Re: [CMake] some comments to the new INSTALL() command

Alexander Neundorf wrote: some thoughts to the new INSTALL command: -with the old INSTALL commands the paths were always interpreted relative to CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX. At least I got used to writing "/bin", "/lib" etc. I.e. that the install dir always starts with a "/", so that "${CMAKE_INSTA

[CMake] cmake man page getting bigger

Hi, recently the cmake man page has become much bigger, which makes it a bit harder to use. Two reasons: -the extensive documentation for the new advanced FIND_XXX() commands. Maybe this could be a bit compacted, since they all share a common concept ? And the bigger one: -Th

[CMake] some comments to the new INSTALL() command

Hi, some thoughts to the new INSTALL command: -it is not possible to set the owner and group, at least I didn't find it -with the old INSTALL commands the paths were always interpreted relative to CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX. At least I got used to writing "/bin", "/lib" etc. I.e. that the inst

Re: [CMake] new RPATH support questions

Alexander Neundorf wrote: Von: Brad King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CMake is providing an interface to get whatever RPATHs you want into the installed binary. It is is up to a project's code to produce the proper path for its distribution. Only the project authors know how the binaries will finally

Re: [CMake] new RPATH support questions

> Von: Brad King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ... > CMake has no way to know what the proper RPATH is for external > libraries > in the installed binaries. Again, take my example of using a separate > Qt build tree. KDE would build and install with an rpath pointing at > the Qt build tree instead

[CMake] Graphviz support in CMake

Hello, I got tired of tracing dependencies between libraries by hand, so I added support in CMake to dump out a graphviz file of all dependencies between libraries. Example can be seen here: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake:For_CMake_Hackers To use it, run cmake in the build tree: cmake --gr

Re: [CMake] new RPATH support questions

Alexander Neundorf wrote: Hi, Von: Brad King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Alexander Neundorf wrote: Ok, I tested now the following: set(CMAKE_BUILD_WITH_INSTALL_RPATH TRUE) set(CMAKE_SKIP_BUILD_RPATH TRUE) set(CMAKE_INSTALL_RPATH ${LIBRARY_OUTPUT_PATH}/${CMAKE_CFG_INTDIR}/

Re: [CMake] CTest newbie

Hi Vingesh, Vignesh M.P.N. wrote: I thought of being more specific with my problem. I just want to simply test a file and post the result to a Dart server, initially to kick off. I don't want to build, no CVS, nothing. Just test a single file and report. Just run: ctest -D ExperimentalSt

[CMake] RE: [Dart] Looking to create working ctest-to-dart-server link

Dan, Is the content I wrote in the email below sufficient for a doc patch? An aside: I'm looking at section 8.1 of , and I manually ("eyeballed") compared it with rev 279, and the content doesn't

Re: [CMake] new RPATH support questions

Hi, > Von: Brad King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > Ok, I tested now the following: > > > > set(CMAKE_BUILD_WITH_INSTALL_RPATH TRUE) > > set(CMAKE_SKIP_BUILD_RPATH TRUE) > > > > set(CMAKE_INSTALL_RPATH ${LIBRARY_OUTPUT_PATH}/${CMAKE_CFG_INTDIR}/ > >

Re: [CMake] Bug or misusage ???

Philippe Poilbarbe wrote: But now as I do it correctly :), the target "extract_gshhs" (I gave another name in actual file) has no dependency whatever I put after DEPENDS or by mean of ADD_DEPENDENCIES command the only dependency generated in build.make is for build.make itself. The other targets

Re: [CMake] Bug or misusage ???

Brad King a écrit : ... ADD_CUSTOM_TARGET is meant to add a new top-level target (like ADD_LIBRARY or ADD_EXECUTABLE) in which build commands with dependencies are evaluated. Note this sentence in the command's documentation: "Adds a target with the given name that executes the given command

[CMake] RE: [Dart] Looking to create working ctest-to-dart-server link

Dan et al, At 3/7/2006 07:05 AM, Blezek, Daniel J \(GE, Research\) wrote: Sorry this has taken so long to respond. I added an XML example using the new Dart format to the SVN repository: ResultData/TestNewFormat.xml.gz. It's fairly long, and should include almost every type of Result (may

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.2 and MAKECOMMAND on Visual Studio 7

At 07:14 PM 3/6/2006, Bill Lorensen wrote: >I thought that might be true. Is this reasonable behavior or should I file a >bug report? Go ahead and file a bug report. There may be something we can do about this. -Bill ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmak

Re: [CMake] new RPATH support questions

Alexander Neundorf wrote: Ok, I tested now the following: set(CMAKE_BUILD_WITH_INSTALL_RPATH TRUE) set(CMAKE_SKIP_BUILD_RPATH TRUE) set(CMAKE_INSTALL_RPATH ${LIBRARY_OUTPUT_PATH}/${CMAKE_CFG_INTDIR}/ ${CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX}/${LIB_INSTALL_DIR}) Which gives CMAK

Re: [CMake] Mastering Cmake 2.2 Edition on Amazon

At 08:10 AM 3/7/2006, Eddy Pronk wrote: >Will the new book be available at Amazon? >(FedEx charges $37 for shipping to Australia. [by order.store.yahoo.com]) Amazon has just put the order into Kitware for the new CMake books. So, I would think that they would have availability in a week or two. Un

Re: [CMake] EXEC_PROGRAM and its working directory

Patrick Cheng wrote: I have the following scripts, it suppose to check out the ITK code to the ${TEST_BINARY_DIR} directory, but the result ITK code is actually being checked out into the cmake binary directory (C:\Program Files\CMake 2.2\bin): EXEC_PROGRAM(${CVS_COMMAND} ${TEST_

[CMake] Mastering Cmake 2.2 Edition on Amazon

Will the new book be available at Amazon? (FedEx charges $37 for shipping to Australia. [by order.store.yahoo.com]) Eddy ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

[CMake] CMAKE_UNAME bug?

Hi, test file: PROJECT(Test C) IF(NOT CMAKE_UNAME) MESSAGE("no uname") ENDIF(NOT CMAKE_UNAME) cmake . -- Check for working C compiler: gcc -- Check for working C compiler: gcc -- works -- Check size of void* -- Check size of void* - done -- Configuring done -- Generating done -- Build files