Hey Ewan,
No worries. I'm familiar with Maven, but I'm more than happy to put some effort
into Gradle. It looks like a good choice. I did a few quick checks, Jenkins
supports Gradle with a plugin, Elipse support Gradle with a plugin and that's
for me the important part.
Still willing to give
On 08/10/2012 02:27 AM, Ewan Mellor wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:[email protected]]
[Snip]
Thinking about the milestone along those lines, I agree that cutting a
release branch over the weekend is a good thing. This is specifically
because of the pendin
On 08/10/2012 12:59 AM, David Nalley wrote:
Hi folks,
First, I apologize for bringing up another non-release related
discussion topic.
There have been a couple of times where the issue of the existing
cloudstack.org email addresses have come up - and it's now on our todo
list[1]
== The current
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6431/#review10111
---
It doesn't seem that complicated, but isn't this something we should
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6513/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
Fix the path for the API ser
Hi, Folks
I'm about to write some unit tests for what I have committed. However it seems
a little bit heavy weight if I follow the guide
http://wiki.cloudstack.org/display/COMM/Unit+Testing+101
1) About IoC, I had to inject all dependent DAOs/Managers for the class under
test, even if I want t
> On Aug. 10, 2012, 8:58 a.m., Wido den Hollander wrote:
> > It doesn't seem that complicated, but isn't this something we should
> > develop in a feature branch?
> >
> > Currently there is also local storage support for KVM and it would be nice
> > if this could be done for KVM as well.
> >
Hi,
Most of the documentation (/docs) currently uses tabs instead of 4 spaces.
Do we want to use tabs or 4 spaces here?
Wido
Hi,
It has been seen that logs on VR are not preserved. However /etc/logrotate.conf
says it is daily.
Please let me know the log rotation policy for /var/logs on VR.
Thanks,
Sanjeev
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6515/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Abhinandan Prateek.
Description
---
When
Hi,
Do vmware libraries really need to be removed and re-added manually?
Could ASF not acquire permission from Vmware to redistribute their freely
available sdk for this project?
This 4.0 would be the first big ASF release and you want to cripple vmware
support?
+1 to keep vmware support for 4.
Hi,
On 10-Aug-2012, at 3:29 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Most of the documentation (/docs) currently uses tabs instead of 4 spaces.
>
> Do we want to use tabs or 4 spaces here?
Good point Wido! I was going to email about this earlier but thought no would
care.
So, we should follo
Virtual Router does not have CloudStack agent running on it, the logs on VR are
not handled the way they are on other system VMs (i.e. using log4j)
Currently running: logrotate -f -v /etc/logrotate.conf on the VR shows it does
not handle /var/log/cloud.log
To enable a sample logrotation add t
On 10/08/2012, at 6:33 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> I can think of a legitimate reason for having webmaster@ and security@, but
> where do we forward them? What do we do with them if the people who it gets
> forwarded to are on vacation?
>
I don't know if webmaster would be useful any mor
On 08/09/2012 09:06 PM, David Nalley wrote:
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 8:47 PM, Ewan Mellor wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Robert Schweikert [mailto:[email protected]]
[Snip]
* We want to be able to package CloudStack in RPMs and .debs that
correctly depend on packages available on the
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 5:59 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Most of the documentation (/docs) currently uses tabs instead of 4 spaces.
>
> Do we want to use tabs or 4 spaces here?
>
> Wido
I personally like spaces, and have been trying to clean things up as I
go, particularly in stuff I
Specific individuals that have open questions to them below: Prachi,
Frank, Ewan
Updated RAT report:
https://github.com/chipchilders/asf_cloudstack_RAT_results/blob/master/_all.txt?raw=true
Outstanding Issues:
EC2 WSDL files:
Prachi, can you remove these 2 as well?
incubator-cloudstac
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6500/#review10115
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Chip Childers
On Aug. 9, 2012, 9:21 p.m., Joe
Applied to master. Thanks!
Can you please close the review Joe?
-chip
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/6500/
>
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 6:51 AM, Tamas Monos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do vmware libraries really need to be removed and re-added manually?
> Could ASF not acquire permission from Vmware to redistribute their freely
> available sdk for this project?
> This 4.0 would be the first big ASF release and you wa
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Murali Reddy wrote:
>
> In continuation to the disucssion [1] to have publisher/subscriber event
> notification mechanism in CloudStack I am proposing a framework for
> delivering events to the in-process subscribers. This is slightly
> in-contrast to the earlier d
Hi, All
I want to remind that many source files (hundreds) in the repo containing
@author tags, while a certain ASF projects explicitly recommended against this
tag and asked committers/contributors to remove them. For CloudStack, no matter
what the policy is, we need to add it in document 'cod
Chip,
I checked in my two changes.
1. Removed Base64.java from test directory.
2. Added the license back in the two classpath files.
I do have one concern about license in the .classpath. It's not urgent but
maybe we can address it post 4.0. These .classpath files are eclipse files and
they
Mice,
Will try to get back to you in depth on this email this weekend. Can you
provide more detail about why ResourceManagerTest failed?
As for Mockito, I'm the one who suggested to remove it for the 4.0 release
because no one was using it. It's MIT licensed. Maybe others can comment on
whe
+1
I always remove it anyways so no one can blame me for bad code. :P
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Mice Xia [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 6:24 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: About @author tags
>
> Hi, All
>
> I w
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Alex Huang wrote:
> Chip,
>
> I checked in my two changes.
>
> 1. Removed Base64.java from test directory.
> 2. Added the license back in the two classpath files.
Thanks!
> I do have one concern about license in the .classpath. It's not urgent but
> maybe we ca
>
> So question on that. If someone edits the project's classpath in Eclipse,
> does
> that file get re-generated? Or does it simply modify the file as-is? If it
> gets
> re-generated, then I think we should simply consider those files to be
> "accepted exceptions". If it modifies the file a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6523/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Nitin Mehta.
Description
---
Bugfix:
Heya,
I've been toying a bit with gradle. I've created a new branch "gradle", with
just two extra file build.gradle and settings.gradle.
So far I've been able to configure gradle to load some of the dependencies from
mavenCentral and most of the java code now compiles using the gradle build.
P
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Alex Huang wrote:
>>
>> So question on that. If someone edits the project's classpath in Eclipse,
>> does
>> that file get re-generated? Or does it simply modify the file as-is? If it
>> gets
>> re-generated, then I think we should simply consider those files
> For XenServerJava, my suggestion is this. The reason why we modify it is to
> put in client timeouts so that CloudStack is decoupled from Xapi when Xapi
> behaves badly. For normal operations, it's not necessary. We should just
> remove the directory and use the one from XenServer and force
Alex,
The reasons as far as I can tell:
ConfigurationManagerImpl is the class under test. Unfortunately it depends on a
dozon of DAOs/managers, which are not added as Mocks but real impls and they
have further cascading dependencies.
Currently not all of required dependencies are added to mock
On 09/08/12 5:01 AM, "Krishna Sadasivam" wrote:
>
>plugins/network-elements/brocade/test/com/cloud/network/element/Base64.jav
>a PRE-CREATION
Should Base64.java be of concern from ASF license perspective? I think
Alex removed it [1] from the repo and this patch will re-introduce if it
goes to
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 11:59:32AM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Most of the documentation (/docs) currently uses tabs instead of 4 spaces.
>
> Do we want to use tabs or 4 spaces here?
4 spaces, preferably.
--
Joe Brockmeier
http://dissociatedpress.net/
Twitter: @jzb
Yes,
Krishna, can you please use the Base64 class that's available in
deps/cloud-commons-codec-1.5.jar ?
org.apache.commons.codec.binary.Base64
-chip
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Murali Reddy wrote:
> On 09/08/12 5:01 AM, "Krishna Sadasivam" wrote:
>
>>
>>plugins/network-elements/brocade
On Aug 10, 2012, at 8:08 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
> On 10/08/2012, at 6:33 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>> I can think of a legitimate reason for having webmaster@ and security@, but
>> where do we forward them? What do we do with them if the people who it gets
>> forwarded to are on va
Hi,
Sorry for commenting to this thread during the busiest time right
before the release,
But I'd like to add my thoughts especially on networking part while my
memory is fresh since I started
working on integration our networking technology from Midokura to CS a
couple of weeks ago.
I'm still new
On Aug 9, 2012, at 7:53 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
> On 10/08/2012, at 12:53 AM, Prasanna Santhanam
> wrote:
>
>>
>> There are no issues with the apache confluence. Probably better than
>> wiki.cloudstack because it still does wiki markup rather than just
>> rich text edits. Pages might look
On Aug 10, 2012, at 1:19 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> That means however that you have to submit bugs fixes into master and 4.0.x,
> right?
yes
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 09:12:03AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
> Applied to master. Thanks!
>
> Can you please close the review Joe?
Yep, done. Thanks!
Should have all the remaining files done by the end of the weekend.
--
Joe Brockmeier
http://dissociatedpress.net/
Twitter: @jzb
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 06:59:57PM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
> The options I see are:
>
> 1. Discontinue all cloudstack.org email service.
> 2. Provide only official - project specific emails aliases (think
> webmaster@, security@, etc.)
> 3. Provide both official project emails as well as commit
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 7:12 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Chip Childers ([email protected]); Ewan Mellor; Alex Huang
> Subject: Re: [ASF40] License header update for Friday August 10
>
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6470/#review10131
---
raw2qcow2 is missing? Please resend the patch ASAP, the 4.0 will be b
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6513/#review10133
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- edison su
On Aug. 10, 2012, 9:04 a.m., Tomoe
Hi Chip:
I have confirmed that we could not include these three patches in ASF
CloudStack as they are for OVM agent code which is under GPL.
I would remove them from ASF repo and add some notice in README or
whatever to notice user to download them on demand.
Thank you
>
Considering that there is a code freeze happening soon, and as the main
part for VPC feature development is complete + the VPC code
has been well tested by cloudStack QA engineers, it's time to discuss
merging the asf/vpc branch into asf/master. At this point its too hard to
break it to several co
> -Original Message-
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 6:05 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Networking question
>
> > In basic mode, security groups are used for segregation but VMs are
> > only allowe
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6473/#review10136
---
CAStorSDK.jar and jmdns-2.1.jar are missing, seems the patch send to
I will try using org.apache.commons.codec.binary.Base64 and submit a patch.
Thanks,
Krishna
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 7:29 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Krishna Sadasivam
Subject: Re: Review Re
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: David Nalley [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 7:12 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Cc: Chip Childers ([email protected]); Ewan Mellor; Alex Huang
>> Subjec
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6285/#review10141
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- edison su
On Aug. 6, 2012, 1:39 a.m., Tomoe S
> On Aug. 10, 2012, 5:13 p.m., edison su wrote:
> > raw2qcow2 is missing? Please resend the patch ASAP, the 4.0 will be
> > branched.
It's not necessary at this point. it's basically a hook that will allow us to
do something smarter than a qemu-img convert (say fill the source raw image
empty
Hi all,
I'm testing the ability to specify an IP address to use, and have
run into a few issues. I'm running 3.0.2 off of the website.
If I use iptonetworklist, I never even get the network I want. It
creates a new private source nat network or uses the default one
currently existing for the ac
On Aug 10, 2012, at 3:04 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
>>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: David Nalley [mailto:[email protected]]
>>> Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 7:12 AM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Cc: Chip Childers (c
Can you write up the instructions and put it on the wiki? We can add
it to the other "optional" feature instructions, once we have a place
for it.
- chip
Sent from my iPhone.
On Aug 10, 2012, at 1:34 PM, Frank Zhang wrote:
> Hi Chip:
>I have confirmed that we could not include these three
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:[email protected]]
>
> [Snip]
>
> >
> > At present it isn't, (Xenserverjava is copyleft) and no one from
> > upstream XenServer is answering my emails regarding the status of
> > their proposed relicensing.
> >
> > --David
> >
>
>
I should mention that if I remove 'ipaddress' from the networkids
version, then it works. That's the only thing that works, though.
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm testing the ability to specify an IP address to use, and have
> run into a few issues. I'm
> -Original Message-
>
> [Snip]
>
> +1, from monday on we'll have a 4.0 branch.
>
> That means however that you have to submit bugs fixes into master and
> 4.0.x, right?
Yes, that's right. All changes should go into master, and anything that we
want for 4.0 should go into the release b
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Schweikert [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 10 August 2012 05:35
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Build systems [was RE: [DISCUSS] Binaries (jars) in our source
> tree/source releases.]
>
> On 08/09/2012 09:06 PM, David Nalley w
>
> The only exception I would make to the "everything in 4.0" rule is for
> documentation. I don't see any value in branching the docs, and I want to
> make sure that we can keep updating the docs at a fast pace even as we're
> deliberately slowing down the rate of change on the code. For thi
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 10 August 2012 12:56
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Ewan Mellor
> Subject: Re: [ASFCS40] CloudStack 4.0 release plan
>
> >
> > The only exception I would make to the "everything in 4.0" rule is for
>
> On Aug. 10, 2012, 5:13 p.m., edison su wrote:
> > raw2qcow2 is missing? Please resend the patch ASAP, the 4.0 will be
> > branched.
>
> Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> It's not necessary at this point. it's basically a hook that will allow
> us to do something smarter than a qemu-img convert (s
On 08/10/2012 03:52 PM, Ewan Mellor wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Robert Schweikert [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 10 August 2012 05:35
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Build systems [was RE: [DISCUSS] Binaries (jars) in our source
tree/source releases.]
On 08/09/
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6470/
---
(Updated Aug. 10, 2012, 8:29 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack.
Changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6300/#review10151
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kelven Yang
On Aug. 1, 2012, 9:14 p.m., Venka
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6470/
---
(Updated Aug. 10, 2012, 8:35 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack.
Changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6470/#review10152
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- edison su
On Aug. 10, 2012, 8:35 p.m., Marcus
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6470/#review10153
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Marcus Sorensen
On Aug. 10, 2012, 8:35 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6502/#review10154
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kelven Yang
On Aug. 9, 2012, 11:26 p.m., Fang
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Ewan Mellor wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: David Nalley [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: 10 August 2012 12:56
>> To: [email protected]
>> Cc: Ewan Mellor
>> Subject: Re: [ASFCS40] CloudStack 4.0 release plan
>>
>> >
>> > The only exc
> -Original Message-
> From: Ewan Mellor
> Sent: 07 August 2012 13:49
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Release Management Process
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Chip Childers [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Monday, August 06, 2012 12:59 PM
>
You mention the main part is done, what is left for this feature for
it to be completely done?
--David
On Aug 10, 2012, at 4:52 PM, Ewan Mellor wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Ewan Mellor
>> Sent: 07 August 2012 13:49
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: RE: Release Management Process
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@su
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 10 August 2012 14:06
> To:
> Subject: Re: Release Management Process
>
> On Aug 10, 2012, at 4:52 PM, Ewan Mellor
> wrote:
>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Ewan Mellor
> >> Sent: 07 August
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6473/#review10157
---
Jamshid, what is the license on CAStorSDK.jar and jmdns-2.1.jar? I p
> On Aug. 10, 2012, 10:52 p.m., Ewan Mellor wrote:
> > Jamshid, what is the license on CAStorSDK.jar and jmdns-2.1.jar? I presume
> > CAStorSDK is one that you own -- what about the other one? The license on
> > dependent libraries affects whether we can build the code as part of the
> > def
> On Aug. 10, 2012, 10:52 p.m., Ewan Mellor wrote:
> > Jamshid, what is the license on CAStorSDK.jar and jmdns-2.1.jar? I presume
> > CAStorSDK is one that you own -- what about the other one? The license on
> > dependent libraries affects whether we can build the code as part of the
> > def
We have lots of old unresolved review requests. If you are the original
author, you are the one who has to close the request (mark it as submitted)
once it has been committed. (Yes, this is daft, but it's the way that the tool
works right now.)
Please close your requests (either as submitted
We are down to the last two unit test failures (thanks to Mice for his recent
patch which dealt with two others).
The failures are:
com.cloud.agent.manager.ResourceManagerTest.testDeploy100Hosts (reliable) and
com.cloud.utils.net.NetUtilsTest.testGetRandomIpFromCidr (50% intermittent)
Full error
http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/job/test-junit, by the way.
Ewan.
From: Ewan Mellor
Sent: 10 August 2012 16:36
To: [email protected]
Subject: Unit tests
We are down to the last two unit test failures (thanks to Mice for his recent
patch which dealt with two others).
The failure
As I'm not a git expert, I would appreciate any help from the community in
figuring out what is the best way to merge vpc branch into master.
Couple of ways I can think of:
1) git checkout master; git merge -s recursive -Xignore-space-change vpc
Puts all commits from the vpc that are differnt f
As I'm not a git expert, I would appreciate any help from the community in
figuring out what is the best way to merge asf/vpc branch into asf/master.
Couple of ways I can think of:
1) git checkout master; git merge -s recursive -Xignore-space-change vpc
Puts all commits from the vpc that are di
I bugged a few folks directly earlier this week - got the list down by about
10-15 requests. I didn't bug people where the request looked like it wasn't
resolved...
On Aug 10, 2012, at 4:31 PM, Ewan Mellor wrote:
> We have lots of old unresolved review requests. If you are the original
> auth
> On Aug. 10, 2012, 10:52 p.m., Ewan Mellor wrote:
> > Jamshid, what is the license on CAStorSDK.jar and jmdns-2.1.jar? I presume
> > CAStorSDK is one that you own -- what about the other one? The license on
> > dependent libraries affects whether we can build the code as part of the
> > def
On 8/10/12 1:56 PM, "David Nalley" wrote:
>You mention the main part is done, what is left for this feature for
>it to be completely done?
>
>--David
>
Bug fixes mostly. There are also some feature limitations for the current
release - VPC is supported for Xen/VmWare hypervisors only; we are
pl
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6473/
---
(Updated Aug. 10, 2012, 11:47 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ewan Mellor [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 1:01 PM
> To: David Nalley; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [ASFCS40] CloudStack 4.0 release plan
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: David Nalley [mailt
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Jessica Tomechak
wrote:
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Ewan Mellor [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 1:01 PM
>> To: David Nalley; [email protected]
>> Subject: RE: [ASFCS40] CloudStack 4.0 release pl
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6325/
---
(Updated Aug. 11, 2012, 1:13 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Nitin Mehta an
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+4.0+Release+Checklist
Ewan, thanks the release plan. A couple of questions since I wasn't sure if
the goal is to include them in the release:
1. I don't see the Netscaler AutoScaling feature merge into master. Has that
been d
I changed the BrocadePluginTest.java to use
org.apache.commons.codec.binary.Base64. When I create a patch and try to upload
to review board I get the following error:
" The file
'plugins/network-elements/brocade/test/com/cloud/network/element/BrocadePluginTest.java'
(r0b8fd2c) could not be fou
You probably need to do an interactive git rebase, and squash your
local commits into one. Then generate a patch from that clean commit.
- chip
Sent from my iPhone.
On Aug 10, 2012, at 10:03 PM, Krishna Sadasivam wrote:
> I changed the BrocadePluginTest.java to use
> org.apache.commons.codec.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6540/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
Adding Apache license to sev
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6541/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
Added Apache license, fixed
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+4.0+Release+Checklist
>
> Ewan.
>
So there are a few timeline problems here.
The project has to vote - that stays open for 72 hours. (e.g.
annointing a release candidate) Once that vote concludes we then move
to getting IPMC appr
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6541/#review10166
---
Ship it!
Looks good to me.
- David Nalley
On Aug. 11, 2012, 2:55
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6540/#review10167
---
Ship it!
worksforme
- David Nalley
On Aug. 11, 2012, 2:41 a.m., J
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6542/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
Added Apache license, fixed
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6542/
---
(Updated Aug. 11, 2012, 3:41 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack.
Changes
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 9:27 PM, Will Chan wrote:
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+4.0+Release+Checklist
>
> Ewan, thanks the release plan. A couple of questions since I wasn't sure if
> the goal is to include them in the release:
>
> 1. I don't see the Netsca
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
