Eric,
You have my blessing, if this was your question.
Thanks !
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Some CPack DEB generator related bugs are pending:
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=10292 (with patches)
Hi there,
Before the next release, could someone please update FindBoost to
search for 1.42.
Thanks
--
Mathieu
___
cmake-developers mailing list
cmake-developers@cmake.org
http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
Hi Alex,
Will this do?
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_Generator_Specific_Information#Makefile_generators
Regards,
Arjen
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Neundorf [mailto:a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net]
Sent: zondag 25 juli 2010 19:09
To: cmake@cmake.org
Cc: Verweij, Arjen; Brad King
2010/1/19 Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com:
2010/1/19 Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com:
You should file a bug. This most likely is because we switched to
libarchive for creation of the tar and zip files.
Done:
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=10162
Small update,
I have
Hi everyone,
I am new to cmake, tell me if completely wrong about the way to do.
I have the following source tree :
.
├── algorithms/
│ └── algo1/
│ ├── x.h
│ ├── x.c
│ └── algo2/
│ ├── y.h
│ ├── y.c
├── library/
└── library.c
└── liblibrary.a
liblibrary.a
Hi! I have a rather oddball question, and I'm not quite sure if I'm
even asking the right question, but I'll describe the circumstances
and see if it makes sense...
I am trying to set up a CMake project which includes as subdirectories
other CMake projects, but it does so only conditionally.
I think it's a little strange to have multiple project file to manage one
project it multiple configurations, instead of having a single project file
for one project, that manages multiple configurations directly, isn't
codeblocks made for that ?
2010/7/25 Alexander Neundorf
On 26. Jul, 2010, at 17:59 , Clifford Yapp wrote:
Hi! I have a rather oddball question, and I'm not quite sure if I'm
even asking the right question, but I'll describe the circumstances
and see if it makes sense...
I am trying to set up a CMake project which includes as subdirectories
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Alexander Neundorf
a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net wrote:
Hmm, the Codeblocks generator is makefile-based.
What exactly does makefile-based mean/imply?
Each makefile-based buildtree builds only one configuration.
If you want multiple configurations, create one
On 26. Jul, 2010, at 18:49 , Olaf van der Spek wrote:
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Alexander Neundorf
a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net wrote:
Hmm, the Codeblocks generator is makefile-based.
It is single-configuration.
What exactly does makefile-based mean/imply?
Each makefile-based
Hi,
Where in the source code does the VS generator generate the multiple
configurations?
Olaf
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Michael Wild them...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26. Jul, 2010, at 18:49 , Olaf van der Spek wrote:
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Alexander Neundorf
a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net wrote:
Hmm, the Codeblocks generator is makefile-based.
It is single-configuration.
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Olaf van der Spek olafvds...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Where in the source code does the VS generator generate the multiple
configurations?
I believe all of that is in the modules. Its actually pretty easy to
edit. I have modified this on my side several times to
First let me say I don't know Code Blocks.
The question implies Code Blocks project files support multiple
configurations.
Yes, is my CMakeList.txt file going to impact the MSVC project file
generation, while I am forcing Debug/Release configurations to be built ?
grep for CMAKE_CONFIGURATION_TYPES
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 1:06 PM, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Olaf van der Spek olafvds...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Where in the source code does the VS generator generate the multiple
configurations?
I
It seems that a few people have attempted to get CMake going on VMS over the
years, and there are some VMS specific files in the source tar file, but
OpenVMS isn't on the supported list, and is called out on the ToDo Wiki as
unsupported.
Is there anything I should know, any tips anyone can
On 26. Jul, 2010, at 19:07 , Carlos wrote:
First let me say I don't know Code Blocks.
The question implies Code Blocks project files support multiple
configurations.
Yes, is my CMakeList.txt file going to impact the MSVC project file
generation, while I am forcing Debug/Release
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:23 PM, Michael Wild them...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, it's like this: CMake has various backends which generate the native
build tool. For MSVC, GNU Make, nmake, Xcode etc. Now, some of these backends
are multi-config, such as the ones for MSVC and Xcode. That means, the
On 26. Jul, 2010, at 19:09 , Clifford Yapp wrote:
Michael,
Thanks for an interesting reply. How do you decide what value to put
in XXX_LIBRARIES? Is that pulled from the child CMakeLists.txt file
back into the parent?
CY
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Michael Wild
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Michael Wild them...@gmail.com wrote:
The build_thirdparty macro calls itself other macros, e.g. build_zlib. That
one guesses the output location of the zlib libraries, creates an IMPORTED
library target and sets XXX_LIBRARIES accordingly.
The problem of
Olaf,
zlib is just an example. I'm working on building BRL-CAD, which has a
number of such libs, some of them not common at all. Also, the
project policy is to have the libs in src/other available for local
compile at need, so that part of it isn't up to me :-/.
CY
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at
On Jul 26, 2010, at 1:02 PM, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Michael Wild them...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 26. Jul, 2010, at 18:49 , Olaf van der Spek wrote:
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Alexander Neundorf
a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net wrote:
Hmm, the Codeblocks
Am Monday 26 July 2010 schrieb Michael Wild:
The build_thirdparty macro
calls itself other macros, e.g. build_zlib. That
one guesses the output
location of the zlib libraries, creates an
IMPORTED library target and
sets XXX_LIBRARIES accordingly.
The problem of finding the output
location
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Michael Jackson
mike.jack...@bluequartz.net wrote:
Because it may horrendously interfere with my current established workflows
Why?
but I would be open to trying this out. The main issue I can think of is the
whole release/debug versions of libraries
2010/7/26 Olaf van der Spek olafvds...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:23 PM, Michael Wild them...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, it's like this: CMake has various backends which generate the native
build tool. For MSVC, GNU Make, nmake, Xcode etc. Now, some of these
backends are multi-config,
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks a lot.
So the Code Blocks gen isn't native? Just uses a makefile for the
build system. That explains it.
It depends on what you mean by native.
The project file for Code::Blocks is generated by CMake but
On Jul 26, 2010, at 2:23 PM, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Michael Jackson
mike.jack...@bluequartz.net wrote:
Because it may horrendously interfere with my current established
workflows
Why?
but I would be open to trying this out. The main issue I can think
2010/7/26 Olaf van der Spek olafvds...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks a lot.
So the Code Blocks gen isn't native? Just uses a makefile for the
build system. That explains it.
It depends on what you mean by native.
The project
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:07 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
grep for CMAKE_CONFIGURATION_TYPES
I'm quite sure adding more configuration types here won't suffice.
IF(NOT CMAKE_NO_BUILD_TYPE AND CMAKE_GENERATOR MATCHES Visual Studio)
SET (CMAKE_NO_BUILD_TYPE 1)
SET
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Olaf van der Spek olafvds...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:07 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
grep for CMAKE_CONFIGURATION_TYPES
I'm quite sure adding more configuration types here won't suffice.
IF(NOT CMAKE_NO_BUILD_TYPE AND
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 9:00 PM, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com wrote:
You need to add variables and such. I believe that is done in windows-cl.cmake
I'd like to generate both dynamic and static, x86 and x64 configs.
CMake already knows how to build those, so it's not about adding
variables
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Olaf van der Spek olafvds...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 9:00 PM, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com wrote:
You need to add variables and such. I believe that is done in
windows-cl.cmake
I'd like to generate both dynamic and static, x86 and x64
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 3:12 PM, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Olaf van der Spek olafvds...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 9:00 PM, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com
wrote:
You need to add variables and such. I believe that is done in
On Monday 26 July 2010, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Michael Jackson
mike.jack...@bluequartz.net wrote:
Because it may horrendously interfere with my current established
workflows
Why?
but I would be open to trying this out. The main issue I can think of is
On Friday 23 July 2010, Brian Davis wrote:
--snip--
Because if they were excluded, we would have someone on the list next
month asking why she can't create empty directories with install()
commands.
--end snip--
True point taken. Then we would have 2 people who are correct ... Olaf and
On Thursday 22 July 2010, Michael Wild wrote:
On 22. Jul, 2010, at 15:57 , David Ojeda wrote:
Hello CMakers!
I am coding with some teammates that use Xcode as their IDE. Everything
is working fine thanks to CMake, except for the following situation:
1. Developer X checkouts a project
On 26. Jul, 2010, at 19:51 , Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Am Monday 26 July 2010 schrieb Michael Wild:
The build_thirdparty macro
calls itself other macros, e.g. build_zlib. That
one guesses the output
location of the zlib libraries, creates an
IMPORTED library target and
sets XXX_LIBRARIES
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 9:21 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
Olaf,
It's definitely not easy to make such a modification with the current VS
generators. For better or for worse, there are currently separate generators
for Visual Studio 32-bit and 64-bit projects. It would be a
On Monday 26 July 2010, Verweij, Arjen wrote:
Hi Alex,
Will this do?
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_Generator_Specific_Information#Makefile_gen
erators
Sure, thanks :-)
Alex
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects
On Wednesday 21 July 2010, Brian Davis wrote:
I too would like the answer to this and other questions. I have been
having the same problem with CMake (among others)
How to build a project that contains multiple 3rd party sources where:
1) build of one package is dependent on the not yet
On Wednesday 21 July 2010, Ryan Pavlik wrote:
My CreateDashboardScripts.cmake and DashboardScript.cmake.in located
in this repository might be a useful example - I also had a hard time
figuring out how to do the new-style script.
On Thursday 15 July 2010, Chris Robison wrote:
I'm trying to create a project that embeds mono. I'm using Visual Studio
2010. In VS, I would normally go to Project - Properties - Linker -
Input and adjust the Additional Dependencies list. How do you add items to
this list in CMake? I've been
On Jul 26, 2010, at 3:46 PM, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 9:21 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com
wrote:
Olaf,
It's definitely not easy to make such a modification with the
current VS
generators. For better or for worse, there are currently separate
generators
for
On Sunday 11 July 2010, Kevin Fitch wrote:
I am transitioning from a make based build system to cmake, overall I am
quite happy with cmake, but currently there are two snags:
1) The main project I am doing this on is quite large, it produces about
300 targets. So, when I type 'make' I get 300
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Michael Jackson
mike.jack...@bluequartz.net wrote:
Is there a problem with multiple configures / build trees?
No, which is what is done now, just at a higher level than you are
wanting. You would like to have Win32 and Win64 in the same solution file
which
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Olaf van der Spek olafvds...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 9:21 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com
wrote:
Olaf,
It's definitely not easy to make such a modification with the current VS
generators. For better or for worse, there are currently
On Tuesday 06 July 2010, Arnaud GELAS wrote:
Hi guys,
We have been for our own projects the following file to find mysql
packages, and I would like to contribute it to the community.
Note: it works fine for MySQL 5.1 on Windows (tested on XP and 7), Mac
(tested on 10.5 and 10.6) and Linux.
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:12 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
Is there a problem with multiple configures / build trees?
No, not at all. We do this all the time. But again, I thought from your
questions that you were trying to do it all in one build tree.
I'm not familiar with
On Monday 12 July 2010, Michael Hertling wrote:
On 07/07/2010 09:44 AM, Michael Wild wrote:
On 7. Jul, 2010, at 9:32 , Michael Hertling wrote:
On 07/03/2010 01:03 AM, Chris Hillery wrote:
There's a slightly nicer work-around: Change project A's CMakeLists to
set PROJB_OPENCV_LINK as a
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Olaf van der Spek olafvds...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:12 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
Is there a problem with multiple configures / build trees?
No, not at all. We do this all the time. But again, I thought from your
On Friday 09 July 2010, Kishore wrote:
On Wednesday 07 Jul 2010 8:54:52 pm Kishore wrote:
On Friday 02 Jul 2010 12:36:17 am Kishore wrote:
On Friday 02 Jul 2010 12:07:07 am Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Thursday 01 July 2010, Kishore wrote:
It seems that the PROJECT() command does a
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:31 PM, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com wrote:
You do not have multiple copies of the source. You have 1 copy of the
source that you build in multiple trees. For me I build 32 and 64 bit
for multiple compilers. They all share the same source tree but have
different
On Friday 02 July 2010, Kishore wrote:
On Thursday 01 Jul 2010 8:13:56 pm Kishore wrote:
In the CMake wiki (http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_Cross_Compiling) it
says clearly that the platform module are included in the following
order;
Platform/${CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME}.cmake (mandatory)
On Jul 26, 2010, at 4:35 PM, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:31 PM, John Drescher
dresche...@gmail.com wrote:
You do not have multiple copies of the source. You have 1 copy of the
source that you build in multiple trees. For me I build 32 and 64 bit
for multiple
On 26.07.10 22:24:11, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:12 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
Is there a problem with multiple configures / build trees?
No, not at all. We do this all the time. But again, I thought from your
questions that you were trying to do
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Olaf van der Spek olafvds...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:31 PM, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com wrote:
You do not have multiple copies of the source. You have 1 copy of the
source that you build in multiple trees. For me I build 32 and 64 bit
On 26. Jul, 2010, at 22:24 , Olaf van der Spek wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:12 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
Is there a problem with multiple configures / build trees?
No, not at all. We do this all the time. But again, I thought from your
questions that you were trying
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Andreas Pakulat ap...@gmx.de wrote:
I'm not familiar with the term build tree.
That seems to be your problem here. The so-called source tree is the
project folder on your disk containing the actual source files and the
CMakeLists.txt files. The build-tree on
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 4:42 PM, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Olaf van der Spek olafvds...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:31 PM, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com wrote:
You do not have multiple copies of the source. You have 1 copy
2010/7/26 Olaf van der Spek olafvds...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:12 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
Is there a problem with multiple configures / build trees?
No, not at all. We do this all the time. But again, I thought from your
questions that you were trying to do
Here comes a proposal for a bash completion for cmake. Should work with almost
any cmake version because it's using cmake command to retrieve completion.
Prerequisite: You should have bash-completion package installed.
If you want to try you may either:
1) add the attache cmake file to
It looks like the thread Configuring targets software that isn't
yet built also touches on the issue I'm facing.
Hmm - wonder if I can work a trick with setting ZLIB_LIBRARY to just
the name of the subdirectory library target... looks like I have some
tests to run.
CY
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via e682e668481b37cfcf22b348a99abf429f0c1b51 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, master has been updated
via 13d686331e5bf410290dee530051987161173d86 (commit)
from
64 matches
Mail list logo
