2007/4/18, Bill Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Jesper Eskilson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm curious about the design of the current makefile generator, and
> why it was designed the way it was. I've tried searching the mailing
> list archive, but without any greater success.
>
> One question pops to mi
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Pascal Fleury
> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 3:45 AM
> To: cmake@cmake.org
> Subject: Re: [CMake] Re: Avoiding convenience libs
>
> On Tuesday 17 April 2007 23:55:44 Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> > WAG:
What page in the book...?
Try "LESS" instead of "less" (note the capital letters)
CMake is only semi-case-insensitive -- it used to be all uppercase all
the time. Lots of folks didn't like it, so the CMake guys made the
CMake *commands* work regardless of case, but some command args (like
LESS f
On 2007-04-18 23:41- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I created a CMakeLists.txt file with the following:
# set a list of items
SET(items_to_buy apple orange pear beer)
# loop over the items
FOREACH (item $(items_to_buy))
MESSAGE( "Don't forget to buy a $(item)" )
ENDFOREACH (item $(ite
Try curly braces {} instead of parentheses ()
:-)
David
On 4/18/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I created a CMakeLists.txt file with the following:
# set a list of items
SET(items_to_buy apple orange pear beer)
# loop over the items
FOREACH (item $(items_to_buy))
M
I created a CMakeLists.txt file with the following:
# set a list of items
SET(items_to_buy apple orange pear beer)
# loop over the items
FOREACH (item $(items_to_buy))
MESSAGE( "Don't forget to buy a $(item)" )
ENDFOREACH (item $(items_to_buy))
MESSAGE( $(items_to_buy) )
when I run ei
Hi,
just need a little push to get over the hump here..
I have a set of vtk custom classes built into static libs
with the cmake set up modelled after VTK/Examples/Build/vtkMy:
but called vtkLocal.
I am building a KWWidgets app that requires vtkLocal:
in my kww app CMakeLists.txt:
FIND_PACKAGE(
Bill Hoffman wrote:
> Jesper Eskilson wrote:
>> I counted at least three levels on my project, where the leaf
>> make process only compiles a single file (!), where each make process
>> does the complete phase of parsing, building up a dependency tree,
>> etc.
It is not as bad as it looks. Each r
Jesper Eskilson wrote:
Hi all,
I'm curious about the design of the current makefile generator, and
why it was designed the way it was. I've tried searching the mailing
list archive, but without any greater success.
One question pops to mind: why invoke use so many levels of recursive
make? I co
Hi all,
I'm curious about the design of the current makefile generator, and
why it was designed the way it was. I've tried searching the mailing
list archive, but without any greater success.
One question pops to mind: why invoke use so many levels of recursive
make? I counted at least three lev
10 matches
Mail list logo