Re: [CMake] CMAKE equivalent of qmake's MOC_DIR

2008-07-24 Thread Sebastien BARRE
At 7/24/2008 08:26 AM, Hendrik Sattler wrote: Zitat von David Boosalis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: The one complaint I have with building in another directory is when working with emacs. I like to do my make inside of emacs, that way when there is a compile error message I can click on it from emacs

Re: [CMake] Lua in a nutshell

2008-03-04 Thread Sebastien BARRE
At 3/4/2008 12:28 PM, Brandon Van Every wrote: > > > > - CMake script must be maintained indefinitely for a small percentage > > of users no matter what the migration strategy BTW, this point is intended to mean that CMake script must always be supported, even under the most wildly optimistic

Re: [CMake] cmake community site

2008-03-04 Thread Sebastien BARRE
At 3/3/2008 03:34 PM, Matt Williams wrote: I'm looking to see what you guys on this list think about me starting up a 'cmake community' site, possibly featuring the following: I think I agree with the other posters, this might be a little too soon. Thanks for your input though. We are actuall

Re: [CMake] CMake and Lua

2008-03-02 Thread Sebastien BARRE
At 3/2/2008 09:10 AM, James Mansion, wrote: If I have a project that is largely in a more convenient language - whether Java or Python or C# (or even Lua) - and it has material components in C++ for performance or reuse reasons, then it is clearly reasonable to ship something that can make a g

Re: [CMake] CMake and Lua

2008-02-28 Thread Sebastien BARRE
At 2/29/2008 12:39 AM, Brandon Van Every wrote: > Again: *deal*. > February 29th, 2010 *precisely*. > Special CMake/Lua day, the 29th. Or No Deal. 2 years is a number you've inappropriately reused from an unrelated context. You are right, I apologize. Bill said: "we might have two

Re: [CMake] CMake and Lua

2008-02-28 Thread Sebastien BARRE
At 2/29/2008 12:03 AM, Brandon Van Every wrote: > You've got a deal. I'll make sure to swing by Bill's office tomorrow > and remind him about his "realization". Let me write that down. On a > post-it or something. > > 2 years break, that's a bargain Bill. On that note, be sure to include ac

Re: [CMake] CMake and Lua

2008-02-28 Thread Sebastien BARRE
At 2/28/2008 09:06 PM, Brandon Van Every wrote: > So, I guess I will wait until then, and you can prove me wrong... Until > then, can you give it a break? Sure. Long as you realize that not everybody shares your pessimism about translators, and that if you do implement Lua support, people w

RE: [CMake] Re: function and raise_scope commands (+ unset bug)

2008-02-18 Thread Sebastien BARRE
At 2/18/2008 10:10 AM, Ken Martin wrote: > > FUNCTION(SET_VAR2 varname) >SET_VAR1(${varname}) > ENDFUNCTION(SET_VAR2) And you should live with that. And like it dang it! :) I'm linking it but I'm kinda surprised you wouldn't go for something beautiful *and* eternally classic like a new ma

Re: [CMake] Re: function and raise_scope commands (+ unset bug)

2008-02-16 Thread Sebastien BARRE
At 2/16/2008 03:48 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote: Would RAISE_SCOPE(var1 var2 ... varN) be better ? Why was the syntax changed from that to RAISE_SCOPE(varname value) ? (which was basically a set() and that's why converted to set(... PARENT_SCOPE) ) Sorry, I missed the fact that RAISE_SCOPE ha

Re: [CMake] Re: function and raise_scope commands (+ unset bug)

2008-02-16 Thread Sebastien BARRE
At 2/16/2008 02:13 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > I don't mean to remove the SET(PARENT_SCOPE) feature, where the main > purpose is to set a global variable from within a function. > But if SET( ... PARENT_SCOPE) is called outside a function, the effect is > that the variable is set in the par

Re: [CMake] Wee question about CMake developer etiquette

2008-02-10 Thread Sebastien BARRE
Hello Kein-Hong Man, At 2/9/2008 10:27 PM, KHMan wrote: I have a small question to pose to you guys (ladies and gentlemen alike) on etiquette: Is it normal for a CMake developer to jump into another mailing list and generally act in an obnoxious manner and act aggressively or provocatively? N

Re: [CMake] Re: Migration to subversion

2008-01-05 Thread Sebastien BARRE
At 1/5/2008 09:24 PM, Jesper Eskilson wrote: Those of you who haven't already read "Version Control and 'the 80%'" should do so (http://blog.red-bean.com/sussman/?p=79) *before* forming your opinion on centralized version control. Interesting read, especially the paragraph about: "In a nutshe

Re: [CMake] CMake with Lua Experiment

2007-11-27 Thread Sebastien BARRE
At 11/27/2007 04:02 PM, Juan Sanchez wrote: The reason I suggested Tcl was it makes strings easy. Most everything is a string in Tcl. Everything is a string in Tcl :) I'm not a Tcl noob, and things are not *that* easy in Tcl: when you have to throw an "eval" now and then, you know someone e

Re: [CMake] gettext example?

2007-07-26 Thread Sebastien BARRE
At 7/26/2007 09:07 AM, gga wrote: Does anyone have a simple gettext example being used with cmake? I wrote such framework for KWWidgets (http://kwwidgets.org) It is pretty hairy though, but I added a fair amount of comments. Check this directory: http://kwwidgets.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/CMake