[CMake] Patch for CM_OVERRIDE

Hello, I've attached a patch for the CM_OVERRIDE commit Best Regards Roman 0001-fixup-CM_OVERRIDE-Visual-Studio-2010-and-below-do-no.patch Description: Binary data -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, master, updated. v3.6.0-rc3-276-gb9b3ec4

_VERSION_MINOR 6) -set(CMake_VERSION_PATCH 20160628) +set(CMake_VERSION_PATCH 20160629) #set(CMake_VERSION_RC 1) --- Summary of changes: Source/CMakeVersion.cmake |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) hooks/

Re: [CMake] How do you handle recursive dependencies in CMake

On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 3:23 AM, Cfyz wrote: > On 28 June 2016 at 17:19, Raymond Wan wrote: >> I think if I were presented with the same problem as Sven, I'd <...> Or, >> if that wasn't possible, use ExternalProject. >> It's inefficient in terms of disk

Re: [CMake] [iOS] What is the correct way to add resources to an XCode project

Hi, I have used two approaches which is not based on assets directories. First is to save icons to resources with special names. In this case Xcode will add them automatically, see: * https://github.com/forexample/testapp/blob/9202304134862f043af740af27dc7efb3b3f565d/CMakeLists.txt#L28

[CMake] CMAKE_C_COMPILE_OBJECT vs

I'm trying to implement a cross compilation wrapper and hit a snag with CMAKE_C_COMPILE_OBJECT. I've found that on OSX / Linux (Makefile Generator), and work as expected, however on Windows (MinGW Makefile Generator), has both the flags and includes, whereas is undefined. Is this

Re: [cmake-developers] daemon-mode meeting last Tuesday

Tobias Hunger wrote: > Hello CMake Developers, > > Stephen Kelly and me met last Tuesday to talk about the daemon-mode patch > we both have been working on. It was a very productive meeting: We managed > to resolve almost all the differences of opinion we had. Thanks Tobias for the summary and

Re: [CMake] Dependency on imported target with ninja-generator

On Wed, 22 Jun 2016 19:44:14 -0500 Nicholas Braden wrote: > If Project B depends on Project A, you should probably be using the > ExternalProject module with a superproject structure that builds both > projects in the proper order. > >

[cmake-developers] Script to update liblzma from upstream.

Hi Brad, I have attached a patch that adds a script to update liblzma from upstream (closely modeled after the other update scripts). I am not sure how these kinds of scripts need to be run. We currently have a copy of liblzma version 5.0.5. The latest version on the 5.0 branch is 5.0.8. Once

Re: [cmake-developers] [CMake] [iOS] What is the correct way to add resources to an XCode project

No one? The target property RESOURCE does only allow files but no directories. Regards Roman > Am 22.06.2016 um 17:22 schrieb Roman Wüger : > > Hello, > > I read the mailing list but did find a way which works. > > At the moment I use Xcode 7.3.1 and CMake 3.5.2 which

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, next, updated. v3.6.0-rc3-590-gc664b95

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "CMake". The branch, next has been updated via c664b95b08f793808d881ed08919bfa1a7fce409 (commit) via

Re: [CMake] [iOS] What is the correct way to add resources to an XCode project

No one? The target property RESOURCE does only allow files but no directories. Regards Roman > Am 22.06.2016 um 17:22 schrieb Roman Wüger : > > Hello, > > I read the mailing list but did find a way which works. > > At the moment I use Xcode 7.3.1 and CMake 3.5.2 which

Re: [CMake] How do you handle recursive dependencies in CMake

Hello Sven, Raymond. On 28 June 2016 at 16:07, Sven Baars wrote: > Hence my question if there is some "right" way of doing this with CMake, without all of the code I wrote to work around the problem. I am under impression there is an important bit missing from CMake export

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, next, updated. v3.6.0-rc3-588-g0172bc1

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "CMake". The branch, next has been updated via 0172bc17b57d7a0b7b3a244124b41cb71cdbc4fa (commit) via

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, next, updated. v3.6.0-rc3-586-g29f8f5f

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "CMake". The branch, next has been updated via 29f8f5f6c24a1f513644c564098ba5be09cd33f0 (commit) via

Re: [CMake] [Visual Studio] Is it possible to specify a different target architecture?

Hi, Yes, it is possible. Generate the solution for Visual Studio 11 2012 and open it in VS2015. VS will ask you once if to convert the project and you say no. Done. HS Am 28. Juni 2016 15:51:47 MESZ, schrieb Adam Rankin : >Hello all, > >I am wondering if there exist CMake

Re: [CMake] [Visual Studio] Is it possible to specify a different target architecture?

From: CMake > on behalf of Adam Rankin > Date: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 at 9:51 AM To: "cmake@cmake.org" > Subject: [CMake] [Visual

Re: [CMake] How do you handle recursive dependencies in CMake

Hi, On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Cfyz wrote: > dependencies' locations. Personally I do not agree with that as I see > neither any way around specifying paths to dependencies not any substantial > harm in that. Maybe I am missing something but as far as I've found there >

Re: [CMake] [Visual Studio] Is it possible to specify a different target architecture?

Well now don’t I feel silly… Thanks! Adam From: Benjamin Ballet [mailto:bbal...@ivsweb.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:59 AM To: Adam Rankin Cc: cmake@cmake.org Subject: Re: [CMake] [Visual Studio] Is it possible to specify a different target architecture? Hi Look at

Re: [CMake] [Visual Studio] Is it possible to specify a different target architecture?

Hi Look at the CMAKE_VS_PLATFORM_TOOLSET variable 2016-06-28 15:51 GMT+02:00 Adam Rankin : > Hello all, > > > > I am wondering if there exist CMake commands/variables to specify for > Visual Studio

[CMake] [Visual Studio] Is it possible to specify a different target architecture?

Hello all, I am wondering if there exist CMake commands/variables to specify for Visual Studio to have the project file(s) generated target a different architecture than the one associated with that version of Visual Studio. For example, I develop in VS2015, but would like to target the VS2012

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, next, updated. v3.6.0-rc3-584-gc2b11d8

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "CMake". The branch, next has been updated via c2b11d8dcb21a881e3b8df37bf54aca8c3dad6c8 (commit) via

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, next, updated. v3.6.0-rc3-582-gdb92ed4

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "CMake". The branch, next has been updated via db92ed4ef202cabc08e89e30ddf9d5253b196980 (commit) via

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, master, updated. v3.6.0-rc3-275-g4bbfea1

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "CMake". The branch, master has been updated via 4bbfea17510d25c950747c4b0f877e5d5b1f528e (commit) via

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, next, updated. v3.6.0-rc3-580-gfb2f66b

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "CMake". The branch, next has been updated via fb2f66b6933a95d22f7ca1df9e9be45b771f3640 (commit) via

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, next, updated. v3.6.0-rc3-578-g9d1b5b1

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "CMake". The branch, next has been updated via 9d1b5b13d3ae39e617b8b14cee52d8f251ea6669 (commit) via

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, next, updated. v3.6.0-rc3-576-ge7df754

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "CMake". The branch, next has been updated via e7df754963dadf6c40f946f0ed5bd52809e7df2a (commit) via

Re: [CMake] How do you handle recursive dependencies in CMake

Hey Cfyz, After reading your post to the list, it does indeed seem like we have the same problem. I also wrote a lot of homebrew code you mentioned at the end of the post, but it indeed always seems to always break something for some user of the code, even though it seems to work for everyone

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, master, updated. v3.6.0-rc3-266-gf23d846

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "CMake". The branch, master has been updated via f23d846a971b99ec23bee1ff2afaee845a846e5f (commit) via

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, master, updated. v3.6.0-rc3-273-gf913121

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "CMake". The branch, master has been updated via f91312175822e94d66a92cb919dc04096609a7a7 (commit) via

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, master, updated. v3.6.0-rc3-260-g1b021a6

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "CMake". The branch, master has been updated via 1b021a64f8bf4d9544acb18628e3821f61f49e10 (commit) via

[Cmake-commits] CMake branch, next, updated. v3.6.0-rc3-568-g5317213

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "CMake". The branch, next has been updated via 53172138c490efe4e0b446c15af40fce00d09558 (commit) via

Re: [CMake] How do you handle recursive dependencies in CMake

Hello. I've posted a message a few days ago on a very similar subject. Didn't know there was a discussion already. The main problem in my opinion is that CMake target exporting system does not handle transitive dependencies at all. CMake handles them correctly at the build step, but not at the

[CMake] CMake Windows Visual Studio 14 problems

Hello Firstly I am very new to CMake, C and Visual Studio so please excuse my ignorance! My problem is I am trying to convert an old Visual Studio 6 project into a Visual Studio 14 2015 solution using CMake, however I am having difficulties settings compiler flags. I have been unable to find

Re: [CMake] How do you handle recursive dependencies in CMake

Hey Ray, Project A is used by many projects, and so is project B. So ExternalProject is not the right solution. I just want to be able to fix project B in such a way that people, including myself, can easily use it without knowledge of where project A is located. The packages will all be used

Re: [CMake] How do you handle recursive dependencies in CMake

Hi Sven, On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Sven Baars wrote: > The packages I use are installed in a non-standard path, because I don't > have access to the system directories on most systems I work on, but are > used by many other libraries. They are also all separate packages,

Re: [CMake] How do you handle recursive dependencies in CMake

Hi Ray, The packages I use are installed in a non-standard path, because I don't have access to the system directories on most systems I work on, but are used by many other libraries. They are also all separate packages, not packages in the same source tree. I did not see my attachment on the

Re: [CMake] How do you handle recursive dependencies in CMake

Hi Sven, On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Sven Baars wrote: > Hey all, > > Since I did not receive a reply to my previous mail, I decided to write a > minimal example explaining my problem, where I kept al the names as I used > in my previous mails. I hope that after seeing my

Re: [CMake] How do you handle recursive dependencies in CMake

Hey all, Since I did not receive a reply to my previous mail, I decided to write a minimal example explaining my problem, where I kept al the names as I used in my previous mails. I hope that after seeing my example, someone can explain me what I am doing wrong here. I included a script that

Re: [cmake-developers] daemon-mode meeting last Tuesday

Hi Brad, Am 27.06.2016 7:18 nachm. schrieb "Brad King" : > I will take care of making libuv available within CMake's implementation > prior to merging the server mode work. See the "libuv in cmake" branch > of this thread. Perfect. Sorry, I only noticed the other thread