you elaborate on the
>use case that this is going to provide?
>
>> >Thanks,
>> >Sailaja.M
>> >
>> >-Original Message-
>> >From: Sailaja Mada [mailto:sailaja.m...@citrix.com]
>> >Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 5:32 PM
>> >
rstand the scenario completely. Can you elaborate on the use
case that this is going to provide?
> >Thanks,
> >Sailaja.M
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Sailaja Mada [mailto:sailaja.m...@citrix.com]
> >Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 5:32 PM
> >
hanks,
Sailaja.M
-Original Message-
From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 6:41 PM
To: Koushik Das; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Integrate Cisco ASA 1000v into CloudStack
Updated the FS with following changes:
- Use case se
ginal Message-
From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 6:41 PM
To: Koushik Das; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Integrate Cisco ASA 1000v into CloudStack
Updated the FS with following changes:
- Use case section updated, classifie
On 3/13/13 9:40 AM, "Koushik Das" wrote:
>I am trying to understand the deployment model with Asa1000v for the VPC
>use case mentioned in FS
>- Cloud operator creates VPC network offering with source nat using
>ASA1000v as the service provider for firewall, source nat, port
>forwarding, ACL and
s
> Cc: Manan Shah
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Integrate Cisco ASA 1000v into CloudStack
>
> - It might be better to support VPC instead of "isolated". Even if it means
> that some features are not supported initially. I feel that "isolated is a
> special
> case
Resending as I didn't see the mail on dev list.
> -Original Message-
> From: Koushik Das
> Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 6:37 PM
> To: Chiradeep Vittal; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: Manan Shah
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Integrate Cisco AS
> -Original Message-
> From: Chiradeep Vittal
> Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 5:56 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Koushik Das
> Cc: Manan Shah
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Integrate Cisco ASA 1000v into CloudStack
>
> - It might be better to support
---Original Message-
>> From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com]
>> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 7:08 PM
>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Integrate Cisco ASA 1000v into CloudStack
>>
>> Updated the FS with API,
7:08 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Integrate Cisco ASA 1000v into CloudStack
>
> Updated the FS with API, Db changes and current deployment limitations.
> Also updated the UI section as to what all needs to be added.
>
> Chiradeep,
> I looked at
age-
> From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 9:57 AM
> To: Koushik Das; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Integrate Cisco ASA 1000v into CloudStack
>
> Yeah, the spinning up of virtual appliances
gt;
>Thanks,
>Koushik
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
>> Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 1:39 AM
>> To: CloudStack DeveloperList
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Integrate Cisco ASA 1000v into CloudStack
>>
deep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 1:39 AM
> To: CloudStack DeveloperList
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Integrate Cisco ASA 1000v into CloudStack
>
> Thanks for the FS updates.
> Good progress.
> I had forgotten about registering the ASA 1000v wi
-Original Message-
>From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
>Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2013 1:30 AM
>To: CloudStack DeveloperList
>Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Integrate Cisco ASA 1000v into CloudStack
>
>Take a look here:
>https://cwiki.apache.or
ittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2013 1:30 AM
To: CloudStack DeveloperList
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Integrate Cisco ASA 1000v into CloudStack
Take a look here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Cisco+VNMC+integrati
on
This is something I had
he feature that
>Manan has proposed (supporting asa1000v as an external firewall).
>
>Thanks,
>Koushik
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
>> Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2013 2:18 AM
>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apach
t: Sunday, January 06, 2013 2:18 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Integrate Cisco ASA 1000v into CloudStack
>
> Manan,
>
> Can you address the issues that Chiradeep has brought up? I think for a
> requirements discussion it is just as impo
Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 6:16 PM
> To: CloudStack DeveloperList
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Integrate Cisco ASA 1000v into CloudStack
>
> There cannot be feature parity since the ASA1000v is only supported on
> VMWare.
>
> Should the ASA1000v
t;> Hugo
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
>>> Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 3:16 AM
>>> To: CloudStack DeveloperList
>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Integrate Cisco ASA 1000v into CloudStac
ep.vit...@citrix.com]
>> Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 3:16 AM
>> To: CloudStack DeveloperList
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Integrate Cisco ASA 1000v into CloudStack
>>
>> There cannot be feature parity since the ASA1000v is only supported on
>> VMWare.
>>
&g
deep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 3:16 AM
> To: CloudStack DeveloperList
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Integrate Cisco ASA 1000v into CloudStack
>
> There cannot be feature parity since the ASA1000v is only supported on
> VMWare.
>
>
There cannot be feature parity since the ASA1000v is only supported on
VMWare.
Should the ASA1000v be created on demand, or
do we expect the admin to provision a pool of virtual ASAs?
Should we support VXLAN as the isolation technology or VLANs?
On 1/3/13 5:08 PM, "Manan Shah" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>
Hi,
I would like to propose a new feature for integrating Cisco ASA 1000v in
CS 4.1. I have created a JIRA ticket and provided the requirements at the
following location. Please provide feedback on the requirements.
JIRA Ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-742
Requirements:
23 matches
Mail list logo
