On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Robert Maynard
wrote:
> I am able to replicate this problem with the 2.8.12rc1. Are you able
> to construct a minimal test case so I can dig into why this is
> happening?
Robert,
So far I haven't had much luck creating a minimal test case, but I
think I've pinpo
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Clifford Yapp wrote:
>
> I'll see if I can dig any deeper.
After turning off all the src and doc subdirectories, I can still
trigger the rebuild - here's the diff between the CMake outputs in the
4a6397a70c2b467b1285be4c0bae7533eb16f5e0 and
ad502502dfee281e5b0ad8a
Craig,
Thanks for the info. I went back and read through your post, and our build
has many of the same issues you are facing. For our project I ended up
keeping all dependencies in the context of the project workspace, and am
not using the find* modules to fulfill dependencies.
Thomas Taranow
Hello,
I've "implemented" VS2013 support, I'll send a merge request tomorrow (I've
not used Hg for a lng time)
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 12:43 AM, David Golub wrote:
> More or less. I’ll be adding support for VS 2013 once it’s released.
>
> ** **
>
> David Golub
>
> ** **
>
> *From:
Thomas, there are a lot of parallels between your scenario and the one I
just posted a question about yesterday (see subject line "One build,
multiple compilers and packages"). One of the two scenarios that Matthew
suggested is the one we've used to handle the external third party
dependencies - we
It's there--you just need to configure it to use lowercase instead of
uppercase. Go to Tools Options in Visual Studio and select the CMake Tools
page. Then, then on the Commands In Lowercase option.
David Golub
-Original Message-
From: cmake-boun...@cmake.org [mailto:cmake-boun...@cmake
More or less. I'll be adding support for VS 2013 once it's released.
David Golub
From: Pau Garcia i Quiles [mailto:pgqui...@elpauer.org]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 3:12 PM
To: David Golub
Cc: CMake ML
Subject: Re: [CMake] CMake Tools for Visual Studio 1.0 Released!
Hello again,
On 2013-08-26 16:37, Thomas Taranowski wrote:
I tend to agree with you that 2 would not generally be a target. However,
there are external factors at play that I haven't mentioned. For one, in
our environment we'd like to pull the auto generated code into a code
review tool, and to mechanize th
Matthew,
I tend to agree with you that 2 would not generally be a target. However,
there are external factors at play that I haven't mentioned. For one, in
our environment we'd like to pull the auto generated code into a code
review tool, and to mechanize that we have a commit daemon running tha
Dan,
How did you end up handling the precompiled dependencies? Did you use a
dependency management system, such as ivy, or roll your own system?
Thomas Taranowski | 425-442-9209 | skype: thomas.taranowski |
baringforge.com
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26,
On 2013-08-26 15:16, Thomas Taranowski wrote:
I have the following build structure:
workspace/
CMakeLists.txt # top level cmake
component_a/
CMakeLists.txt # component cmake
src/ # source in here
component_b/
CMakeLists.txt # component cmake
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Thomas Taranowski
wrote:
> Now, I'm trying to implement a multi-stage build which does the following:
> 1) builds some external third-party dependencies.
> 2) auto-generate some code
> 3) build the source
> 4) package the result
>
> To do this, I'd like to implem
I have the following build structure:
workspace/
CMakeLists.txt # top level cmake
component_a/
CMakeLists.txt # component cmake
src/ # source in here
component_b/
CMakeLists.txt # component cmake
src/ # source in here
Now, I'm trying to
Hello again,
Turns out I had uninstalled 2012, which CMake Tools does support. Adding
support for 2013 seems as simple as copy & paste
in source.extension.vsixmanifest.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Pau Garcia i Quiles
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Very nice indeed but apparently only available for Vi
Hello,
Very nice indeed but apparently only available for Visual Studio 2010. What
about 2012 and 2013?
Thank you
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 11:28 PM, David Golub wrote:
> Having received no bug reports for RC3, I’ve finalized the 1.0 release of
> CMake Tools for Visual Studio, which provides s
> On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 16:30:08 +0200, Niels Dekker wrote:
>
>> On 2013-08-26 14:33, David Golub wrote:
>> The two version differ solely in their version number, as there
>> were no bugs reported in RC3.
>
> Actually, I did report an issue on RC3, asking for lowercase code
> completion of CMake com
> Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 13:29:22 +0200
> Subject: Re: [CMake] Support for custom wix template
> From: eric.noul...@gmail.com
> To: laasu...@hotmail.com
> CC: cmake@cmake.org
>
> 2013/8/26 Lars Lars :
> > Hello,
> >
> > I would like to know if the feature "CPackWIX: Add support for custom WiX
>
Maybe CMAKE__SOURCE_FILE_EXTENSIONS would help with that.
For C++ this is e.g. CMAKE_CXX_SOURCE_FILE_EXTENSIONS set to
"C;M;c++;cc;cpp;cxx;m;mm;CPP".
Nils
On 26.08.2013 19:10, Robert Dailey wrote:
I have a common function defined that creates targets for me. I pass
in a big list of source fil
I have a common function defined that creates targets for me. I pass
in a big list of source files. Within here are resource files (.RC),
header files (.H) and source files (.CPP). However, I know that CPP
files can take many extensions, so I want to create a thorough, safe
check.
Does CMake have
I am able to replicate this problem with the 2.8.12rc1. Are you able
to construct a minimal test case so I can dig into why this is
happening?
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:33 PM, Clifford Yapp wrote:
> Just as a datapoint, the Ninja build of BRL-CAD when performed with
> this version of CMake resul
On 2013-08-26 14:33, David Golub wrote:
The two version differ solely in their version number, as there
were no bugs reported in RC3.
Actually, I did report an issue on RC3, asking for lowercase code
completion of CMake commands: http://cmaketools.codeplex.com/workitem/2
What do you think?
- Original Message -
> Hi. First, apologies for the length. If you are not interested in mixing
> different compilers and generating multiple packages all within one build,
> you can probably stop reading now.
> After trying various approaches and not being entirely satisfied with any, I
On 08/22/2013 04:39 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> Beside that, I played around with it a bit.
> If 2.8.12 is required, it errors out, as documented.
>
> If I use 2.8.12 and require 2.8.11:
[snip]
> So this seems to behave differently than in 2.8.11 even if 2.8.11 is required
> (and so the polic
Certainly. The two version differ solely in their version number, as there
were no bugs reported in RC3.
David Golub
-Original Message-
From: cmake-boun...@cmake.org [mailto:cmake-boun...@cmake.org] On Behalf Of
Niels Dekker - address until 2014
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 4:30 AM
To:
2013/8/26 Lars Lars :
> Hello,
>
> I would like to know if the feature "CPackWIX: Add support for custom WiX
> templates" [commit: bf23891942d95a4075f349f6c4043647d47e546b] will be
> included in version 2.8.12? I cannot find it listed in
> http://public.kitware.com/Bug/roadmap_page.php?version_id=1
I haven't tried this but I modeled the use of the template in the WiX
generator after the NSIS generator which I think allows custom templates
by creating a template with the same name in a custom path and appending
it to CMAKE_MODULE_PATH
(http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake:CPackNSISAdvancedTips)
Hello,
I would like to know if the feature "CPackWIX: Add support for custom WiX
templates" [commit: bf23891942d95a4075f349f6c4043647d47e546b] will be included
in version 2.8.12? I cannot find it listed in
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/roadmap_page.php?version_id=112 but downloading a
develop
Hi. First, apologies for the length. If you are not interested in mixing
different compilers and generating multiple packages all within one build,
you can probably stop reading now.
After trying various approaches and not being entirely satisfied with any,
I thought I'd seek the collective wisdom
On 2013-08-25 23:28, David Golub wrote:
Having received no bug reports for RC3, I’ve finalized the 1.0 release
of CMake Tools for Visual Studio, which provides syntax highlighting and
IntelliSense support for CMake. It is available for download from the
project web site at http://cmaketools.code
29 matches
Mail list logo
