On 21 December 2011 18:10, Renato Utsch wrote:
> Yes, exactly, the way it is now is not obvious, but it should be.
>
> I indeed thought that CMake 2.8 documentation was for 2.8.*, but I
> discovered this week that it wasn't. And I'm sure that this happens
> with A LOT of people.
As a matter of fa
o this frequently
> enough that I thought I'd bring it up, but as I said before, if we're the
> only ones who keep making these mistakes, then we can deal with it internally.
>
> Tim
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Renato Utsch"
> To: cmake@cmake.or
ones who keep making these mistakes, then we can deal with it internally.
Tim
- Original Message -
From: "Renato Utsch"
To: cmake@cmake.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 8:38:27 AM
Subject: Re: [CMake] Documentation request
Yes, but is not so easy to find. It woul
Yes, but is not so easy to find. It would be easier to have it in the
documentation page (if the page hosts CMake 2.6 or CMake 2.4
documentations, why it doesn't host CMake 2.8.3 documentation? They
should be on the wiki too!), easier to find.
Renato
2011/12/21 Michael Wild :
> As I already said,
As I already said, all the old documentation (back to version 1.6,
AFAIK) is available on the wiki.
Michael
On 12/21/2011 01:12 PM, Renato Utsch wrote:
>> You ?
>> This represents a fair amount of work...
>> I bet that if no-one did it it is because it's a hUGe task.
>
> Sorry, I am not that goo
> You ?
> This represents a fair amount of work...
> I bet that if no-one did it it is because it's a hUGe task.
Sorry, I am not that good with english, I meant as the CMake team with
'you'. But the 'CMake team' could do that with new releases, like,
writing this warning with additions in the newe
2011/12/21 Renato Utsch :
> I had the same problem a yesterday (or the day before) with the
> string( FIND ) command...
>
> I tried to find the cmake 2.8.4 docs but I couldn't.
cmake command **itself** is able to spit out its documentation.
So
cmake --help-command string
will give you the hopefu
I had the same problem a yesterday (or the day before) with the
string( FIND ) command...
I tried to find the cmake 2.8.4 docs but I couldn't. I think you
should do it, or at least to issue a warning (in the documentation) in
every command that wasn't introduced in CMake 2.8.0...
Yes, the Python
Am Mittwoch 21 Dezember 2011, 06:14:03 schrieb Michael Wild:
> OTOH, I think it would be very useful to mention the first version a
> feature was introduced in the docs directly, similarly to what Python
> does (see e.g.
> http://docs.python.org/library/string.html#string-formatting).
We already
On 12/21/2011 02:24 AM, Tim Gallagher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't know if this will get done, but is it possible for future releases of
> CMake to change the name on the website for the documentation? For example,
> if you just looked at the URL:
>
> http://www.cmake.org/cmake/help/cmake-2-8-docs.
Hi,
I don't know if this will get done, but is it possible for future releases of
CMake to change the name on the website for the documentation? For example, if
you just looked at the URL:
http://www.cmake.org/cmake/help/cmake-2-8-docs.html
and you didn't look at the header (which happens a lo
11 matches
Mail list logo
