.m., saksham srivastava wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit
o you expect the guest_cidr's to be null after upgrade or same as cidr?
- Murali Reddy
On Feb. 1, 2013, 10:34 a.m., saksham srivastava wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To
- Murali Reddy
On Feb. 1, 2013, 9:22 a.m., Likitha Shetty wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apach
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9236/#review15994
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Murali Reddy
On Feb. 1, 2013, 8:32 a.m
not
applying. Can you please rebase to new master and the new patch.
Otherwise changes look good.
- Murali Reddy
On Jan. 31, 2013, 3:40 p.m., Likitha Shetty wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To rep
/DeleteEgressFirewallRuleCmd.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/9236/#comment34293>
need entity type here as well
- Murali Reddy
On Feb. 1, 2013, 6:48 a.m., Jayapal Reddy wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9131/#review15990
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Murali Reddy
On Feb. 1, 2013, 1:03 a.m
2:51 AM, "Chiradeep Vittal"
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 1/31/13 9:21 AM, "Kishan Kavala" wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 31-Jan-2013, at 9:36 PM, "Chip Childers"
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Jan 3
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Murali Reddy updated CLOUDSTACK-653:
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0)
4.2.0
Affects Version/s
On 30/01/13 11:31 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal"
wrote:
>For the account sync, we can make use of the new event framework: instead
>of calling account sync inline with account creation, simply emit an
>event.
>The event can be consumed by the account sync service.
Chiradeep,
It's good idea to use eve
On 31/01/13 12:34 AM, "Frank Zhang" wrote:
>
>Sorry, I may have not made my question clear.
>Publisher doesn't have to be aware of consumer, but it must know the
>binding key.
>Now I reread the below statement I think I got your idea is:
>When subscriber subscribes an event, the framework creates
expect admin to setup the
necessary flow information through controller for shared networks?
Regards,
Murali
From: Kanzhe Jiang
mailto:kanzhe.ji...@bigswitch.com>>
Date: Thursday, 31 January 2013 1:28 AM
To: Murali Reddy mailto:murali.re...@citrix.com>>
Cc:
"cloudstack-dev@incuba
On 30/01/13 10:24 PM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote:
>Are you on Windows? If so cannot help you much, you have an evil
>development environment. Killing the process (task manager or
>otherwise) and starting the mgmt server after few secs may work.
I see it on mac as well :) keep running into 'out of memo
Chip,
Thanks for taking care of legal docs. I will include the legal
documentation when I merge.
On 30/01/13 8:10 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Chip Childers
> wrote:
>> 3) One of us has to take care of the legal docs. I'll actually take
>> care of it directly i
On 30/01/13 2:24 PM, "Mice Xia" wrote:
>Agreed.
>Adding VM states are likely to have some side-effects, but for
>moveVMToUser case, does it explicitly reject other transient states such
>as stating/stopping/migrating?
>
>-Mice
No, it just accepts any state other than 'Running' (though it should
rvServerDiscoverer.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/9143/#comment34125>
How does find() launches the agent on Hyper-V host? I could not understand
how waitForHostConnect() will succeed.
- Murali Reddy
On Jan. 29, 2013, 9:43 p.m., Donal Lafferty wrote:
>
> --
>
>Ok. this makes more sense as I think there would not be too many
>subscribers.
>So you would notify publisher that a new queue has been created? Otherwise
>how does publisher push the events out?
Generally idea of pub-sub model is that publisher/subscriber need not be
aware the existence of ot
cks the operation if VM state is Running, but
will succeed if the state is 'RunningSnapshotting' which is un-intended.
>
>-Mice
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Murali Reddy [mailto:murali.re...@citrix.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 3:12 PM
>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Potential impact and notes:
>>> * 4 new states are added to VM state Machine
Mice,
When the VM is in transient states (RunningSnapshotting,
StoppedSnapshotting), I see that you have taken care of vmsync. But have
you ensured that all the concurrent operations on the VM are blocked
>Great to see this being close to coming into master! A couple of
>questions:
>
>1 - I don't seem to be able to find any new unit tests that cover the
>feature. Are there any that I'm missing?
I am working on unit tests. I will update the thread once I have unit
tests pushed to feature branch
Kanze,
Thanks for the patch. On first look patch look good, but I will do a
detailed review tomorrow.
Meanwhile could you help me understand how the network is
provisioned/de-provisioned through the contrloller? I understand that you
plan to support Vlan isolation only for 4.1, so what is the ro
>Murali,
>
>The use of Rabbit is still a question for me. It seems like you went
>with Rabbit, but the answer you gave as to "why" [1] didn't really
>answer the question or respond to the issue I raised about the
>practicalities of AMQP differences between versions and brokers [2].
>Can you addres
On 29/01/13 12:37 AM, "Frank Zhang" wrote:
>Sorry I may be late on this topic
>
>> Routing is designed to have the format.
>>
>> Event-source.Event-Category.Event-Type.Resource.ResourceUUID. For e.g.
>> A message is published with a routing key:
>> management-server:ActionEvent:SNAPSHOT-CREATE:S
I would like to request merge of events framework [4] branch changes in to
master to branch.
I have proposed a while ago [1], about the need for a framework to
Publish-Subscribe CloudStack to events. Initially I was planning to use
simple in-memory based publish-subscribe mechanism using google ev
urali,
>Thank you. will it appears in next version of CloudStack? When will the
>next version will release?
>
>Thank you.
>
>Mark
>From: Murali Reddy
>Date: 2013-01-25 14:34
>To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; li_fuqiong
>Subject: Re: Does CloudStack support o
On 25/01/13 11:21 AM, "li_fuqiong" wrote:
>Dear All,
>Does CloudStack support openflow? If no, is there any plan to support?
>
>Thanks.
>Mark
Its under progress
(https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/BigSwitch+Networkin
g+Plugin) would support floodlight and BVS.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Murali Reddy updated CLOUDSTACK-652:
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0)
4.2.0
> High Availability:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13559386#comment-13559386
]
Murali Reddy commented on CLOUDSTACK-655:
-
moved to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Murali Reddy updated CLOUDSTACK-654:
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0)
4.2.0
> ELB: auto-scale requ
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Murali Reddy updated CLOUDSTACK-655:
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0)
4.2.0
> framework
As data centres get virtualised and edge services are pushed into virtual
machines for agility, traditional security practices (like DMZ) are
challenged IMO. A good 'defense-in-depth' strategy built-in to
architecture would be desirable. With the efforts in Javelin branch, in
near term it should be
Thanks for the review. Please find the comments inline. In this spec I
tried to captures what I think will be high level design of this feature.
Specifics on the finer implementation details will be clear as I progress
with development. I will update the spec when feature in decent shape.
On 18/01
>
>So if I understand this correctly, the message bus is only used by the
>management server as a queue for events to forward to some other
>endpoint?
Chip,
Message bus is just abstraction (with publish, subscribe, unsubscribe
semantics), used to push action events, alerts, usage events and reso
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-820?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13557188#comment-13557188
]
Murali Reddy commented on CLOUDSTACK-820:
-
Quick update:
I have b
c. Please check with Hugo if he had run into any issues
related to this behaviour.
thanks,
Murali
>
>thanks,
>
>Joe
>
>
>On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Murali Reddy
>wrote:
>
>>
>> I guess this could be due to differences in ReservationStrategy 'Create&#x
I would like to call a vote for the Apache CloudStack project to accept a
donation from Citrix to provide Optional Public IP assignment for EIP with
Basic Zone.
The functional specification is available at [1] and has been discussed [2]
with no outstanding issues. Bug 265 [3] opened to track th
I would like to call a vote for the Apache CloudStack project to accept a
donation from Citrix to support network services (PF, NAT, LB) in shared
networks of advanced zone.
The functional specification is available at [1] and has been discussed [2]
with no outstanding issues.
Patch [3] and MD
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13555929#comment-13555929
]
Murali Reddy commented on CLOUDSTACK-653:
-
requirements and design has
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Murali Reddy updated CLOUDSTACK-653:
Description:
Introduce the ability in CloudStack to orchestrate setting up 'g
I guess this could be due to differences in ReservationStrategy 'Create'
and 'Start'. Both the strategies would need a prepare, but require release
only for 'Start' reservation strategy.
Please refer to [1] for explanation of reservation strategies.
[1]http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/in
On 16/01/13 2:01 AM, "Animesh Chaturvedi"
wrote:
>Murali
>
>Did you revert CLOUDSTACK-312 & 265? If not please do so at the earliest.
>Also please provide update on the code posting for community review as we
>have to get started on IP clearance quickly.
>
>Thanks
>Animesh
>
Animesh,
I have re
+Balancing)+Functional+specification+and+Design+Document
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-652
On 11/01/13 2:32 PM, "Murali Reddy" wrote:
>On 11/01/13 2:55 AM, "Chiradeep Vittal"
>wrote:
>
>>Thanks for the detailed and enlightening write-up
On 15/01/13 12:03 PM, "Anshul Gangwar" wrote:
>My comments inline..
>
>On 14/01/13 22:52, Alex Huang wrote:
>> Anshul,
>>
>> I had assumed that if you were doing this based on Murali's event
>>framework, it would not be architected on an adapter in the alert
>>manager but as a subscriber to his e
is not
>missed. What ends up happening is that there's a lot of information, but
>incoherently organized. Nice job.
>
>
>On 1/8/13 12:52 PM, "Murali Reddy" wrote:
>
>>In continuation to my proposal [1], I am brining GSLB support
>>separately for discussion
On 10/01/13 8:16 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 1:00 AM, Murali Reddy
>wrote:
>> On 09/01/13 8:36 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>>>
>>>CLOUDSTACK-777
>>>This is in the CloudPlatform 3.0.6 release
>>>Doc
>
>Unfortunately the VirtualNetworkApplianceManager behaves both as a plugin
>and an orchestrator making it a bad example of how to develop a network
>plugin.
Chiradeep,
If time permits I was planning to partially clean-up
VirtualNetworkApplianceManager as part of the CLOUDSTACK-655 [1] which i
On 09/01/13 8:36 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>
>CLOUDSTACK-777
>This is in the CloudPlatform 3.0.6 release
>Docs already submitted, but no FS available.
>Unable to find dev list discussion
I believe reporter of CLOUDSTACK-777 mistakenly opened duplicate of the
bug [1]. FS for bug 312 is at [2] an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13547704#comment-13547704
]
Murali Reddy commented on CLOUDSTACK-653:
-
Functional requirements
On 08/01/13 2:35 PM, "Likitha Shetty" wrote:
>In the FS I have proposed we use the 'persistent' flag with the API's. I
>have added this item under 'Open Issues' for now. Will update the FS
>based on the discussion in this list.
>
>Since a network offering is used by an admin to define the feature
In continuation to my proposal [1], I am brining GSLB support
separately for discussion. I have put up functional specification and
design documentation at [2]. Please provide feedback, comments.
Quick abstract of the feature:
Today CloudStack supports load balancing traffic across the VM instanc
notification service it self, need not be
part of CloudStack.
>
>> On 12/20/12 3:46 AM, "Murali Reddy" wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Hey Murali,
>>>>
>>>>Great to hear about where you stand right now. Is the code (work in
>&
Murali Reddy created CLOUDSTACK-820:
---
Summary: Events framework to publish/subscribe to CloudStack
events
Key: CLOUDSTACK-820
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-820
Project
Done. Pushed to both 4.0 and master branch.
On 04/01/13 8:54 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>Kelvin / Murali,
>
>You guys are listed as specific reviewers for Koushik's patch. If you
>are the appropriate folks, can we please get this done today? If not,
>please say so...
>
>Joe's trying to get a 4
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8432/#review15109
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Murali Reddy
On Dec. 8, 2012, 4:18 p.m
Great to see this proposal. Do you intend to keep plug-in compatible only
with BVS application or will it work with FloodLight controller as well?
On 03/01/13 11:50 AM, "Kanzhe Jiang" wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>Happy New Year to Everyone!
>First of all, I am new to the community and very excited to have
On 03/01/13 12:33 AM, "David Nalley" wrote:
>Interesting stuff. How and why did you decide on RabbitMQ?
David,
Default plug-in I am adding for event bus assumes AMQP. I have used
RabbitMQ AMQP client. But the AMQP server it self could be any
implementation of AMQP. Though I have not tested, Rabb
On 22/12/12 5:13 AM, "Prasanna Santhanam"
wrote:
>On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 04:54:54AM +0530, Manan Shah wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to propose a new feature for adding external LB support
>> to Shared Networks. I have created a JIRA ticket and provided the
>> requirements at the following lo
>
>Hey Murali,
>
>Great to hear about where you stand right now. Is the code (work in
>progress obviously) available on one of the branches? I'd love to
>take a look at it.
>
>-chip
>
Chip
I have been using 'events-framework' branch for this work. Please take a
look at 'framework/events/src/o
On 19/12/12 1:59 PM, "Anshul Gangwar" wrote:
>Hi Murali,
>Where can I find the FS for feature Event Notification Framework?
>What part of code your changes will go and how they will affect my work?
>Thanks
>Anshul
Anshul,
FS is not unto date yet, but you can refer to [1]. You can also refer to
I am splitting up my original proposal [1] so as to discuss each feature
independently. Please refer to the bug description [2] for the EIP
enhancements I am planning to do. As mentioned earlier first I am planning
to do a POC, but couple of issues that I want to bring it up for
discussion.
-IMU,
I would like to work on enhancing EIP/ELB functionality present in
CloudStack, so that highly available and fault-tolerant application can be
architected using CloudStack deployments at a region level. EIP and ELB
are both AWS networking features that help building fault-tolerant, highly
available
Murali Reddy created CLOUDSTACK-655:
---
Summary: framework for CloudStack to orchestrate virtual network
appliances to provide network services
Key: CLOUDSTACK-655
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse
Murali Reddy created CLOUDSTACK-654:
---
Summary: ELB: auto-scale request handling capacity by provisioning
LB appliances
Key: CLOUDSTACK-654
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-654
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Murali Reddy updated CLOUDSTACK-653:
Description:
Introduce the ability in CloudStack to orchestrate setting up 'g
Murali Reddy created CLOUDSTACK-653:
---
Summary: High Availability: implement GSLB (Global Server Load
Balancing) capability for ELB service
Key: CLOUDSTACK-653
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse
Murali Reddy created CLOUDSTACK-652:
---
Summary: High Availability: EIP enhancements
Key: CLOUDSTACK-652
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-652
Project: CloudStack
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Murali Reddy resolved CLOUDSTACK-265.
-
Resolution: Fixed
This feature has been checked in to master. This commit
On 16/10/12 8:27 PM, "Murali Reddy" wrote:
>CloudStack supports guest networks of type isolated and shared. While
>there is rich support of L4-L7 network services like firewall, NAT, LB in
>the isolated networks, similar network services are not available in the
>networks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Murali Reddy resolved CLOUDSTACK-312.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Checked in this feature into master with commits
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo
