On 8/18/2010 1:40 AM, Eric Noulard wrote:
2010/8/17 Orion Poplawski:
On 08/17/2010 02:58 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
Hi,
On Tuesday 17 August 2010, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I'm contemplating updating the version of cmake in EPEL[1] 5 from 2.4.8
to
2.6.4
Why not go directly to 2.8.2 ?
I thin
2010/8/17 Orion Poplawski :
> On 08/17/2010 02:58 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tuesday 17 August 2010, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm contemplating updating the version of cmake in EPEL[1] 5 from 2.4.8
>>> to
>>> 2.6.4
>>
>> Why not go directly to 2.8.2 ?
>> I think there ar
On 08/17/2010 02:58 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
Hi,
On Tuesday 17 August 2010, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I'm contemplating updating the version of cmake in EPEL[1] 5 from 2.4.8 to
2.6.4
Why not go directly to 2.8.2 ?
I think there are no known regressions.
Out of my hands. RHEL6 will ship w
Why wouldn't you go to the latest stable release of CMake, 2.8.2?
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> I'm contemplating updating the version of cmake in EPEL[1] 5 from 2.4.8 to
> 2.6.4 and was wondering if there were any particular gotchas to be expected
> from this move.
Hi,
On Tuesday 17 August 2010, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> I'm contemplating updating the version of cmake in EPEL[1] 5 from 2.4.8 to
> 2.6.4
Why not go directly to 2.8.2 ?
I think there are no known regressions.
> and was wondering if there were any particular gotchas to be expected
> from this m
I'm contemplating updating the version of cmake in EPEL[1] 5 from 2.4.8 to
2.6.4 and was wondering if there were any particular gotchas to be expected
from this move. Thanks!
1 - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWR
